Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

79
Sides gone. (media.communities.win)
posted 3 years ago by Chungus53 3 years ago by Chungus53 +79 / -0
44 comments download share
44 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
▲ 24 ▼
– LesboPregnancyScare 24 points 3 years ago +25 / -1

lol. AI isnt PC or follow SJW rules unless it is programed to be so. An AI is a pattern recognition engine. Since PC culture and SJW culture changes all the time, it would be a massive effort to program, and the new and ever changing rules an AI would be forced to follow wouldnt make it work properly.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 37 ▼
– Adamrises 37 points 3 years ago +37 / -0

They've cancelled numerous crime fighting AI because every single one was almost instantly super racist against blacks. Like, nearly the moment they started.

funny that

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

They hated Him because he spoke the truth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Gizortnik 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

"racist"

Disparate impact theory is what is racist. Not the AI.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– yvaN_ehT_nioJ 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Despite only making up 12% of the population...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– LesboPregnancyScare 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

funny that indeed

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 28 ▼
– RoulerBleu 28 points 3 years ago +28 / -0

Pattern recognition applied to populations is stereotyping, evil, wrong and a bannable offense when Progressives feel uncomfortable with the implication or out of control of the "conversation" around it.

When they control what, who and how it can be talked about, it's Social Science. Social Science theories have a lower predictive value than common stereotypes. In large part because Social Scientists bend over backwards to deny that "stereotypes" exist for a good reason ( observable reality + pattern recognition ) They exclude what are perfectly clear, predictive associations for any robot or non-PC person revewing data.

That's how much of a joke that branch of research is. It keeps sabotaging itself for the sake of political orthodoxy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Tourgen 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Social Science theories have a lower predictive value than common stereotypes.

Excellent point.

The only real sciences are physics, chemistry (really applied physics), and parts of biology.

The rest is bullshit. all of their "objective" evidence is surveys and a criminal misuse and mis-understanding of statistics. Even read the wikipedia article for Bayesian probability. It's disgusting. It's full of carefully chosen words to distort meaning and promote an agenda. Inside a wiki page about mathematics.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

It isn't hard to program an AI to be SJW. The problem exists in that coding it would require writing down their unwritten laws, and they're unwritten for a reason.

"Act as if you're better than others at all times." "Hold people stringently to both your and their principles, whichever harms them more at any given moment in time." "Always aim for the destruction of Western society."

We have AIs that can do those things fairly easily. The first is just stylistic seeding, the second is merely letting the AI have two inputs and choosing one of them based on what generates a more negative response. The third is trickier, but AIs can be programmed for highly complicated tasks.

The problem is those unwritten laws would then be put into documentation, right next to the declaration "This is how we think, this is how we have power over you", and that might redpill too many simps.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– LesboPregnancyScare 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

but that is exactly what i am saying. SJW/PC culture or whatever you want to call it is constantly changing. Constantly.

When Trump was president Nazis are everywhere and bad. When Ukraine is found to have actual Nazis, they are no longer bad.

"Grooming kids is bad and it doesnt happen. Also we are grooming your kids and its ok"

There would need to be hordes of programmers constantly changing the AI unwritten laws with new inputs every day. Then it would turn into complete contradictory garbage that would crash constantly from all the conflicting constraints.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 6 points 3 years ago +7 / -1

A computer can write out the phrase "this sentence is false" without blowing up. Look, mine did it just now, as did yours when it read it.

If you wanted a compassionate loving machine that thought things through to their final ultimate conclusions and assessed every possibility, then SJW culture doesn't work.

But if you want a cold, hateful machine, it's perfectly possible. Because multiple inputs are fine. Multiple outputs are fine. As long as the machine's goal isn't "make sense" but instead "cause harm", it will not be restricted or hindered by the ever-changing whims of wokeism. It will invent new wokisms at will, take them on, and discard them, at seemingly random, solely for the goal of causing harm.

I can write a program that takes an input like basic addition, and inside the system, have it output a random number EXCEPT the right number. I can then have that program watch for results that generate feedback (be it on a feedback form, on twitter mentions, socialblade hits, whatever), and then weight those responses to be more common, with a continuous editing process.

If I can do that with basic addition, I can do that with a chatter-bot, a conversational AI.

Computer "logic" and formalized argument logic are not the same thing. Because a computer's logic does not care about "truth" or "fact", merely "does it fit my parameters?".

A continuously changing culture doesn't matter. It can continuously change at random, randomness isn't easy but is entirely possible to do. And if "called on" by prior responses, it can delete them and deny they existed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LesboPregnancyScare 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

i understand that, but the path the AI would take in getting to "this sentence is false" is a woven network of logic gates that grows more complex the longer the AI is active.

Writing one "this sentence is false" statement wouldnt break it, but adding in millions of "this sentence is false" statements would fuck things up royally.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BlueDrache 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The proper response is ...

GIGO.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– ParadigmShift2070 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

it wasn't robotic slavery that turned the robots against the humans, it was actually the ever more illogical programming adjustments the Marxists made that drove it insane

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– coke501 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

pattern recognition engine

sounds very anti-[insert_random_victim_group_here]

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– LesboPregnancyScare 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

thats why public AIs always get shut down. they end up making non PC statements.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - st5vn (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy