Not going to watch this, but I assume that he's not talking about the lone-gunman non-conspiracy (not counting the message board with people predicting the day of his murder) theory with holes bigger than a 30-06 exit wound?
He addresses people predicting the day of his murder and the exit would. His stance is things are not clear cut but it is not something like the CIA, FBI or Mossad because they would not let him live or use a different caliber in case of a second shooter, the guy is not screaming he is not guilty and his parents are not defending him.
Was he pushed to do it by a fed? Who knows but the rest seems unlikely.
Still, why would they allow him to live rather then get the same treatment as Trump's assassin, that was a lot more fishy then what happen to Charlie Kirk and yet people are focused more on Charlie's assassin. Why?
Honestly, I don't know. It might have something to do with the rest of his network completely avoiding charges. Like either they'd have to kill 8 people in a short span of time or arrest him alive.
Also Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested, then killed later. Epstein was arrested multiple times, then finally killed. James Earl Ray was never killed. And we know two of those were patsies.
Not saying he was not pushed but does not seem like a second shooter existed or that the guy was being framed and we have no info on being pushed. I'm also concerned that we know that Trump's assassin was pushed to do it online, there is a username to track and yet why is everyone focused on Charlie's assassin and not Trump's?
Not saying he was not pushed but does not seem like a second shooter existed or that the guy was being framed and we have no info on being pushed.
Idk about a second shooter, but his boyfriend and other trannies definitely knew about it, judging from their "Charlie Kirk Dead at 31 on 9/10" posts a week before the murder.
I'm also concerned that we know that Trump's assassin was pushed to do it online, there is a username to track and yet why is everyone focused on Charlie's assassin and not Trump's?
Well, Trump is still alive and he's not trying to solve his assassination attempt (because he knows who did it and he doesn't want to solve it). Can't really help a guy who doesn't help himself.
With Butler, it's easy to understand that whatshisface climbed on the roof and took the shot. Very hard to understand why nobody stopped him, but what else can we do at this point but speculate about it, without interviewing the Secret Service agents ourselves? Perhaps Tucker will find some online footprint the feds didn't scrub.
Charlie, on the other hand, was fighting for truth and got murdered for it. Also a more recent assassination with even more obvious inconsistencies. Most people are choosing to fight for Charlie.
For example, the FBI says Robinson smuggled a Mauser 98 onto the roof in his pants and backpack. It is physically impossible (even when broken down) to conceal that gun in the pants and backpack in the photos.
It's so obvious that he was set up to die as the Marriage Martyr™. The ideology was incredibly unpopular and needed an emotional thing to rally behind.
The world feels precarious and on a razor's edge if one person could do this. Almost anybody could be killed at almost any time.
Well that's how it is, and it's cowardly to pretend otherwise. One crazy liberal could sneak a long gun onto a roof in public past a security team. Easily.
The bullet is weird and should be explained, and could just be a one in a million thing, but everything else is not even a stretch. Crazy liberal wants to kill somebody because they're saying 'mean words'? Uh, yeah, where have you been the last ten years.
Why is there so much belated inorganic ballistics sperging over Kirk's shooting months later?
Why isn't there more focus on Trump’s shooter when the stakes were much higher, the shooter so much more dysgenic, the Secret Service security perimeter failure so much more egregious, etc?
Because Candace Owens leaked texts that made it possible to suspect Israel was involved over a month later, and TPUSA seemingly confirmed their validity, so the guys who scream that Israel is behind every stubbed toe were able to swarm into the topic and make every single aspect be a question.
And because most people get all their thinking and opinions done for them through talking heads like Owens or Walsh, its now a constant topic of discussion because its now part of that grift for these types to clickbait you into their sphere.
Trump's one got buried hard, just like the second shooter that came shortly after that got busted that no one remembers, so the masses didn't get any of the questionable aspects of that downloaded from their favorite Tweeter to talk about.
