It’s an emotional modifier, they know when their readers see it they’ll cry “deboonked” anytime it gets brought up again despite being completely accurate. They’ll pretend an answer during a questionnaire on policy… doesn’t indicate policy.
Really, they just need to rewrite their "context" explanation.
I don my hipster glasses and hair bun. First, that was 5 years ago, so basically ancient history, bruv. Unless she proposed it in this current campaign, Trump saying "now" is incorrect.
Second, the questionnaire might have just been asking about her support of a hypothetical policy. It might not have been her idea in the first place, thus not her true intention (should said intentions ever be conceived in the first place).
So the context is MSM code for 'we don't know how to spin this'
It’s an emotional modifier, they know when their readers see it they’ll cry “deboonked” anytime it gets brought up again despite being completely accurate. They’ll pretend an answer during a questionnaire on policy… doesn’t indicate policy.
Really, they just need to rewrite their "context" explanation.
I don my hipster glasses and hair bun.
First, that was 5 years ago, so basically ancient history, bruv. Unless she proposed it in this current campaign, Trump saying "now" is incorrect.
Second, the questionnaire might have just been asking about her support of a hypothetical policy. It might not have been her idea in the first place, thus not her true intention (should said intentions ever be conceived in the first place).