I'm surprised they're even bothering with doing this. The way the UK is going they should have just made an ad showing the police beating seniors with batons in the street with the caption "you will be made to take the vaccine whether you like it or not".
They're already trotting out the bullshit averts featuring, "grandad and grandma" actors in full "I'm ill" make up and masks with the lines of "You wouldn't do this to your grandparent, would you? Vaccines save lives"
And also overtly stated that it totally allows you to return to sanity. They make every argument at the same time, and then the media plays the ones that are "right" for the moment.
To normalise it. If in say ten years it comes out that some kind of post apocalyptic 1984 civil war does breakout ditching a phone is easier than demicrochipping everyone who took one for the past ten years.
Yes we are being tracked, phones computers etc but those are all user dependent on usage. A microchip, is not. It is at the whim of whoever accesses it.
It's no different to people saying "nothing to fear, nothing to hide"... The point isn't that you have anything to hide.. It's that they shouldn't be "suspecting" you for no reason.
Because the first step is to normalise the concept of it.
As we have seen from many normies they will gladly accept something detrimental to themselves and their freedoms for a little bit of false security.
Ever you ne being microchipped at the moment is in the realm of "tinfoil", purely because the idea isn't normal or mainstream.
Notice how the news media isn't calling the idea tinfoil or conspiracy. They're all simply ly refuting that tracking chips aren't included. This is implicitly acknowledging the idea has solid ground and letting normies "come up with the idea themselves.".
Soon within the next five years, if not sooner you see articles saying "there's no microchip in vaccines tracking you... But.. Wouldn't that be a cool safety idea".
People are more likely to accept something if a) it's talked about openly (instead of taboo/conspiracy) and b) they came up with the idea.
It's a common psychological effect, the same process was used to get people to accept Cctv, slavery, lynching, amongst others. That isn't to mean everyone works this way, some accept the ideas for sakes of power, money income but when targeting the average person, you do so through fear.
The conspiracy theorist fears the highly improbable based on possibility of possibilities.
We could A which could lead to B, then C, then X!
The skeptic fears the possible based on the known.
We have A, which we can see a evidentiary path leading to B.
The normie welcomes those exact fears of the prior two over fears of other things.
WE are afraid of C, so we will accept A in the hopes it stops B.
(See The Networks rant scene "Please please we will. Do whatever you want just leave us alone to our Steel belted radios and our tvs"
Maybe not, but what about traceable dye or some other kind of verification? It doesn't need to be a chip specifically. And there's no guarantee that they won't put things in later once people are "used to it" with regular injections.
For the MRNA version, the string of code that teaches your body how to "deal" with the virus,. Is actually an identifiable marker itself.
Another coded virus could be instructed to do something if the person possesses the prior MRNA string. From addendum ing additional information (yearly updates akin to flu shots) or worse... Dna warfare. Hey you have this set string MRNA.. Hey we found it easy. Now to tell your body you don't need to regenerate specific cells...or to attack specific cells as hostiles.
Not saying that IS what's happening. Just that it's possible. They've been working with genetic markers for decades.
Edit: as an example-- https://www.dmbj.org.rs/jmb/pdf/2014-1/3.pdf.
Covers molecular genetic markers and molecular therapy to cure illness and diseases under "personalised medicine".
The same functions can be used for generalised use too. Just throw in some dead markers that do nothing.
The vaccine conspiracy nonsense makes people look retarded. There are literally millions of doses going around the world. Do people seriously not think people with the capacity to analyze it aren't getting their hands on some? If there was some illuminati shit in it we would know.
But what do I know, I've had my first shot...maybe they already control me.
Only two messages linked to your account and one of them is this strawman derision of some real concerns by invoking the words Illuminati and muh conspiracy theories.
Such as how everyone knows Nixon had the 1960 election stolen from him like Trump, Obama supplied ISIS, Fauci and Daszak were trying to make bat coronaviruses infect humans in North Carolina before moving the research to Wuhan, or that global warming is neomalthusian nonsense for the sake of advancing international communism?
Fauci and Daszak were trying to make bat coronaviruses infect humans in North Carolina before moving the research to Wuhan
I know what you're talking about. My dad uses the source for his coronavirus presentation for his intelligence sector and they told him they couldn't use his source because it didn't exist. The source was the history of the coof before 2020. Do you have an archive or anything on this because I've been searching since they memory holed it back in March? Would appreciate because I at least wanna show my friends, but understandable if you don't.
Thanks so much! My dad, who is a staunch military and government man, was shocked when compiling his presentation back in March last year. Then to have his higher ups turn around and tell him "these sources don't exist."
That is a suspiciously specific denial
If they specifically deny there is a chip in the vaccines randomly, it is likely to think that they do have something to hide.
I'm surprised they're even bothering with doing this. The way the UK is going they should have just made an ad showing the police beating seniors with batons in the street with the caption "you will be made to take the vaccine whether you like it or not".
They're already trotting out the bullshit averts featuring, "grandad and grandma" actors in full "I'm ill" make up and masks with the lines of "You wouldn't do this to your grandparent, would you? Vaccines save lives"
As crazy as it is that they said that, this line from the article is even more concerning to me:
"Oh no, trust us, everything is fine. The vaccine isn't mandatory. You just want to get injected so you can go back to normal, don't you?"
