This movement may be about female supremacy to the drones and mid-level leadership, but at the top level the entire feminist movement has long been just a vehicle for destroying the West and advancing the Marxist agenda. The moment feminism becomes inconvenient it is dropped in favor of something more advantageous to the agenda.
Look at what happened to so-called “women’s rights” once trans activism became the next big thing. Feminists (re-branded TERFs) actually became a villain for a time, once they were deemed inconvenient to the agenda. And then all of a sudden… oops, now abortion is a hot topic again, we’ll looky there, women’s rights are back on the menu again.
Female supremacy is just the carrot being used to steer women towards implementing Marxism.
To be a leader you need to be willing to put emotions aside and challenge everyone around you in order to forge a path to the desired goal. Women just aren’t built for this; they are too compliant and agreeable and susceptible to suggestion by nature. This is because they were designed to fulfill a complementary role to men as nurturers and caretakers and these traits make them better at this role. This, however, makes them much more likely to follow others than lead others or strike out on their own.
Go read up on Catherine the Great. She was none of those things. Im not saying this to argue with you, I think we need to have a wider view of feminine nature and this "women are complacent nurturers" thing is very naive.
I don’t think anyone would say Catherine the Great is a typical woman.
Sure, not all women are nurturing and not all men are independent thinkers, but men and women both have different natures that make them better suited to different roles.
This movement may be about female supremacy to the drones and mid-level leadership, but at the top level the entire feminist movement has long been just a vehicle for destroying the West and advancing the Marxist agenda. The moment feminism becomes inconvenient it is dropped in favor of something more advantageous to the agenda.
Look at what happened to so-called “women’s rights” once trans activism became the next big thing. Feminists (re-branded TERFs) actually became a villain for a time, once they were deemed inconvenient to the agenda. And then all of a sudden… oops, now abortion is a hot topic again, we’ll looky there, women’s rights are back on the menu again.
Female supremacy is just the carrot being used to steer women towards implementing Marxism.
Women have always been the useful idiots in grand schemes.
It wasn't Orwell's invention when he said that women were the most ardent supporters of the party.
To be a leader you need to be willing to put emotions aside and challenge everyone around you in order to forge a path to the desired goal. Women just aren’t built for this; they are too compliant and agreeable and susceptible to suggestion by nature. This is because they were designed to fulfill a complementary role to men as nurturers and caretakers and these traits make them better at this role. This, however, makes them much more likely to follow others than lead others or strike out on their own.
Important distinction:
It's not impossible for a woman to have the qualities that make a good leader -- it's just rare.
Certainly, these are all just generalities. There are always exceptions.
Go read up on Catherine the Great. She was none of those things. Im not saying this to argue with you, I think we need to have a wider view of feminine nature and this "women are complacent nurturers" thing is very naive.
I don’t think anyone would say Catherine the Great is a typical woman.
Sure, not all women are nurturing and not all men are independent thinkers, but men and women both have different natures that make them better suited to different roles.
I mean the bible opens with Eve getting manipulated by Satan and getting humanity kicked out of Eden.
Don't look at who leads the trans organizations
They changed tactics repeatedly. They can't decide whether to kill the ideology to save their privileges or push it harder to castrate more boys.