My Skyrim experience was always play for a few hours, get bored, decide to mod the game, spend a week trying to mod it, keep getting errors, uninstall.
What would I like to see? Compelling characters and stories. Not so boring and bland of a world. And if mods are going to be a mainstay of the game, it should be stupid simple to mod.
This is why I dislike MRAs. They actually think men and women are equal and deserve equal treatment under the law. Meanwhile feminists understand men and women aren't equal, pretend they want equality while push for women having better treatment under the law. I can only support men that push for men having better treatment than women under the law.
Here's an interesting concept. If men and women are equal then why do we need men's rights or women's right... shouldn't both have the exact same rights and therefore any specificity such as men or women's rights is in fact sexist? The only reason for men's right and women's rights to exist separately is if men and women aren't equal and if they aren't equal then they surely don't deserve the same rights, right?
Meaghan is gunning for USA politics not UK politics. She wants to run for President if possible. Harry is an accessory to her. The divide with the Royal Family if anything tends to help with American politics because Americans hate British Nobility. The whole I was mistreated by the racist royals plays well to American audiences.
Money? Yeah probably but it's not Harry that wants it, it's his wife.
Diversity and Inclusion. We should diversify our beliefs with theirs and include their beliefs with our own!
Men have 0 political power anyway because the majority of men are simps. If you want positive change you need to use force.
Most UK men love the idea of a bunch of white Ukrainian women coming into the UK. It might be the best thing to happen to the UK in over a century.
Not too long ago I tried to see a doctor in Canada and I was informed I needed to call the same day I wanted to visit and see if I could get in that same day, they weren't taking walk-ins or scheduled appointments, only a lottery system for same-day bookings. I called like 20+ times the next day and never got through to the line until literally 2 hours after they opened. Of course, they were fully booked for the day so I'd have to call again the next day. That's how bad it is.
TI1 trying to angle that women commit the most violent crimes is pretty laughable. Men committing more should be expected, just like we expect Lions to commit more violent attacks on their prey than we expect Zebras. Men have a distinct advantage over women in the use of violence so men engage in it more. It's also why of all the murders women commit, murdering children may in fact be higher on the list because children are one thing women do have a physical advantage over.
Sometimes TI1's blind rage against women really does make him blind. It reminds me of the guys who hate Jews that always need to show how every bad thing in the world is committed by a Jew that they start calling obvious non-Jews, Jewish to prove their point. Jews can still rule the world without every single bad thing being committed by Jews. Women can still be evil without the majority of violent crime being committed by women.
Take TI1's issue with domestic violence. The better question to me isn't whether the man committed the violence or not, it's whether the woman deserved it or not. Often times in domestic violence cases, the woman 100% deserved to have violence committed on her. The idea that all violence committed is unjustified is false. Gang violence for example is violence we see as justified between those two parties, which is often why we don't really care about it. We know the men who are engaged in these activities often bring the violence on themselves. A lot of women in domestic disputes bring the violence on themselves, so we shouldn't care if men commit violent crimes on women where the woman deserves it. Women often commit crimes on men where the man doesn't deserve it at all, such as killing a child. When comparing violence between the sexes, I think there is a very unfair comparison regarding the types of violence. We make the distinction between say cold blooded murder and warm blooded because we presume warm blooded means there's sensible motives, even if we disagree with them. Cold blooded seem far more heinous. I would propose that if we compared the violence women are involved in compared to men on a whole, women actually commit far more heinous violent crimes than men overall even if men commit more violent crimes.
Nah, I've just watched some anime myself and immediately I realized the female characters tend to be written almost absolutely perfect for what men desire and it's such a far-cry to how women truly are.
Correct. I have 0 desire to date because of numerous reasons, such as what you brought up but also something I've come to realize recently. I don't really enjoy sex unless I'm in a position of power over the woman. If I was a Hollywood producer, I most definitely would be using my position to fuck young celebrities. I totally understand the guys that are into this because it's literally me. I find women in western society are just too equal for me to be attracted to having sex with them. I actually find paying escorts more enjoyable than having sex with the average western woman. It's also why I think I prefer foreign women in poorer countries because they treat you as if you have an elevated status and thus the dynamics in the sex are way better. This might just be a me thing but I think a lot of guys are actually in the same boat but don't realize it. It's way so many guys that fuck around on Tinder seem unstratified despite all the sex because the sex they're getting is lacking the "spark" and I think the spark men are looking for is a woman who has a desire to please the man and women only exhibit this desire to please when there's a strong imbalance between the man and women, such as him being rich, powerful, popular, etc... The more equal women are to men, the less enjoyable the sex is even. Lots of guys think this "spark" is actually romance/intimacy/bond but I think when it comes to men, romance/intimacy/bonding between man and women is derived from a power imbalance. Men don't like equal women.
