Unions are a parasitical corporation grafted onto something else. They are to be avoided if possible, and any company or industry that lets a union develop is already unhealthy.
I don't think anti-trust will ever be used for the sake of the public. At this point it will only ever be done for the sake of the government. If the government is personally threatened by a business they will use anti-trust to cripple it or install their people in key positions to take it over.
Because if they're smart enough they will lie, subvert, and parasitize the society. When you have many strong individuals they will underestimate the power of working together and undermining powerful institutions. Some key areas are banking, news, and education.
They will act as gatekeepers and prevent those strong individuals from rising to the top, because they do not have a support structure of other people looking out for them. This is how a meritocratic society no longer becomes meritocratic.
Because people that preform worse still want more. And since they lack the ability to preform as individuals. That means they likely will work more in a tribal manner to ensure they get ahead compared to others, even if they don't deserve it as much.
Things that are not equal should not be considered equal. You can give people an equal opportunity, but that's different than believing they are the same inherently. That is equity and it's why people are saying men and women are identical.
Simply don't shy away from stereotypes, especially when they coincide with reliable data.
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
If anybody wants to know about how the National Socialists thought of women you can read Goebbels thoughts here. With some key segments:
We do not see the woman as inferior, but as having a different mission, a different value, than that of the man.
No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and breadwinning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is not to disparage women, only to recognise how she best uses her talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past years of Germany’s decline, we come to the frightening, nearly terrifying, conclusion that the less German men were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminisation of men always leads to the masculinisation of women.
The first, best, and most suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation’s source of strength, the woman is its core and centre. The best place for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family, in motherhood.
German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more rights but fewer duties.
It's true. Not based on racial hatred, but on racial differences. To give everybody a chance and only select from the best will mean that one group succeeds more than others.
This is why white people are better swimmers, africans are better runners, etc. These kinds of racial differences must be recognized and accounted for.
Trump was a central figure, but he did not oppose the right issues. He thought that economy was more important than other areas, which is incorrect to some degree. He also did not come out in full support or opposition to q-anon and during his term almost entirely neglected rural white americans which were the reason he was elected at all.
Not to say that he was bad. He shows many positives towards rallying people and other caveats to consider. I think he did deserve a 2nd term and that the election was stolen from him, but he will not be the figure to give the public a call to action.
Some degree of central effort is needed. People need to rally behind individuals with certain values in mind. One main problem of "the right" is that it's all spread out rural with no actual communications network outside of local talk.
I don't think people like who you have named accomplish that, which is why I don't watch them. Their goal is to have a discussion and reach things through "reasonable terms" which will never happen, it will only be slow capitulation.
If everybody is isolated and not pointed in the same direction then no great efforts can be accomplished. The problem is getting a rallying figure that will actually be able to do something meaningful about the issues we currently face.
Yes this exactly. At some point it will likely be illegal to own a non-automatic car. They will say oh it's for reducing auto accidents. Either that or they will increase the price exponentially and make the automatic option as cheap as possible.
Everything for the sake of influencing people. People like dogs so lets adopt some and make horrible PR tweets about it. Oh nobody actually cared about the dog and it was stressed out so it attacked people, who could have seen that happen!
I don't really trust any leaked documents, there's a way higher chance of them being fake than real in the modern day.
The WEF is the one pushing the "Great Reset" stuff, and they're just one group. No single group controls everything, it's generally done by alliances of people as long as they have mutually agreed upon goals or ideals.
4chan specifically has been heavily botted since 2015 or so. I only briefly went there before, and /pol/ currently has massive amounts of things like forum sliding and worthless posts that are just meant to prevent actual discussion.
I believe that Twitter, Reddit, and Facebook also have bots to some degree. Likely to inflate numbers and generate a fake consensus. At the very least they are moderated to prevent organic growth from happening. Like Twitter's trends generally have to be approved or Youtube's tending page which is only filled with corporate bullshit.
It's been clear that these lockdowns are just being used to create their "Great reset" which is the plan to create a global governance and undermine national unity.
This is why you will see increasingly restricted travel. First from airplanes, then with cars. The justification will only be the "pandemic" as long as it's useful. Then they will move on to something else, like a cyber hacking event in order to censor the internet further.
The people in the governments are not doing anything, because there is nothing they can do. Some of the real people calling the shots are the ones who run major multinational companies. They have far more resources, ability to influence the public, and less restrictions on what they are legally able to do.
I've done some 3D modeling and texture making, as well as some programming in Game Maker. This is a small game I've been working on, it's like Final Fantasy Tactics.
I wouldn't want to be a main developer I think, but I wouldn't mind helping out if anybody needs some work done.
Yeah, a company is never going to go bankrupt as long as it has support from the money printers.