9
Arkana 9 points ago +10 / -1

It's natural to look out for your family and care for their well being. When villages and cities were populated only by a single people group that includes them as an extended family in what Aristotle called philia.

To say that one should not care for their extended family the same as they would for their close relatives is foolish at best and hateful at worst.

Our current society is one with low levels of racial solidarity and extremely high levels of propping up the weak. In a society with significant solidarity people would know when they are being a detriment to those around them. Which happens in many cultures with extreme environments like arctic or desert where they cannot tolerate somebody taking up resources and not contributing to their people.

6
Arkana 6 points ago +6 / -0

I believe this will be the case as well. A guaranteed income isn't always bad, Alaska has something like that with oil money, but with the people currently in power it will be nothing good.

Anything people have in cash savings will be heavily devalued, and most people will be entirely reliant on the government as an income source. This would likely come into play with a new "digital currency" as well, which wouldn't have some of the benefits that current cryptocurrencies have.

4
Arkana 4 points ago +9 / -5

Very good post. I believe that Trump was first elected on actual populism and the establishment did not want to accept any change. It's very telling that Trump went from "Drain the swamp" by bringing in many outsiders like Bannon, to suddenly getting rid of them and bringing back many swamp creatures. It feels like during his first 2 years he ended up making some kind of backroom deal to stop pushing things in the way he was. In exchange for what I have no idea.

Trump can come out and stand up for white people, or else he is supporting the current regime. Unless he properly addresses the election fraud and the legal failure to have anything at all happen, there is no reason for anybody to support him in any way.

I hope he comes out with a very sanitized campaign and people reject him. Which will leave a political and social vacuum for figures better aligned with the will of the majority of people.

17
Arkana 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yeah it's something that many people will try to dismiss in one way or another. It's probably because they have only been taught to think of "nature vs nurture" when the basis of "nurture" is founded in biology as well. Unless they're talking about being nurtured by rocks and inorganic matter.

30
Arkana 30 points ago +30 / -0

As shown by the kinds of virtue signaling that has been happening lately, they don't only care about profits. The stonetoss "Burgers?" comic is a perfect distillation of that.

The people who control the banks and government have essentially unlimited funds. Money can accomplish a lot, but there is a limit. That's why you get into things like blackmail and illegal goods to tempt and control people who can't just be won over with money.

It will always come back to race because your brain is biological. The kind of brain you have is determined or at least heavily influenced by your parents and their lineage. This means culture and ultimately "class" are expressions of an underlying biology.

22
Arkana 22 points ago +22 / -0

I never said there was any grand plan linking everything, just that it's a common tactic that has been used heavily since at least the 1960's. It's only in recent years with the internet that actual truth has been able to leak through the cracks and reach many people.

Also there can definitely be groups that want to use this to push something specific. The government does not want people to heavily doubt them. Atheists do not want people to believe in religion. And with GamerGate (and other journalism) it's pretty clear that private mailing lists dictate what is acceptable to publish and what narratives should be supported.

42
Arkana 42 points ago +42 / -0

It's the same formula that's been used elsewhere. Use something like aliens and flat earth to conflate with people who are suspicious of the FBI and CIA. Use the westboro baptist church and creationists to conflate with all christians. The same was used against GamerGate by painting everybody as "bigoted trolls who just harass women" ignoring anybody with legitimate concerns.

Meanwhile they try to "fact check" every single instance which goes against their narratives saying "Oh no that was caused by something totally different!" and brush it under the rug.

22
Arkana 22 points ago +22 / -0

They won't considering who owns the banks and investor capital. And even when the banks fail we know the government just bails them out. There's a reason that some companies can go over a decade without any actual profit as long as it has a monopoly position and can influence a lot of people.

31
Arkana 31 points ago +31 / -0

The French Revolution tends to be known as the first major event in recent history which "inverted" things and it kept growing from there.