Trump's one got buried hard, just like the second shooter that came shortly after that got busted that no one remembers
What are we supposed to do? Demand the FBI release the social media accounts they deleted? The shooter is also dead, so there's no trial and no litigation process of guilt or innocence. As for the second shooter, he was obviously guilty so again, what are we supposed to do? Ask the same questions for the 30th time?
The CK shooting is relevant because there's a murder trial and TPUSA continues to shoot themselves in the foot. It will continue to stay relevant.
Exactly, you didn't get any talking points given to you by your favorite Social Media Personality or Political Pundit, so you consider it a simple over and done with without anything to question. The guy was obviously guilty, the entire story happened as portrayed, and we can just move on.
It is very funny to treat "asking the same questions for the Xth time" as something sarcastic as if the entire Kirk thing hasn't just been "DAE ISRAEL DID IT?" on repeat.
The guy was obviously guilty, the entire story happened as portrayed, and we can just move on.
Do you not understand that regardless of what CIA handler prompted the guy to set up on Trump's golf course, he still set up on Trump's golf course?
How are we supposed to get closer to figuring out who the handler was?
It is very funny to treat "asking the same questions for the Xth time" as something sarcastic as if the entire Kirk thing hasn't just been "DAE ISRAEL DID IT?" on repeat.
Completely wrong. The CK coverage continues to yield new details.
Google search trends showing that key players in the story were searched from Israel and DC prior to the shooting (and nowhere else)
30.06 tests continue to prove the bullet would overpenetrate in almost all (if not all) cases
Tyler Robinson photo from Dairy Queen with inconsistent wardrobe compared to the FBI's ridiculous "he changed clothes twice" story
Egyptian planes following Erika Kirk
Erika apparently just lied to Glenn Beck that Charlie never texted anyone that he was in fear for his life shortly before he died. Frank Turek confirmed twice that Charlie texted he was afraid for his life a few days before the shooting.
Just because some waterheads are imagining elves with palm guns under trapdoors doesn't mean people aren't making progress.
The world feels precarious and on a razor's edge if one person could do this. Almost anybody could be killed at almost any time.
This idea is simply cope from people who believe the FBI. I and many others would massively prefer that a random tranny did this so we can go gloves off on them, instead of the Israeli mob. The first is a significantly more tractable problem than the second.
Unfortunately, despite the powers that be insisting that an gay antifa furry did this, there has been zero action against gay antifa furries. In fact, they won't even go after the tranny boyfriend who almost certainly was involved. It's almost as if that was just a fig leaf covering the actual perpetrators.
You say you'd massively prefer a lone gay furry-lover, which is far far more likely and supported by evidence, but you still go with the "mob" of elite assassins that you can't even identify much less lay out a detailed theory of.
That's the definition of cope.
But I don't even blame you guys for wanting to believe these far-out theories, because the actual truth that there's 150 million insane liberals most of whom would murder you if they knew your beliefs and knew they could get away with it is terrifying.
You can see this fear in Crowder's Change My Mind he did afterwards; even behind bulletproof glass with a real security team he was visibly (and justifiably) shaking in fear. And everyone right of center feels this to some extent because Kirk was an everyman that nobody thought was under the gun.
It was some Mossad midget that popped up out of the trap door and shot him and that's why they confiscated the SD card to hide the evidence -- this is the easy answer because it lets you pretend that you're not surrounded every day by people who would do the same thing to you.
You say you'd massively prefer a lone gay furry-lover, which is far far more likely and supported by evidence, but you still go with the "mob" of elite assassins that you can't even identify much less lay out a detailed theory of.
Do you think 9/11 was simply the result of Saudi hijackers flying planes into the WTC? If not, do you have a detailed theory you can lay out as to what really happened?
Do you think JFK was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone? If not, can you lay out a detailed theory?
It was some Mossad midget that popped up out of the trap door and shot him and that's why they confiscated the SD card to hide the evidence -- this is the easy answer because it lets you pretend that you're not surrounded every day by people who would do the same thing to you.
Again, we would be dealing with a much easier world if a lone gunman was indeed 100% responsible for Charlie Kirk.
