see that would be a reasonable position to take, if half of those women's rights advocates weren't batshit insane nutters calling for everything up to and including murdering most men alive.
90% is very generous coming from you. Especially as we're talking about "women's rights advocates" and not "women" in general.
I'd say it's higher than that if we include among women's rights advocates basically professional feminists and not the average woman on the street who says "like, I'm a feminist? Because I want to be paid equally and such as?"
Mostly they are just delusional. The people who are advocates knowingly try to benefit themselves (ironically as activists and not as women). The average woman is just brainwashed by propaganda.
Here's an interesting concept. If men and women are equal then why do we need men's rights or women's right... shouldn't both have the exact same rights and therefore any specificity such as men or women's rights is in fact sexist? The only reason for men's right and women's rights to exist separately is if men and women aren't equal and if they aren't equal then they surely don't deserve the same rights, right?
The argument Feminists and MRAs would make (and to some extent they'd both be correct), is that men and women aren't treated equally under the law (or society in general), and we need to rectify this unequal treatment. The problem is (as you point out) that men and women are, in fact, not entirely equal, and thus should be treated differently, if not by the letter of the law, then by society.
The argument Feminists and MRAs would make (and to some extent they'd both be correct), is that men and women aren't treated equally under the law (or society in general)
The issue I have is that this is true; most laws favor women if they a favor a gender at all, yet these so-called "women's rights advocates" are trying to con everyone into believing that they're the equivalent of a 1905 suffragette. The men's rights movement is a direct response to society moving the benchmark past neutrality and into gynocentricity.
This double standard is evident to anyone who cares to pay attention, such as the outcry of "it's never OK to hit a woman" whenever we see a video of a complete bitch assaulting her boyfriend or husband and then he has the gall to fight back.
This is why I dislike MRAs. They actually think men and women are equal and deserve equal treatment under the law. Meanwhile feminists understand men and women aren't equal, pretend they want equality while push for women having better treatment under the law. I can only support men that push for men having better treatment than women under the law.
You can't have an actual thoughtful or thought provoking discussion with a group of people that have decided wholeheartedly to define what they are out of existence and can no longer actually define what they are.
Still confused on why half of women's rights advocates being nutters (a bit of an understatement) means that you have to hate all women, or you suffer from 'Stockholm Syndrome'.
see that would be a reasonable position to take, if half of those women's rights advocates weren't batshit insane nutters calling for everything up to and including murdering most men alive.
Agreed
Fat more than half
90% is very generous coming from you. Especially as we're talking about "women's rights advocates" and not "women" in general.
I'd say it's higher than that if we include among women's rights advocates basically professional feminists and not the average woman on the street who says "like, I'm a feminist? Because I want to be paid equally and such as?"
Mostly they are just delusional. The people who are advocates knowingly try to benefit themselves (ironically as activists and not as women). The average woman is just brainwashed by propaganda.
lol, you literally use it as an excuse for the bad behavior of coomers
Clearly your constant schizo posting is the healthy way to handle it right?
Here's an interesting concept. If men and women are equal then why do we need men's rights or women's right... shouldn't both have the exact same rights and therefore any specificity such as men or women's rights is in fact sexist? The only reason for men's right and women's rights to exist separately is if men and women aren't equal and if they aren't equal then they surely don't deserve the same rights, right?
The argument Feminists and MRAs would make (and to some extent they'd both be correct), is that men and women aren't treated equally under the law (or society in general), and we need to rectify this unequal treatment. The problem is (as you point out) that men and women are, in fact, not entirely equal, and thus should be treated differently, if not by the letter of the law, then by society.
The issue I have is that this is true; most laws favor women if they a favor a gender at all, yet these so-called "women's rights advocates" are trying to con everyone into believing that they're the equivalent of a 1905 suffragette. The men's rights movement is a direct response to society moving the benchmark past neutrality and into gynocentricity.
This double standard is evident to anyone who cares to pay attention, such as the outcry of "it's never OK to hit a woman" whenever we see a video of a complete bitch assaulting her boyfriend or husband and then he has the gall to fight back.
This is why I dislike MRAs. They actually think men and women are equal and deserve equal treatment under the law. Meanwhile feminists understand men and women aren't equal, pretend they want equality while push for women having better treatment under the law. I can only support men that push for men having better treatment than women under the law.
You can't have an actual thoughtful or thought provoking discussion with a group of people that have decided wholeheartedly to define what they are out of existence and can no longer actually define what they are.
How?
Still confused on why half of women's rights advocates being nutters (a bit of an understatement) means that you have to hate all women, or you suffer from 'Stockholm Syndrome'.
breaking news: reddit user learns how to breathe