A step in the right direction, but what we truly need is a legal ban on all "gender affirming care" to people under 18 years old. No puberty blockers. No hormones. Nothing. You're forced to live according to the laws of God and nature until you're 18, and if you're still crazy by that point, you can cut your tits and dick off or whatever, as long as it isn't on the taxpayer's dime.
How about we ban all gender affirming care, regardless of age? And then we can get the people who have been lied to and manipulated the actual mental health they deserve.
Adults of presumably sound mind should be free to harm themselves in whatever way they see fit.
We must draw the line, however, at the promotion of sex-change mutilations, not with punitive laws but with the weight of argument and public opinion, which is completely opposed to the movement, excepting the loud minority that's captured the whore media.
"Bans" are a tool of the totalitarian left (redundant).
Absolutely prohibit by law the abuse of children by sending them to "affirmation" butchers and prohibit sending children to groomers to accept a dick in the ass or tranny ideology, by drag queens or anyone else.
They don’t want help because they’ve been coddled into believing they’re healthy by people who are more akin to butchers than physicians.
Do you think this nonsense happened in the same way in the 1800s? No. It didn’t. They had degenerates, but they rightfully hid that from society or faced appropriate consequences.
The UK already had this fight, the TERFs won in court. They don't need to worry about being ripped off their pedestal.
What are you even talking about? You always claim that the womans hate your transgender kind because they're deathly afraid that 'their privileges'... to shower without a fetishist with an erect penis being present, or woman-only scholarships, would disappear.
They can mutilate as many kids as they want then demand those grown kids are treated like abominations, because the court said so.
Which court said that abominations should be treated like abominations?
Some... have speculated. It makes a certain kind of perverse sense. If one were a woman who 'transitioned' to being male and had her body absolutely ruined, the one solace would be to persuade yourself that women are pure evil, and that whatever horrid, mutilated creature you are now, at least you are not that.
Woman-only scholarships aren't just a privilege, they're illegal under sex discrimination law.
Misdirection. How about you address the point? You claimed the women were really mad at MTT, because they almost lost "their privileges". Now you claim they want as many MTTs as possible. So what happened there?
The UK ruled that those with Gender Critical beliefs cannot be discriminated against.
And you turned this into "treating the troons like abominations". See? You really shouldn't wonder why people think that you are transgendered.
daily reminder that the US government openly mocked people for taking ivermectin off label. all tranny treatment is either off-label (in the case of hormone pills) or not FDA approved for literally anything (for example, GRS).
Remember when you had the boy in class that was a little effeminate but was otherwise an ok kid or the tomboy girl that would play football with the lads.
Remember when we didn't immediately put them on a list to be dosed with hormones and be set up for a surgery later to ironically fit a gender norm while sterilising them. They were much saner times.
Say, how come the 'masters of the universe' permitted so many of 'their own' to be cut up for so many years? There are thousands and thousands of girls who got disfigured. Far more than boys who got castrated.
Hell, they say "if at a later age, you want breasts, you can get surgery for that". It's insane.
Yes? ROGD affects girls, which is why there are several times as many girls now 'transitioning' than boys.
Of course, you were probably cheering. "TAKE THAT, WOMANS! How does it feel that YOUR OWN are now being disfigured. The traps that you laid for US are now being used to destroy YOUR OWN kind!"
Like I said, only illegal when it harms the ruling class.
Da Jooz? The Welsh? Lizards?
If it didn't affect anyone else, I'd love for people like you to get your TERF wins, and your puppet Republican presidents. You'd see very shortly what kind of people you were enabling.
Do give me your predictions.
Crossing the aisle is unacceptable.
Trump crossed the aisle to get a infrastructure bill, which he then didn't.
A step in the right direction, but what we truly need is a legal ban on all "gender affirming care" to people under 18 years old. No puberty blockers. No hormones. Nothing. You're forced to live according to the laws of God and nature until you're 18, and if you're still crazy by that point, you can cut your tits and dick off or whatever, as long as it isn't on the taxpayer's dime.