I still think his gay friends helped plan it but yes people do not want to believe that their liberal neighbors could just murder them. Look at all the "this isnt about left or right" cope that's popular now
Tyler Robinson's DNA on the rifle proves next to nothing. It is supposed to be his gun.
The claim that Tyler's parents turned him in has already been disproven. A local LEO stated at a presser that another LEO called Tyler and his family and got him to surrender.
the claim that Tyler's dad recognized the gun from the photo is 100% false. The government has stated that the infamous NYP photo of the sporterized Mauser is NOT the actual gun found, therefore it would be impossible for Tyler's dad to recognize it.
And then Matt tries to lampshade all of this by saying "OK it might be bullshit but why aren't his parents saying anything?" Dude, you know it's bullshit. And you knowingly put it out there.
Now Matt is saying Tyler is the guy in the surveillance images because he was "known for walking around with clenched fists." LOL
"it's not a deep state plot because they would've done a better job." Or maybe because they had to throw it together in a compressed timeframe?
"why would the feds have messed up on the caliber?" have you seen who the FBI employs? Have you read their ridiculous excuses for Ruby Ridge?
cites a bullet theory by Fenix Ammunition, a loudmouth RW plant that is obviously a crypto-Jew and has been activated to scream about this story 48 hours ago
"Erika is grieving and we should let her pick up the pieces of her shattered life." Erika is on a cable news tour at the moment and doing a town hall with Israeli agent Bari Weiss.
In summary, Matt Walsh works for Ben Shapiro, who has been witnessed receiving direction from Mossad.
"Because I work for Ben Shapiro and I dont want to be next."
Not going to watch this, but I assume that he's not talking about the lone-gunman non-conspiracy (not counting the message board with people predicting the day of his murder) theory with holes bigger than a 30-06 exit wound?
He addresses people predicting the day of his murder and the exit would. His stance is things are not clear cut but it is not something like the CIA, FBI or Mossad because they would not let him live or use a different caliber in case of a second shooter, the guy is not screaming he is not guilty and his parents are not defending him.
Was he pushed to do it by a fed? Who knows but the rest seems unlikely.
What a surprise that a parade of influencers lined up to call for the death penalty just now, before the trial has even started.
Still, why would they allow him to live rather then get the same treatment as Trump's assassin, that was a lot more fishy then what happen to Charlie Kirk and yet people are focused more on Charlie's assassin. Why?
Honestly, I don't know. It might have something to do with the rest of his network completely avoiding charges. Like either they'd have to kill 8 people in a short span of time or arrest him alive.
Also Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested, then killed later. Epstein was arrested multiple times, then finally killed. James Earl Ray was never killed. And we know two of those were patsies.
Not saying he was not pushed but does not seem like a second shooter existed or that the guy was being framed and we have no info on being pushed. I'm also concerned that we know that Trump's assassin was pushed to do it online, there is a username to track and yet why is everyone focused on Charlie's assassin and not Trump's?
Idk about a second shooter, but his boyfriend and other trannies definitely knew about it, judging from their "Charlie Kirk Dead at 31 on 9/10" posts a week before the murder.
Well, Trump is still alive and he's not trying to solve his assassination attempt (because he knows who did it and he doesn't want to solve it). Can't really help a guy who doesn't help himself.
With Butler, it's easy to understand that whatshisface climbed on the roof and took the shot. Very hard to understand why nobody stopped him, but what else can we do at this point but speculate about it, without interviewing the Secret Service agents ourselves? Perhaps Tucker will find some online footprint the feds didn't scrub.
Charlie, on the other hand, was fighting for truth and got murdered for it. Also a more recent assassination with even more obvious inconsistencies. Most people are choosing to fight for Charlie.
For example, the FBI says Robinson smuggled a Mauser 98 onto the roof in his pants and backpack. It is physically impossible (even when broken down) to conceal that gun in the pants and backpack in the photos.
Kind of missing my point, but whatever.
