“This needs context” of being 100% accurate
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
It’s an emotional modifier, they know when their readers see it they’ll cry “deboonked” anytime it gets brought up again despite being completely accurate. They’ll pretend an answer during a questionnaire on policy… doesn’t indicate policy.
Pretty much, it's like how idiots use 'Trump sounds mean' as a reason not to vote for him, just bypassing any need to argue on policy.
It's these kinds of idiots that give monarchists and those that want to bring in a social credit score just a non Chinese version legitimacy if these are the idiots that can sway an election.
I think most people who advocate for monarchy where it doesn't exist are somewhat simple-minded, but an advantage of monarchy over our collectivistic oligarchy is that the rulers will only sometimes be evil, and not always.
I think this continues as "her spokesman said that she is not running on that questionnaire". Not even a denial or repudiation.
There is no depth to which they will not sink to stop Trump. Actual election interference and in-kind campaign contributions.
Meanwhile they bring up random internet schizoposts as "Trump is running on X".
''I'm not running on that.'' = ''I will do it but you shut up about that.''
Really, they just need to rewrite their "context" explanation.
I don my hipster glasses and hair bun.
First, that was 5 years ago, so basically ancient history, bruv. Unless she proposed it in this current campaign, Trump saying "now" is incorrect.
Second, the questionnaire might have just been asking about her support of a hypothetical policy. It might not have been her idea in the first place, thus not her true intention (should said intentions ever be conceived in the first place).
I'm slowly coming to the upsetting conclusion that the vast majority of people are too stupid to have a say in anything, including what they eat for breakfast.