She's lying about the evidence. Again. Expect a liar to lie.
This is nothing but a PR push. If she had exonerating evidence, it would have been front and center in Virginia.
What she has is therapist's notes which were excluded. They were excluded because they're basically her lying and fabricating lies about Johnny in real time-- and the therapist nodding along. They are hearsay, and have no legal weight in a court of law. The court of public opinion is a different story.
Expect a second lawsuit if she gets the 'tell-all' book deal and commits further to this lie.
So DeSantis stood up against his own party doing things the wrong way. That bill was upsetting established law post facto, without instituting better law moving forward. You are arguing opposing that law means that he's in the pocket of feminists?
You know that broken clocks are sometimes right, but if a feminist agrees on the time, the broken clock is now a traitor to all mankind according to your logic.
There's hilarious shit in there.
The DO NOT ATTEMPT taco bell challenge, for one.
The challenge is to eat 25 bucks of taco bell in one sitting. 25 1987 inflation adjusted bucks. (The challenge was started in 1987. And fair is fair.)
Needless to say, it's torture. Don't do it. But laugh about it, and enjoy the story.
The Black Pants Legion; a merry bunch of shitposting maniac Battletech players have a podcast.
"You look really tired," says a woman in MAC Greensmoke to another who isn't. Just once I wish the reply would be, "I am, your husband kept me up all night." Not very progressive, but hilarious.
I mean. I read the first section, and got to laugh at this hypothetical exchange.
That was worth my time, but I have no clue what the thesis is here.
Heres the rub for you anti-Trumpers, you judge in hindsight that 1. trump was somehow a medical expert. 2. that the vaccines were always bad and trump somehow knew, and 3. that trump was somehow god and could shut down the globalist healthcare agencies.
Voted for Trump. (Really a vote against Hillary, but still) I'm allowed to criticize him without being 'anti-Trump.'
-
Nobody thought Trump was an expert, we thought the experts were lying.
-
The vaccines were untested, and couldn't be tested-- that's what Warp Speed was. Given the track record of all coronavirus vaccines "not obviously a disaster" is a "good" outcome, but it's far from the norm for vaccines. Novel Coronavirus is here to stay, and the vaccine is at best ineffective, with both known and unknown side effects, with no active studies using unvaxxed control groups to determine how bad it really is. We get to criticize Trump for not acknowledging that and touting this result as a success. When he says "Get vaccinated!" we can still respond "Get fucked!"
-
Trump could have actively opposed lockdowns instead of initiating Warp Speed; ultimately, he was correct: Federalism was the only policy answer that Trump had, since Blue states were already openly disobeying him prior to the 2020 election. Warp speed accelerated the failure of the medical institutions, but I don't see how failing fast becomes a success.
- The right to try movement is what led to the McCollough treatment (Joe Rogan's "Kitchen Sink").
Correct. And this is your only real point. Right to Try was good.
Now imagine if the lives we'd have saved if we spent the money invested in warp speed on the McCollough treatment instead. (And not used the ventilator-to-graveyard pipeline.)
Trump cannot get over 2020 and he won't talk about pertinent current issues in depth instead he will yell about the fraud that happened in 2020.
It's his own damn fault for surrounding himself with swampy yes-men who lied to him, and also not dealing with social media colluding and aligning against him-- he was aware and had the power to address it, and didn't.
Now he's the left's great satan, and who they want to run.
I'd rather have DeSantis-- someone with a track record of effectiveness.
The people most likely to attend were already deep in the Q rabbit hole-- they WW1GWAG'd right into a trap and were made political prisoners and examples of right at the center of the propaganda piece the incident became.
They thought they were 'the storm,' that Trump would back them, and they got blown out instead. Betrayed and abused by the system.
Makes me agree with Kennedy: "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
The Uniparty and the 'fortification' of elections won on Jan 6th, while Trump proved (between this and operation warp speed) that he won't be saving us when push comes to shove.
It was a day for black pills.
Similarly within Leftism, the complaint about chinese presence within Leftism is irrelevant. So is the the complaint about jews presence within Leftism. The dominance of whites within Leftism is worse than that of jews, but you don't want to see it, because you don't want to accept that the problem isn't jews... it's Leftists. It's an ideology that seeks for the eradication of the jew as much as it seeks for the eradication of the white or the Christian.
You peg me one layer too high in the dig for the root of all evil. I spoke of evil, particularly, for one reason only: Jew or Gentile, it needs opposition.
There exists a very particular bent of post-Rabbinical intellectual that seeks to bind God with His own laws. You're right that the behavior is hardly limited to Jews. That spiritual 'Will to Power' now wears the form of Leftism; power is the religion at its core. I suppose the raw root of it would be Satanism, perhaps Saturnism, if you want to go further back than even then Judaism.
I don't really care much about the average God-fearing Jew. It's those who carry the intellectual water of the Devil that scare me-- those 'brave' and Godless intellectuals, be they Jew or Gentile. Your combinations of Rothschild with the Shabbos Goy and the Klaus Schwabs of the world who willingly craft a cage for all of us to be tortured in.
In your terms, I oppose all those who would make a hell out of earth in the name of establishing a utopia. You know, on account of their intent to make a hell out of earth.
You're right: it's ultimately about intent, not ethnicity.
So, too, the parallels between WEF policy proposals and the enslavement of Goy in the Talmud must be... pure coincidence.
I mean, if you want to talk about white clusterfucks, the French Revolution is ground zero for a pretty big crater, so yes. I agree with you there. There's plenty of white culpability for Leftism, more so if you take that as a starting point.
However, when you look at the shoot of leftism cultivated by Jewish Intellectuals, brought to fruition in the USSR by Lenin, to the detriment and death of tens of millions of Christian Slavs, no-- the roots of Communism in white Leftism do not excuse Jewish involvement in the cultivation of its deadly ideology.
Whites could well have poisoned themselves lethally with Leftism on their own-- but that's not the timeline we live in. Jewish thought leaders have long had a leading role in directing the rot and revolution through the financial, trade, and law sectors-- which you mentioned. Claiming that an evil is derived from a broader category of earlier evil doesn't mean it shouldn't still be derided as evil-- you don't get to point at Jacobins and disregard the role of Jews in the evils of the USSR and communism more broadly. That's a genetic fallacy.
I'm not minimizing the role of Whites indoctrinated as Communists, either. I would like to point out they were educated into those positions. The other sector you failed to mention as being a bastion of Jewish influence is the Academy. Education's subversion and the fall of the Ivory Towers of to anti-western sentiment, the weaponization of critique, and the turning of Western intellect against its body politic? I wonder which Ethnic group is disproportionally responsible for that?
No. That's not how any of this works. No traditionalists are claiming women will save us. That's a strawman.
You don't blame the many for the crimes of the few. That's the principle at play.
For the nth time, the women are a catspaw for the leftists, the communists. They use women because of societal bias and women's in group bias to chip away at rights, because the identity politics gets a voting block behind it. Voting blocks matter in a republic that votes.
It's not women. It's the people saying 'won't you think of the wahmen and chillunz' and being listened to by the electorate.
You need to look at Women like a trojan horse, and ask what ideology is inside-- but you stop at the pair of tits and decry the child bearing half of humanity. It's even stupider than the 'trad cuck' nonsense you claim they preach.
You throw out the babies with the bathwater, because without women there is no future as a species.