I was too hasty, the article defines a date as 2 dinners, a bottle of wine, and 2 movie tickets. It's an article on the cost of goods/ services , not a survey of what guys spend on a date
the way a date is defined in that article is 2 dinners a bottle of wine, and 2 movie tickets.
Im sorry, but that is a shitty date any way you look at it. You cant talk during the movie so what is the point?
And dinner with someone you want to get to know is a waste of money, its no better quality time or conversation you could have over coffee or some drinks.
oh my god! NYC is what people call an "elephant graveyard" too, its where women who "want to enjoy life" [interpret that as you will] go and eventually become old spinsters.
Also NYC is one of the few cities in the US that has more dating age women than men, its a city in mens favor for dating. so why are the men spending that much money?!
is that the entire no go city where they wont even deliver mail?
d-d-diversity.... is....o-o-our.... s-s-strength....
with high speed broadband and cheap webspace, there are tons of free movie hosting sites out there. I havent paid for a movie to see a movie in a theatre or streaming and not as part of a date with a woman or social gathering in 12 years. And even then the total has been less than $100 over the course of those 12 years.
I was never into collecting physical media except for books anyways, and I was glad when movies and music started to become web based. I think I own maybe 20 DVDs and I dont even know where they are, in a box in the garage, a few in my car because it has a DVD player.
Some coworkers have an entire room in their house filled with bookshelves of DVDs. I just dont get it. Its so tacky looking. Is like a faux Study where you get dumber instead of smarter.
It says "Spae-Sex", I thought everyone knew that.
he has 3 balls. I thought everyone knew that.
do they really do them Q&A Interview style???
if you do it Q&A style, you can break up the work among many different people. You dont need one person to write the whole thing to make sure it has continuity, fluidity, no repetitive statements and the writing style is contiguous. The questions provide the framework.
'Scantily clad women on stripper poles' isn't all that far off.
you can admire the female form without it being sexual. A female gymnast, while wearing what could pass for a bathing suit, isnt intended to be sexual.
Also some people get off on feet, they make feet sexual.
All of it is a personal decision to make something sexual then be offended by it.
they didnt use the filibuster becaues they couldnt even get a simple majority. lol
this is the sort of thing you see in China, not the west.
accepted by the feminist journal Affilia on August 21, 2018
Someone did the opposite approach: took a Not-See anti-jew speech made in the 1940s and replaced key words with "men" and got it published in some feminist book.
thats why public AIs always get shut down. they end up making non PC statements.
i understand that, but the path the AI would take in getting to "this sentence is false" is a woven network of logic gates that grows more complex the longer the AI is active.
Writing one "this sentence is false" statement wouldnt break it, but adding in millions of "this sentence is false" statements would fuck things up royally.
but that is exactly what i am saying. SJW/PC culture or whatever you want to call it is constantly changing. Constantly.
When Trump was president Nazis are everywhere and bad. When Ukraine is found to have actual Nazis, they are no longer bad.
"Grooming kids is bad and it doesnt happen. Also we are grooming your kids and its ok"
There would need to be hordes of programmers constantly changing the AI unwritten laws with new inputs every day. Then it would turn into complete contradictory garbage that would crash constantly from all the conflicting constraints.
funny that indeed
lol. AI isnt PC or follow SJW rules unless it is programed to be so. An AI is a pattern recognition engine. Since PC culture and SJW culture changes all the time, it would be a massive effort to program, and the new and ever changing rules an AI would be forced to follow wouldnt make it work properly.
adapt to a conquering nation, they must be socially accepted by the new rulers to be safe from them
war brides were always a thing. and should prove to anyone that men and women are not the same
because women prefer safety over freedom. the problem is a husband used to provide the safety for a woman, but now women are married to the state instead so they want the state to provide for their safety.
i remember some quote, paraphrased here about a european discovering diamonds in Africa, the quote mentions an african child kicking a massive diamond like a hackey-sack. They didnt see the value in it, it was just a rock to them.
Even after the European development in Africa for resources, they still didnt see the value. And now the Chinese are doing the same and facing the same trouble: locals who dont care.
PS: Watch Empire of Dust, its a good documentary about the Chinese resource extraction in Africa. It follows around a PM as he attempts to build a road using local labor from a mine site to a city. The locals just dont care.
This is a lesson that women will never learn: inviting in the "T" destroys your spaces.
Women were all for inclusivity because it never affected them.
"Gay guys who pose no sexual threat to me? Great, i love gay BFFs, i collect them like shoes"
"Lesbians? Ok, I like the additional praise and attention from women. "
They thought sharing with troons would be the same.