How about we ban all gender affirming care, regardless of age? And then we can get the people who have been lied to and manipulated the actual mental health they deserve.
Adults of presumably sound mind should be free to harm themselves in whatever way they see fit.
We must draw the line, however, at the promotion of sex-change mutilations, not with punitive laws but with the weight of argument and public opinion, which is completely opposed to the movement, excepting the loud minority that's captured the whore media.
"Bans" are a tool of the totalitarian left (redundant).
Absolutely prohibit by law the abuse of children by sending them to "affirmation" butchers and prohibit sending children to groomers to accept a dick in the ass or tranny ideology, by drag queens or anyone else.
They don’t want help because they’ve been coddled into believing they’re healthy by people who are more akin to butchers than physicians.
Do you think this nonsense happened in the same way in the 1800s? No. It didn’t. They had degenerates, but they rightfully hid that from society or faced appropriate consequences.
And like Tavistock there will be a new clinic hiring all the same acolytes doing the same thing.
Why? Aren't you always claiming that MTT are a huge danger to "women's privileges"?
What are you even talking about? You always claim that the womans hate your transgender kind because they're deathly afraid that 'their privileges'... to shower without a fetishist with an erect penis being present, or woman-only scholarships, would disappear.
Which court said that abominations should be treated like abominations?
Some... have speculated. It makes a certain kind of perverse sense. If one were a woman who 'transitioned' to being male and had her body absolutely ruined, the one solace would be to persuade yourself that women are pure evil, and that whatever horrid, mutilated creature you are now, at least you are not that.
Misdirection. How about you address the point? You claimed the women were really mad at MTT, because they almost lost "their privileges". Now you claim they want as many MTTs as possible. So what happened there?
And you turned this into "treating the troons like abominations". See? You really shouldn't wonder why people think that you are transgendered.
I assume that 'not safe' they mean 'waiting times are exposing transgender children to the deadly effects of puberty'.
It's true. 100% of the people who undergo puberty will eventually die.
daily reminder that the US government openly mocked people for taking ivermectin off label. all tranny treatment is either off-label (in the case of hormone pills) or not FDA approved for literally anything (for example, GRS).
Remember when you had the boy in class that was a little effeminate but was otherwise an ok kid or the tomboy girl that would play football with the lads.
Remember when we didn't immediately put them on a list to be dosed with hormones and be set up for a surgery later to ironically fit a gender norm while sterilising them. They were much saner times.
Rekt
the house may be gone, but are the termites?
"Oo's 'e fink 'e is, the Marquis of bloody Tavistock?"--Terence Stamp in "The Limey"
Say, how come the 'masters of the universe' permitted so many of 'their own' to be cut up for so many years? There are thousands and thousands of girls who got disfigured. Far more than boys who got castrated.
Hell, they say "if at a later age, you want breasts, you can get surgery for that". It's insane.
Yes? ROGD affects girls, which is why there are several times as many girls now 'transitioning' than boys.
Of course, you were probably cheering. "TAKE THAT, WOMANS! How does it feel that YOUR OWN are now being disfigured. The traps that you laid for US are now being used to destroy YOUR OWN kind!"
No... like I said, when there's a huge explosion in the number because it's suddenly trendy, you go investigate it.
And GC are the only feminists who will object to boys being mutilated. You hate them for it. One wonders why.
How big is your wife's strap?
It's a wonder to me how often you'll simp for bitches who hate you.
You can hate trannies and sexually deviant men and ALSO bitches who hate you. None of those are mutually exclusive.
They generally weren't mutilated, the girls were.
Yeah, cause there was an absolute explosion in the number of girls.
It's true like it's true that DeSantis is bribed and blackmailed by feminists, and it's 'not insane' like the same.
Rates of castration and mastectomies.
Da Jooz? The Welsh? Lizards?
Do give me your predictions.
Trump crossed the aisle to get a infrastructure bill, which he then didn't.
You blithering idiot. If Trump can't cross the aisle, because he is not a legislator, DeSantis certainly can't cross the aisle either. He is governor.