Not sure if there are that many regressives that attend football games.
On the other side, the attendants have all contributed funds to an organization (the league, at the least) that has publicly denounced Butker's beliefs.
Who is really winning? It's good for Butker, but not much else.
The claims sound too perfect. But, supposedly, this is an affidavit. If it's valid, whoever made it is putting his neck out risking perjury charges.
Do they break down by state somewhere? It would be good to see if they have targeted "battleground" states too.
They can't honor history, only progress. Also note that they were on the "wrong side" of the civil rights movement, more recently than WWII.
I don't know how advertising works, but could a "channel" refuse a potential advertiser? I can imagine some outlets would refuse to air ads for Trump.
Also, is your state a "battleground" state (Don't answer that if you don't want to)? It may be that they're mostly spending in specific areas in the US.
And if that doesn't work for you: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/Vyrth
Archive.today link here for page 1: https://archive.ph/1TJYf
It's hardly devil's advocate to say he functionally didn't belong there.
He must not have read the sign(s). Or perhaps, that's how he identified.
Really, they just need to rewrite their "context" explanation.
I don my hipster glasses and hair bun.
First, that was 5 years ago, so basically ancient history, bruv. Unless she proposed it in this current campaign, Trump saying "now" is incorrect.
Second, the questionnaire might have just been asking about her support of a hypothetical policy. It might not have been her idea in the first place, thus not her true intention (should said intentions ever be conceived in the first place).
I'm not a surgeon.
~Kamala, probably
They're probably going to claim she was driven off by harassment and "threats."
If he's going the route of apologizing for sins against modern sensibilities, he's got a long ways to go.
I would have guessed holy water.
This is why we don't let grandpa out of the basement.
This is a terrible development, police taking rape allegations against (I assume) aliens seriously. They're falling away from the gold standard set by the officers in Rotherham not so long ago.
They didn't take the majority of Seattle's city limits, therefore it was not a big part. Checkmate, chuds.
It's meant to shame people for noticing and try to prevent further noticing or sharing one's observations.
The Expert's facts dictate that aliens are more law-abiding than the average citizen, provide unique, beneficial perspectives, make the economy better and THEIR FOOD IS SO GOOD. Only evil racists want them to go away. You're not an evil racist, right?
Well, there's a content warning at the beginning, so all the kids will obviously know to stop the video right away...
Anyways, I took a look at a supposed list of top videos with age restrictions applied. I think they're mostly looking out for language and some unknown level of sexual content (considering what others are allowed).
I think the tacos thing came from the murder of Mollie Tibbetts:
'Today, we need to turn the page. We're at the end of a long ordeal,' Rob Tibbetts tells crowd at daughter's funeral
Rob Tibbetts has not publicly commented on the [immigration] issue. But in his eulogy, he highlighted how the local Hispanic community had embraced him as he searched for his daughter in recent weeks.
While in Iowa for nearly six weeks, Hotel Grinnell put him up for free. During that time, he said he ate at a number of Mexican restaurants, where employees were sensitive and kind. They knew when he needed space or when he needed to joke, he said.
"The Hispanic community are Iowans. They have the same values as Iowans," he said, including an emphasis on family. "As far as I'm concerned, they're Iowans with better food."
Here's how the pet population problem is finally getting solved
the whole “I don’t even know who this person is” shtick
you're saying if someone doesn't watch internet normie bullshit
so what you're saying is--
It's not about watching. It's having some general idea of the subject. Since you're apparently aware of this drama--
I still don't actually know
--continuing to comment on the story while apparently being ignorant about one of the parties involved hurts your position.
My guess is they would counter with 'muh pay gap.'
I looked for some engagement with Richard Reeves (the graph's source). Not a lot of activity with his posts, but finally found these:
https://nitter.poast.org/1Whirld/status/1828488821245132959
Women are so lucky. More college debt to gain lower career earning potential. Who’s gonna look out for the men now?
https://nitter.poast.org/MonicaBisha/status/1828487688174936401
Have there been long term studies, based on this new cohort, done yet to show how women are achieving economically after college compared to men? Are women out-earning men in these age groups?
Did they get this one alive or no?