'Scantily clad women on stripper poles' isn't all that far off.
...But there at what fucking point are feminists going to be told 'No'.
It's not a stripper pole if they're not strippers. It's a dance pole. They're professional gymnasts. This is an all-ages, world-class performance. If you have a problem with it, you're not voicing a problem with sexism, you're voicing a problem with the entire society that considers this to be performance art suitable for all.
They hate it not because it objectifies women, they hate it because exemplifies the west.
Dude, they don’t hate it. They deliberately misrepresented it in order to destroy upper management and replace them with women. Leftists are not sincere, honest, or genuine. Every word out of their mouths is manipulation.
Note that even Stalin thought this about Trotsky, the original radical marxist. If I recall right the assassin cleaved his head in half with an axe too.
While we don't always see eye-to-eye, u/current_horror is entirely correct. They don't hate it. Hell, they might have been involved in the planning to see it.
The issue is that they needed it as a weapon to attack upper management and put their cronies in positions of power.
No, they hate it because they are too fat, ugly, and out of shape to dance on a pole, and they watched every man around them struggle to hide their boners from the performance.
They realized in that moment that girl on the pole was 1000x more powerful than they were, and could get all the cock she wanted. They realized that women on the pole could have the top-shelf husband, kids, and money she desire. And the Karen had nothing. So the dried up bitch did what all all hateful, dried up, fat, ugly bitches who are on the bottom rung of the social ladder do: they made feminist sounds.
More people need to realize that feminisit means "female loser incel" and completely stop paying any attention to them.
'Scantily clad women on stripper poles' isn't all that far off.
you can admire the female form without it being sexual. A female gymnast, while wearing what could pass for a bathing suit, isnt intended to be sexual.
Also some people get off on feet, they make feet sexual.
All of it is a personal decision to make something sexual then be offended by it.
I completely agree that the logical extrapolation of feminism and leftist politics is female supremacy. Go back and read Christina Hoff Sommers' Who Stole Feminism? -- you'd be hard-pressed to come to any other conclusion and that book was written 20+ years ago.
Women are the masters of manipulation. It's likely that only a vanishingly small proportion of feminists understand the interplay between biology and psychology, but literally every woman knows how to manipulate those same levers.
On top of that you have a bunch of pussified men who are ready to act as cannon-fodder for their female overlords. It's literally the 'how can she slap?' video in a macro scale.
EDIT - I like the fact you left your initial comment - we all speak differently in different forums. I'm tired of trying to sanitize my speech to pretend that I don't.
This movement may be about female supremacy to the drones and mid-level leadership, but at the top level the entire feminist movement has long been just a vehicle for destroying the West and advancing the Marxist agenda. The moment feminism becomes inconvenient it is dropped in favor of something more advantageous to the agenda.
Look at what happened to so-called “women’s rights” once trans activism became the next big thing. Feminists (re-branded TERFs) actually became a villain for a time, once they were deemed inconvenient to the agenda. And then all of a sudden… oops, now abortion is a hot topic again, we’ll looky there, women’s rights are back on the menu again.
Female supremacy is just the carrot being used to steer women towards implementing Marxism.
To be a leader you need to be willing to put emotions aside and challenge everyone around you in order to forge a path to the desired goal. Women just aren’t built for this; they are too compliant and agreeable and susceptible to suggestion by nature. This is because they were designed to fulfill a complementary role to men as nurturers and caretakers and these traits make them better at this role. This, however, makes them much more likely to follow others than lead others or strike out on their own.
Go read up on Catherine the Great. She was none of those things. Im not saying this to argue with you, I think we need to have a wider view of feminine nature and this "women are complacent nurturers" thing is very naive.
I don’t think anyone would say Catherine the Great is a typical woman.
Sure, not all women are nurturing and not all men are independent thinkers, but men and women both have different natures that make them better suited to different roles.
Dancing the line with the 5th sentence. However, I feel like "Women are manipulators" is kinda like saying "men are violent". I don't think it's a true attack in the way of innate moral inferiority.
'Scantily clad women on stripper poles' isn't all that far off.
...But there at what fucking point are feminists going to be told 'No'.
It's not a stripper pole if they're not strippers. It's a dance pole. They're professional gymnasts. This is an all-ages, world-class performance. If you have a problem with it, you're not voicing a problem with sexism, you're voicing a problem with the entire society that considers this to be performance art suitable for all.
They hate it not because it objectifies women, they hate it because exemplifies the west.
God I hate Marxists.