The average person is easily convinced. People are much worse at critical thinking and self-doubt than they would like to admit. This is why democracy ends up as "Rule by people who can most influence the masses" and why modern politics is basically just theater.

And I would recommend watching Asha Logos Subverted History series which goes over some parts of history that academia does not want to touch.

18
Arkana 18 points ago +18 / -0

One large issue I can see (and many people here seem unaware of as well) is conflating race only with skin color. Race is a broad word talking about someone's overall biological ancestry, not just their physical appearance. With the biggest difference being internal organs, especially the brain.

19
Arkana 19 points ago +21 / -2

The firebombing of Tokyo and Dresden are two things you won't hear much about either, those are some real atrocities.

The USA government defeats a country through warfare and then forces them to accept "universal goods" like equal rights and democracy against their will. I wonder how many people would call that "cultural imperialism" unless they supported those themselves.

47
Arkana 47 points ago +47 / -0

This is definitely the case from what I know. You can thank the Allies for making their workplaces more "diverse" and enshrining equal rights into their constitution. When men see that society is no longer working for their benefit and instead at their expense, they would check out of society and not engage with it.

16
Arkana 16 points ago +16 / -0

Largely accurate. However it's missing the key racial element which makes everything else fall into place. Many of the "global elite" genuinely do not think they are the same as the rest of the regular citizens. They intermarry and view the general population as a threat to them, which is true.

When people realize that their government has been hijacked by a foreign power they would rebel, like has happened in the past. Instead for 60 years we have been bombarded with "anti-racist" training to make people ignore or otherwise be unable to see the truth when it comes to people acting out of racial interest at the expense of everybody else.

20
Arkana 20 points ago +20 / -0

Democracy means "Control by people who can influence the masses the most" basically meaning the media and education systems. It's very easy to convince people if you have all "authorities" pointing in the same direction, and saying anybody who looks the other way is a horrible person.

There's a reason the USA was founded as a constitutional republic. They didn't write the constitution with a democracy in mind, that just came afterwards.

1
Arkana 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whenever any single instance grows big enough it will get compromised in the exact same way "big tech" has. They will pressure smaller instances into falling in line or else they will have no reach.

What you are saying is basically to "hope the problem goes away on its own" which it never will. You need to get to the root of the issue of why things get compromised in the first place, and that's something you can't run away from forever.

11
Arkana 11 points ago +11 / -0

Maybe not, but what about traceable dye or some other kind of verification? It doesn't need to be a chip specifically. And there's no guarantee that they won't put things in later once people are "used to it" with regular injections.

1
Arkana 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes Mastodon is one instance, but it's the biggest one of their "twitter alternatives" which means it basically has monopoly power in the same way that twitter actually does. I'm using it as an example that what happened that made twitter and reddit bad is exactly the same thing happening to federated projects as well.

16
Arkana 16 points ago +17 / -1

With the code of conduct on things like Mastodon I do not think you could consider that a good source. They have rules like:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, casteism

No discrimination against gender and sexual minorities, or advocation thereof

No spreading disinformation or conspiracy theories that undermine public health

No conduct promoting the ideology of National Socialism

They are functionally identical to places like Twitter and Reddit in terms of the quality of the people running it. I do use Element/Matrix though since it has encryption. We have a KiA backup room there just in case.

You can see that many "branches" have their content suspended from interacting with Mastodon for things like harassment and hate speech. This is why it is not reliable. If the people moderating things are compromised then anywhere good just gets quarantined away, same as Reddit. Dot Win has reliable admins (for now) so it works well as a public site. It does not solve the issues that people have been having with social media at all.

15
Arkana 15 points ago +15 / -0

Lancet is edited by Richard Horton who is heavily in bed with the Chinese government.

30
Arkana 30 points ago +30 / -0

It seems the admins have been pushing more on censorship again. They really should just be directing people here instead.

12
Arkana 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yeah there have been federal documents released which show their posts on sites like that. I believe they were also trying to get people to download images, either because it provides some kind of tracking or just to see how well they spread from different sources.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›