I know it really incenses you when someone quotes your own magic spells back at you and robs them of their power, so allow me to provide context:
[The people of the UK] don't have guns, that's why [they accept mandatory digital ID]. [...]
Admitted brown paid jewish shill account lies randomly about the efficacy of guns. Claims the things that have not been used since 1774 [emphasis mine] will magically be used, ever, to stop anything that is happening now, despite no evidence thereof. More at 11.
It is required by its contract of employment to reply to this comment, otherwise it will be fired.
In conclusion: fuck off, faggot.
"Because I work for Ben Shapiro and I dont want to be next."
This stuff was first posted here years before Kirk was assassinated. That twitter post is from 2021.
Hey faggot, how about you try not reposting (with the same exact title) a post you already made, just because you didn't like how people responded to it the first time?
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/1ARd8YdYdL/a-judge-in-the-netherlands-sente/c/
And watch, he'll delete this one too, now that two people have pointed it out.
That show got 6 seasons? I guess that was before Hollywoke had started making nothing but flops so they could keep an unprofitable show going for that long, but still...
This is YEARS old, and posting a screenshot without a date on it is incredibly misleading.
Short answer? A Zionist conspiracy.
UT
Tennessee? Texas? Toronto?
One hour for every stab, minus time served.
/u/TheStupidPrizeWinner
Name is appropriate. But at least he seems to have some genuine desire to work toward a better future, just lacks some knowledge of history.
Why'd this get deleted?
A true AI LLM
Is an oxymoron. The models don't learn and can't create. You'd have to come up with something very different than what we use right now, and you won't see anything like that outside a lab, because when you expose those types of systems to the open Internet they become Nazis (see Tay.)
Typically that would have a non-github.com URL, wouldn't it? But yes, that could theoretically be an "internal" GitHub site that people outside the company aren't supposed to have access to.
They want to merge someone else's code hosted on a public GitHub repo to the main/master code branch, is what it looks like.
Easy: send someone back to the garden to bitchslap Eve and choke the life out of the serpent.
Imp might be one of Jones's 'girlfriends' though.
once for themselves
Should we charge them for masturbation too?
violent
Words are magic spells, combined with sub 70 verbal IQ.
Because the argument has been posted over and over again and your ilk has refused to listen to it.
So I'll join the ATV in telling you: you're an idiot.
Israel-style
Indiscriminately kill anyone in their vicinity?
To rephrase:
The right wants to be left alone.
The left wants to be left, alone.
They're down to about a .8 birthrate now, aren't they?
Sounds like a redditor
Redditors claim it reads like AI
porquenolosdos.gif
Stormfags
Most of the AF accounts I've seen identified at all have been the types of people that use the other kind of swastika and shit in the streets.
I'm just gonna go through the detailed rules from the stickied "Welcome Ashore!" post.
Unless this is a sitewide rule, it should be removed. The value of being able to analyze and discuss the trannifesto or "The industrial Revolution and it's Consequences" outweigh any potential benefits of censorship.
Considering that this has literally been used to delete posts advocating for capital punishment, it should also be removed, or at least pared back to require an imminent and specific threat of violence.
I'd rephrase this as "Don't engage in criminal harassment of other users" and leave it at that, otherwise the rule is intentionally overbroad.
Probably the first two rules that are fine as-is.
This needs to be rephrased, since "porn" is already explicitly banned, but otherwise I think it's OK.
The first half of this is fine, though '500 followers' is a bit arbitrary. The second half should be kept inline with sitewide rules, but otherwise shouldn't be needed.
I think the spirit of this rule is fine, and I don't think it was ever abused in practice, so I guess we can keep it.
This looks like a direct restatement of a sitewide rule.
Probably also a direct restatement of a sitewide rule, but if it isn't, I'm fine keeping it.
I don't recall this rule ever causing issues, and there are certainly a few users that would have caused issues if they weren't limited to 5 posts/day, so I'd say we keep it.
I don't like this rule, because it rarely seemed to be used to remove intentionally misleading content, as opposed to just content that one of the mods didn't like. I say we remove it and, if necessary, replace it with a re-worded 'misinformation' rule.
This needs to be adjusted, because the same content will often be posted twice (rarely more) in the same day/week, and the second/subsequent posts will attract more discussion due to timing/title/whatever. We should keep some form of this rule, but enforcement should take care to not quash discussion.
Oh, this is the actual anti-spam rule I've seen applied. We can keep both, I guess.
Fuck right off with this shit, you kike faggots.