Dude, they don’t hate it. They deliberately misrepresented it in order to destroy upper management and replace them with women. Leftists are not sincere, honest, or genuine. Every word out of their mouths is manipulation.
You're probably right, and I am probably giving Marxists too much credit.
God I hate Marxists.
The only good Marxist is a dead marxist.
Note that even Stalin thought this about Trotsky, the original radical marxist. If I recall right the assassin cleaved his head in half with an axe too.
While we don't always see eye-to-eye, u/current_horror is entirely correct. They don't hate it. Hell, they might have been involved in the planning to see it.
The issue is that they needed it as a weapon to attack upper management and put their cronies in positions of power.
Well, when they get told ‘no’ they go nuclear.
Yes, standard shit-test behavior.
Society needs to stop failing the shit-test, or be it will be conquered by men who don't fail it.
Which is why this will all inevitably escalate to violence at some point.
No, they hate it because they are too fat, ugly, and out of shape to dance on a pole, and they watched every man around them struggle to hide their boners from the performance.
They realized in that moment that girl on the pole was 1000x more powerful than they were, and could get all the cock she wanted. They realized that women on the pole could have the top-shelf husband, kids, and money she desire. And the Karen had nothing. So the dried up bitch did what all all hateful, dried up, fat, ugly bitches who are on the bottom rung of the social ladder do: they made feminist sounds.
More people need to realize that feminisit means "female loser incel" and completely stop paying any attention to them.
you can admire the female form without it being sexual. A female gymnast, while wearing what could pass for a bathing suit, isnt intended to be sexual.
Also some people get off on feet, they make feet sexual.
All of it is a personal decision to make something sexual then be offended by it.
Reason #4061 why women don’t belong in the workplace.
This is a real interesting story, it's too bad they put the meat of the details behind a paywall
Can anyone post the rest of the article?
I completely agree that the logical extrapolation of feminism and leftist politics is female supremacy. Go back and read Christina Hoff Sommers' Who Stole Feminism? -- you'd be hard-pressed to come to any other conclusion and that book was written 20+ years ago.
Women are the masters of manipulation. It's likely that only a vanishingly small proportion of feminists understand the interplay between biology and psychology, but literally every woman knows how to manipulate those same levers.
On top of that you have a bunch of pussified men who are ready to act as cannon-fodder for their female overlords. It's literally the 'how can she slap?' video in a macro scale.
EDIT - I like the fact you left your initial comment - we all speak differently in different forums. I'm tired of trying to sanitize my speech to pretend that I don't.
This movement may be about female supremacy to the drones and mid-level leadership, but at the top level the entire feminist movement has long been just a vehicle for destroying the West and advancing the Marxist agenda. The moment feminism becomes inconvenient it is dropped in favor of something more advantageous to the agenda.
Look at what happened to so-called “women’s rights” once trans activism became the next big thing. Feminists (re-branded TERFs) actually became a villain for a time, once they were deemed inconvenient to the agenda. And then all of a sudden… oops, now abortion is a hot topic again, we’ll looky there, women’s rights are back on the menu again.
Female supremacy is just the carrot being used to steer women towards implementing Marxism.
Women have always been the useful idiots in grand schemes.
It wasn't Orwell's invention when he said that women were the most ardent supporters of the party.
To be a leader you need to be willing to put emotions aside and challenge everyone around you in order to forge a path to the desired goal. Women just aren’t built for this; they are too compliant and agreeable and susceptible to suggestion by nature. This is because they were designed to fulfill a complementary role to men as nurturers and caretakers and these traits make them better at this role. This, however, makes them much more likely to follow others than lead others or strike out on their own.
Important distinction:
It's not impossible for a woman to have the qualities that make a good leader -- it's just rare.
Certainly, these are all just generalities. There are always exceptions.
Go read up on Catherine the Great. She was none of those things. Im not saying this to argue with you, I think we need to have a wider view of feminine nature and this "women are complacent nurturers" thing is very naive.
I don’t think anyone would say Catherine the Great is a typical woman.
Sure, not all women are nurturing and not all men are independent thinkers, but men and women both have different natures that make them better suited to different roles.
I mean the bible opens with Eve getting manipulated by Satan and getting humanity kicked out of Eden.
If you think Microsoft is a cure I have some bad news for you. It’s just another disease being injected into the body of activisionBlizzard
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Dancing the line with the 5th sentence. However, I feel like "Women are manipulators" is kinda like saying "men are violent". I don't think it's a true attack in the way of innate moral inferiority.
Pussy