Forget about the context and who I am, and just focus on this.
A Republican Governor defied the chair of his state party and the majority of the state GOP to take sides with an openly Democratic Party aligned organization.
So DeSantis stood up against his own party doing things the wrong way. That bill was upsetting established law post facto, without instituting better law moving forward. You are arguing opposing that law means that he's in the pocket of feminists?
You know that broken clocks are sometimes right, but if a feminist agrees on the time, the broken clock is now a traitor to all mankind according to your logic.
This just emphasizes DeSantis votes his convictions, not lockstep party policy. Even though he was lobbied hard to veto the bill, it's a good veto in principle because state legislatures shouldn't restrict judges in their verdicts or in the administration of existing law.
Okay, so it's related to your mono-mania.
In the interest of fairness, what was the bill? SB 1796?
Forget about the context and who I am, and just focus on this.
A Republican Governor defied the chair of his state party and the majority of the state GOP to take sides with an openly Democratic Party aligned organization.
It was SB1796, yes.
So DeSantis stood up against his own party doing things the wrong way. That bill was upsetting established law post facto, without instituting better law moving forward. You are arguing opposing that law means that he's in the pocket of feminists?
You know that broken clocks are sometimes right, but if a feminist agrees on the time, the broken clock is now a traitor to all mankind according to your logic.
This just emphasizes DeSantis votes his convictions, not lockstep party policy. Even though he was lobbied hard to veto the bill, it's a good veto in principle because state legislatures shouldn't restrict judges in their verdicts or in the administration of existing law.
I invite you to read his memo providing his reason for it: https://archive.ph/M2w6W