But that might be another topic to discuss. I imagine I'd get a lot of push back on that. Obviously exceptions to this do exist but I also think it's no coincidence men with money and power often wind up in situations where they're using their power and money to fuck women because it's actually something a lot of men find attractive. The King with the peasant girl mistress because the girl will do anything to please the King compared to the hag of a Queen who thinks she's just as good as the King. No man wants that... They want women with a highly motivated desire to please and women only tend to display this when there's a power imbalance. This is why a "patriarchy" where men were considered superior to women was such a desirable thing for men, it even made the sex better.
Id' be curious who she lays the blame at for doing the manipulation though because I think it was women themselves who did most of the manipulating, though yes men with power also perpetuated some of it. The reason I say it was women is because when you observe power or monetary imbalances between men and women where men have more power and money while women have less (you especially see this dynamic play out between westerners and foreign women in poorer countries), the women often act exactly how the men want the woman to act. She puts on the game. Biologically, women seem to actually posses the ability to be what men want and are dialed into it, yet women are programmed not to actually truly want to be this so women only put on the act when they're trying to get something, generally speaking. That's why feminists are so obsessed in alleviating the power dynamics between men and women because then women never have to act the way men want them to, which women don't want to act. This leads me to believe that when women truly were inferior to men at doing work, the women themselves manipulated the men into thinking the women were these amazing feminine beings (that men want) but that was always an act. A woman's true nature is not actually that.
And Incels don't want this kind of woman either. That's why a lot of them go for young girls. The pain from the affront they faced from women lingers...
What I mean is, Incels do often pick themselves up to a point where they are "eligible enough to date" but they remembered all the women who mistreated them so when a 35yo washed up, hit the wall, single mother decides to date the Incel, he isn't thinking he hit the jackpot, he's thinking where was this woman when he was 20yo? She was getting dicked by Chad while she would go out of her way to let the 20yo Incel know he was unwanted. This type of insult transcends time in the sense that just because he's now wanted by these 35yo single women, it's not actually good enough. He wants the girl when he first fixated on desiring women, which then brings the guy back to teenage girls or young adults, which also happens to coincide with when women were at their peak in terms of beauty. It's not good enough that women might later in life, after they lose their beauty, decide to settle-down with a previous Incel. That's actually insulting to the Incel. Many women don't realize the long-term consequences (nor will they ever realize because they are women or will they ever care) of hurting these men.
I'll also revert back to How The Grinch Stole Christmas. Remember when the Grinch was first hurt, it was when he was young. The woman who saved the Grinch was also a young girl not a 40yo adult woman. Perhaps coincidence for the movie but serves a purpose for the parallel to Incels. Women who treat these men badly when they were young, only to come back to these men when the men are older and already having established themselves are actually insulting the men and making things worse, ironically, as it just fuels the Ince's rage even further that women only want them after the women gave themselves during their peak beauty years to other men other than them and only decided to want the Incels after the women have lost all their value to the Chads. Rather than come to the Incel humble, the woman comes to him acting like he owes her. This just further damage that has already been done. Only a younger version of the woman can ever heal the wounds or she would need to come from a position of being humble not haughty like most of these women do.
I think what makes it the hardest to get over is a lot of the men can imagine the feeling. They know it's a potential feeling. It could be real, in theory. Then they see it in the media they consume as a possibility and society perpetuates the idea that it's real because people when in public or social media often present their relationships as meeting this ideal even if the truth is much different.
I'm convinced this is why so many guys like anime because the anime does a great job of conveying this potential kind of romance men want even better than western media does. Maybe Japan got fed the same sort of fake love BS from the west after they got conquered by the west and then perfected in to a level better than the west even as Japanese often do with these sorts of things. A little side thing but I was just thinking about it.
This aspect is also key to why so many men develop rage toward women. Imagine if what you wanted to make yourself happy was something women could give you but women refused to give it to you. That would make you bitter. What starts off as bitter, annoyance, unhappiness eventually develops into a blinding rage. Just imagine how you would feel if you were starving for food but you saw rich people eating food and the rich people refused to share that food with you? Most people understand this to be mean and thus many poor people might develop rage toward the rich; however, as woman would say, rich people aren't required to give their possessions to poor people. Poor people aren't entitled to food, or are they? And so we have men that might presume they too are entitled to the love they want.
