2
APDSmith 2 points ago +2 / -0

It has been shown multiple times that not all women are fit to be mothers

The problem is that this runs headlong into conflict with feminist scripture - that all members of the "women" socio-religious movement are pure beings of light only corrupted by the touch of the devil man.

Every single institution you know is a fully-paid up member of this cult and, for them, it's easier for them to ruin your life than it is for them to check their assumptions.

6
APDSmith 6 points ago +6 / -0

a bachelor tax

Would that not simply make all men the property of the state?

Having to pay a tax for a state of existence is a bit much, no?

20
APDSmith 20 points ago +20 / -0

It's a bit of both, I think.

They're trying to build a world in which you will consume the media, because otherwise all the interlinked systems of governance, finance and education will ostracise you and seize everything you have. A world in which, even if you didn't get the message that your role is to die out gracefully and leave everything you own to the freshly-imported population, your children will not be allowed to chance to grow up into anybody who might have children of their own.

If you accept this dystopia as the inexorable march of progress, getting a head-start so that you can keep competitors out is only sensible.

10
APDSmith 10 points ago +10 / -0

Rule #3 of feminism: The problems that feminists today lay at the feet of men arise from yesterday's feminists.

20
APDSmith 20 points ago +21 / -1

Oh no! Dad has dad bod!

Also, if your child is "toxic" ... guess who's fault that is? If your child is some kind of uncivilised feral, that's on you dude

14
APDSmith 14 points ago +14 / -0

Why do Democrat women always seem to lie?

Because nobody at all in their constituency will ever hold them to account for doing so.

Under those circumstances, the best liar is going to win, aren't they?

6
APDSmith 6 points ago +6 / -0

At the moment, it's looking unlikely

However

If the DNC guys maintain their capture of the Federal government and use it to dictate terms the states - even the solid red ones - are unable to avoid - then they'd have to at least consider secession, if they're part of a Federal system that actively seeks their elimination, wouldn't they?

27
APDSmith 27 points ago +28 / -1

because of natural demographic forces

Well, I don't think it's Da Jooz, but it's not natural forces. Both the US and UK governments are wilfully refusing to address the topic of mass immigration.

One presumes that this is because they're quite content to hazard their old populations to curry favour with the new ones. See Rotherham et al in the UK. Just point-blank refusing to deal with it because it's politically inconvenient - I mean, it's only white working class girls who are being raped on an industrial scale. Not like it's anyone that matters

31
APDSmith 31 points ago +31 / -0

and that ‘native-born white people are being replaced by immigrants’ — a racist belief known as the ‘great replacement theory’.

... how is this a "conspiracy theory" when you have mainstream media celebrating the fact that they're successfully driving the "white" (again, this is a crap grouping, but that's not the point here) US and UK populations into extinction?

2
APDSmith 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is that a surprise? US media have spent decades spending their trust in order to advance their agenda. The fact that they've not achieved as much as they wanted is probably something they object to, but the principle of the thing is something they chose.

10
APDSmith 10 points ago +10 / -0

... you wonder if that would have been better off inverted, with the optics "under" the barrel.

2
APDSmith 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ahh, but Congress gets held to account in elections. People like this much prefer it when they can simply have an unelected clique dictate policy without letting those fucking voters have a say in things.

Because remember, it's about protecting Our Democracy™

1
APDSmith 1 point ago +1 / -0

One presumes that, as far as politico are concerned, those are no longer "the public" and merely "deplorables" - I expect Politico is very disappointed they're still even allowed to vote...

7
APDSmith 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's "might makes right" ever-so-slightly dressed up.

4
APDSmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

I do wonder if NY antifa or BLM are going to amuse themselves by ruining this guy's life. Contemptible as that is, they don't seem to have anything better to do with their time...

13
APDSmith 13 points ago +13 / -0

Well, no, it's not about proving any case.

It's about using the might of government to get somebody imprisoned and sentenced to probation because they disagreed with you.

32
APDSmith 32 points ago +32 / -0

... and, unsurprisingly, the people who feel entitled to dictate that opinion - regardless of what the public themselves feel about it - are all kinds of pissed off at this fact?

14
APDSmith 14 points ago +14 / -0

Oh, so this is unilateral action by the office of the president.

Does he actually get to do that, or is this one of those things where he gets to do it until somebody asks if he can, at which point there's a court case, and the Biden administration gets put back in it's box?

22
APDSmith 22 points ago +22 / -0

See, I keep seeing talk about this, but what does it mean?

Is this "The Biden administration is going to suspend elements of the US constitution for an ill-defined duration" or is it just PR talk, the Biden administration attempting to bully individual states into surrendering their constitutional rights to Federal government using the power of rhetoric alone?

8
APDSmith 8 points ago +8 / -0

The real question: Did he commit and go for lighting his farts afterwards?

10
APDSmith 10 points ago +10 / -0

The thing is, the "mouth" thing, I understand. If you're a true moron you might try and siphon a petrol station pump. Wouldn't work, but yeah, I get that.

The other one? Hell if I know. I have no intention of Googling "siphon petrol using rectum"

2
APDSmith 2 points ago +2 / -0

I suspect that's because you're not factoring the share prices of several giant corporations into your calculations.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›