And yet, that is a blatant lie: They've stated overtly that vaccination does not allow you to return to sanity.
And also overtly stated that it totally allows you to return to sanity. They make every argument at the same time, and then the media plays the ones that are "right" for the moment.
This along with people posting every picosecond of their lives on social media chipping seems like a massive waste of time. Plus cameras everywhere.
To normalise it. If in say ten years it comes out that some kind of post apocalyptic 1984 civil war does breakout ditching a phone is easier than demicrochipping everyone who took one for the past ten years. Yes we are being tracked, phones computers etc but those are all user dependent on usage. A microchip, is not. It is at the whim of whoever accesses it.
It's no different to people saying "nothing to fear, nothing to hide"... The point isn't that you have anything to hide.. It's that they shouldn't be "suspecting" you for no reason.
Because the first step is to normalise the concept of it. As we have seen from many normies they will gladly accept something detrimental to themselves and their freedoms for a little bit of false security. Ever you ne being microchipped at the moment is in the realm of "tinfoil", purely because the idea isn't normal or mainstream. Notice how the news media isn't calling the idea tinfoil or conspiracy. They're all simply ly refuting that tracking chips aren't included. This is implicitly acknowledging the idea has solid ground and letting normies "come up with the idea themselves.". Soon within the next five years, if not sooner you see articles saying "there's no microchip in vaccines tracking you... But.. Wouldn't that be a cool safety idea". People are more likely to accept something if a) it's talked about openly (instead of taboo/conspiracy) and b) they came up with the idea. It's a common psychological effect, the same process was used to get people to accept Cctv, slavery, lynching, amongst others. That isn't to mean everyone works this way, some accept the ideas for sakes of power, money income but when targeting the average person, you do so through fear. The conspiracy theorist fears the highly improbable based on possibility of possibilities. We could A which could lead to B, then C, then X! The skeptic fears the possible based on the known. We have A, which we can see a evidentiary path leading to B. The normie welcomes those exact fears of the prior two over fears of other things. WE are afraid of C, so we will accept A in the hopes it stops B. (See The Networks rant scene "Please please we will. Do whatever you want just leave us alone to our Steel belted radios and our tvs"
Healthy people don't need a vaccine anyway.
Maybe not, but what about traceable dye or some other kind of verification? It doesn't need to be a chip specifically. And there's no guarantee that they won't put things in later once people are "used to it" with regular injections.
For the MRNA version, the string of code that teaches your body how to "deal" with the virus,. Is actually an identifiable marker itself. Another coded virus could be instructed to do something if the person possesses the prior MRNA string. From addendum ing additional information (yearly updates akin to flu shots) or worse... Dna warfare. Hey you have this set string MRNA.. Hey we found it easy. Now to tell your body you don't need to regenerate specific cells...or to attack specific cells as hostiles. Not saying that IS what's happening. Just that it's possible. They've been working with genetic markers for decades.
Edit: as an example-- https://www.dmbj.org.rs/jmb/pdf/2014-1/3.pdf. Covers molecular genetic markers and molecular therapy to cure illness and diseases under "personalised medicine".
The same functions can be used for generalised use too. Just throw in some dead markers that do nothing.
'Don't worry, the guns not loaded, now if I could just press it to the back of your head and pull the trigger, don't worry, it's not loaded okay'?
The vaccine conspiracy nonsense makes people look retarded. There are literally millions of doses going around the world. Do people seriously not think people with the capacity to analyze it aren't getting their hands on some? If there was some illuminati shit in it we would know.
But what do I know, I've had my first shot...maybe they already control me.
Only two messages linked to your account and one of them is this strawman derision of some real concerns by invoking the words Illuminati and muh conspiracy theories.
Hello glowie kun.
So do you have an argument beside post history stalking and ad hominems?
Get back to filling out your paperwork you federal faggot.
I'd much rather get back to playing video games while I pretend to telework.
Thanks for paying my salary.
You make an asinine statement ridiculing concerns about vaccines by invoking the words Illuminati and conspiracy theory.
Of course the next thing I would do is check your post history.
Lo and behold this nonsense is one of your only two comments.
Doesn't seem regular to me.
I'll take that as a no.
Such as how everyone knows Nixon had the 1960 election stolen from him like Trump, Obama supplied ISIS, Fauci and Daszak were trying to make bat coronaviruses infect humans in North Carolina before moving the research to Wuhan, or that global warming is neomalthusian nonsense for the sake of advancing international communism?
I know what you're talking about. My dad uses the source for his coronavirus presentation for his intelligence sector and they told him they couldn't use his source because it didn't exist. The source was the history of the coof before 2020. Do you have an archive or anything on this because I've been searching since they memory holed it back in March? Would appreciate because I at least wanna show my friends, but understandable if you don't.
Here is a 2015 Nature article about the successful US research.
Thanks so much! My dad, who is a staunch military and government man, was shocked when compiling his presentation back in March last year. Then to have his higher ups turn around and tell him "these sources don't exist."
Huh. Neat. Shame no one will read it, take it seriously or bad faith deBoonk
We vill not build a vall, nobodyy has en intention to build a vall.