I completely agree that the logical extrapolation of feminism and leftist politics is female supremacy. Go back and read Christina Hoff Sommers' Who Stole Feminism? -- you'd be hard-pressed to come to any other conclusion and that book was written 20+ years ago.
Women are the masters of manipulation. It's likely that only a vanishingly small proportion of feminists understand the interplay between biology and psychology, but literally every woman knows how to manipulate those same levers.
On top of that you have a bunch of pussified men who are ready to act as cannon-fodder for their female overlords. It's literally the 'how can she slap?' video in a macro scale.
EDIT - I like the fact you left your initial comment - we all speak differently in different forums. I'm tired of trying to sanitize my speech to pretend that I don't.
This movement may be about female supremacy to the drones and mid-level leadership, but at the top level the entire feminist movement has long been just a vehicle for destroying the West and advancing the Marxist agenda. The moment feminism becomes inconvenient it is dropped in favor of something more advantageous to the agenda.
Look at what happened to so-called “women’s rights” once trans activism became the next big thing. Feminists (re-branded TERFs) actually became a villain for a time, once they were deemed inconvenient to the agenda. And then all of a sudden… oops, now abortion is a hot topic again, we’ll looky there, women’s rights are back on the menu again.
Female supremacy is just the carrot being used to steer women towards implementing Marxism.
To be a leader you need to be willing to put emotions aside and challenge everyone around you in order to forge a path to the desired goal. Women just aren’t built for this; they are too compliant and agreeable and susceptible to suggestion by nature. This is because they were designed to fulfill a complementary role to men as nurturers and caretakers and these traits make them better at this role. This, however, makes them much more likely to follow others than lead others or strike out on their own.
Go read up on Catherine the Great. She was none of those things. Im not saying this to argue with you, I think we need to have a wider view of feminine nature and this "women are complacent nurturers" thing is very naive.
I completely agree that the logical extrapolation of feminism and leftist politics is female supremacy. Go back and read Christina Hoff Sommers' Who Stole Feminism? -- you'd be hard-pressed to come to any other conclusion and that book was written 20+ years ago.
Women are the masters of manipulation. It's likely that only a vanishingly small proportion of feminists understand the interplay between biology and psychology, but literally every woman knows how to manipulate those same levers.
On top of that you have a bunch of pussified men who are ready to act as cannon-fodder for their female overlords. It's literally the 'how can she slap?' video in a macro scale.
EDIT - I like the fact you left your initial comment - we all speak differently in different forums. I'm tired of trying to sanitize my speech to pretend that I don't.
This movement may be about female supremacy to the drones and mid-level leadership, but at the top level the entire feminist movement has long been just a vehicle for destroying the West and advancing the Marxist agenda. The moment feminism becomes inconvenient it is dropped in favor of something more advantageous to the agenda.
Look at what happened to so-called “women’s rights” once trans activism became the next big thing. Feminists (re-branded TERFs) actually became a villain for a time, once they were deemed inconvenient to the agenda. And then all of a sudden… oops, now abortion is a hot topic again, we’ll looky there, women’s rights are back on the menu again.
Female supremacy is just the carrot being used to steer women towards implementing Marxism.
Women have always been the useful idiots in grand schemes.
It wasn't Orwell's invention when he said that women were the most ardent supporters of the party.
To be a leader you need to be willing to put emotions aside and challenge everyone around you in order to forge a path to the desired goal. Women just aren’t built for this; they are too compliant and agreeable and susceptible to suggestion by nature. This is because they were designed to fulfill a complementary role to men as nurturers and caretakers and these traits make them better at this role. This, however, makes them much more likely to follow others than lead others or strike out on their own.
Important distinction:
It's not impossible for a woman to have the qualities that make a good leader -- it's just rare.
Go read up on Catherine the Great. She was none of those things. Im not saying this to argue with you, I think we need to have a wider view of feminine nature and this "women are complacent nurturers" thing is very naive.
I mean the bible opens with Eve getting manipulated by Satan and getting humanity kicked out of Eden.
Don't look at who leads the trans organizations
They changed tactics repeatedly. They can't decide whether to kill the ideology to save their privileges or push it harder to castrate more boys.