That's why you get movements like MGTOW that try to help men by encouraging men to make their happiness about something other then women but Incels are so captured by women as the key to their happiness, apparently they even decide to become women themselves.
Yes, exactly. I feel bad for guys. Our society literally sets them up to fail. Almost all the media boys, teenagers and young men consume perpetuates the lie.
I truly believe society, for centuries even, has been designed to mask women's true nature in order to make women more desirable for men, especially since up until rather recently, women didn't work. If men didn't have this strong desire for women, then what would everyone do with all the women? Thus our culture built up this bluepill idea of women to make them seem far more attractive then what they actually are so men wanted to sacrifice in war for them, wanted to work 12 hour days for them and support women, despite women contributing barely anything in return.
This ramped up to overdrive though when women started being put into positions of authority over men because the women literally started believing their own shit and using this framework to extract even more from men.
It'll take a lot of time for men to figure it out and unravel the lies.
Are they white Christians? Then all of them.
I've been on a number of incel communities and know guys that even self describe themselves as Incels.
As counterintuitive as it might seem for a lot of people who think they know Incels, I'd say based on my observations. Incels actually really do love women in a sacrificing manner. They're kind of like chivalrous romantics that believe in the true love kind of stuff. The whole feel like I'm incomplete and there's a hole in my heart and a woman's love would fill this void.
Unfortunately, reality tends to hit and regular non-disney fabricated dating dynamics begin to show themselves. Women want money, status, power and use their affection as leverage with men to get that. A lot of Incels simply aren't valuable enough to get the affection they seek from women. This is ultimately what leads to their rage. A sense of being unwanted. And women treat men they don't want exceptionally bad. When men don't like men, men still have a sense of decorum. Women are outright vicious and psychopathic toward men they don't like.
A really good movie to understand Incels is How The Grinch Stole Christmas (2000). I know lots of people recommend The Joker but The Grinch actually shows Incels better. The Grinch was rejected by women and the one woman he did have a crush on used him. He became bitter and jaded and cold. But what saved the Grinch in the end? The kindness of a young girl. That's actually what incels desire more than anything, to be treated with genuine kindness and a sense of desire/belonging from women, especially a woman he himself has an attraction toward. Once the Grinch was shown this kindness he become a good person, the end.
Incels want to be saved in this same manner. And in this desire that often becomes a fixation and obsession, it might not be unimaginable that the Incel decides to become the very woman he desires himself because in doing so he then presumed to fill the void in his heart by becoming the very thing he desires more than anything else. You get that fixated and obsessed you start to become that very thing. Not unimaginable. And also the LGBTQ+ community is very welcoming to anyone, which also adds to it. A regular straight man who is undesirable becomes a loner. A trans guy gains a whole community of people supporting his transition and that sense of desire and belonging he sought starts to be felt. At least, it's an opportunity. If being a straight man didn't work why not try the latest trend of becoming a girl and seeing how it goes?
And just like that, AI Art is 100% legitimized. Humans clearly can't tell the difference between Human created art and AI art.
The 18,000 figure — which represents roughly 1.2 percent of Amazon’s 1.5 million global workforce
So, a rounding error lol. This is an indication of Amazon's views of the market but hardly an indication of a company struggling.
We can kill people with poison, that means life is a disease cured by poison!
A legal system that has no standing for fraudulent elections, that puts January 6th protestors in prison, that allows for open discrimination against whites, that doesn't punish antifa terrorists... What a great system. Keep clinging onto worthless values.
Unsecured debt is the best debt to take out if you can. What matters is in fact the rate. The only reason to secure something is to get a better rate or because your lender requires it. You don't even want secured debt if you can avoid it. If amazon is getting a good interest rate on unsecured debt that means amazon is strong enough to force lenders to not require collateral which is a good sign. It's when businesses start offering up all their assets as collateral for debt you should start to worry.
I work in banking... I know what I'm talking about. You're just trying to find something to get all alarmed over. This is literally nothing.
And finding investors is the most expensive way to raise money because it dilutes the equity of existing investors at a rate equal to the expected rate of return on the equity (what investors expect to earn as a return on their investment). That rate of return tends to be around 10% for average companies on the stock market and probably around 12% for Amazon using rough numbers. The cost of equity tends to be considerably higher than the cost of debt.
Exactly, so why would I support a concept that doesn't benefit me?
Hopefully no one reports him. The police are not on your side.