The "official narrative" is far less credible than any of the "conspiracy theories" that people are accused of having.
Even using the term "Conspiracy Theories" is acknowledging and validating the fed slop framing.
It's so obvious that he was set up to die as the Marriage Martyr™. The ideology was incredibly unpopular and needed an emotional thing to rally behind.
Downvotes won't change the truth.
The least suspicious account is back.
https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/1ARK52D4le/is-there-any-problem-you-dont-bl/c
The world feels precarious and on a razor's edge if one person could do this. Almost anybody could be killed at almost any time.
Well that's how it is, and it's cowardly to pretend otherwise. One crazy liberal could sneak a long gun onto a roof in public past a security team. Easily.
The bullet is weird and should be explained, and could just be a one in a million thing, but everything else is not even a stretch. Crazy liberal wants to kill somebody because they're saying 'mean words'? Uh, yeah, where have you been the last ten years.
Why is there so much belated inorganic ballistics sperging over Kirk's shooting months later?
Why isn't there more focus on Trump’s shooter when the stakes were much higher, the shooter so much more dysgenic, the Secret Service security perimeter failure so much more egregious, etc?
Because Candace Owens leaked texts that made it possible to suspect Israel was involved over a month later, and TPUSA seemingly confirmed their validity, so the guys who scream that Israel is behind every stubbed toe were able to swarm into the topic and make every single aspect be a question.
And because most people get all their thinking and opinions done for them through talking heads like Owens or Walsh, its now a constant topic of discussion because its now part of that grift for these types to clickbait you into their sphere.
Trump's one got buried hard, just like the second shooter that came shortly after that got busted that no one remembers, so the masses didn't get any of the questionable aspects of that downloaded from their favorite Tweeter to talk about.
What are we supposed to do? Demand the FBI release the social media accounts they deleted? The shooter is also dead, so there's no trial and no litigation process of guilt or innocence. As for the second shooter, he was obviously guilty so again, what are we supposed to do? Ask the same questions for the 30th time?
The CK shooting is relevant because there's a murder trial and TPUSA continues to shoot themselves in the foot. It will continue to stay relevant.
Exactly, you didn't get any talking points given to you by your favorite Social Media Personality or Political Pundit, so you consider it a simple over and done with without anything to question. The guy was obviously guilty, the entire story happened as portrayed, and we can just move on.
It is very funny to treat "asking the same questions for the Xth time" as something sarcastic as if the entire Kirk thing hasn't just been "DAE ISRAEL DID IT?" on repeat.
Do you not understand that regardless of what CIA handler prompted the guy to set up on Trump's golf course, he still set up on Trump's golf course?
How are we supposed to get closer to figuring out who the handler was?
Completely wrong. The CK coverage continues to yield new details.
Just because some waterheads are imagining elves with palm guns under trapdoors doesn't mean people aren't making progress.
What sort of ballistics tests would you have liked to see around Trump's shooter? How is this a relevant comparison to the current situation at all?
Because Charlie kirk was the future abs trump is an old boomer about to age out anyway.
This idea is simply cope from people who believe the FBI. I and many others would massively prefer that a random tranny did this so we can go gloves off on them, instead of the Israeli mob. The first is a significantly more tractable problem than the second.
Unfortunately, despite the powers that be insisting that an gay antifa furry did this, there has been zero action against gay antifa furries. In fact, they won't even go after the tranny boyfriend who almost certainly was involved. It's almost as if that was just a fig leaf covering the actual perpetrators.
You say you'd massively prefer a lone gay furry-lover, which is far far more likely and supported by evidence, but you still go with the "mob" of elite assassins that you can't even identify much less lay out a detailed theory of.
That's the definition of cope.
But I don't even blame you guys for wanting to believe these far-out theories, because the actual truth that there's 150 million insane liberals most of whom would murder you if they knew your beliefs and knew they could get away with it is terrifying.
You can see this fear in Crowder's Change My Mind he did afterwards; even behind bulletproof glass with a real security team he was visibly (and justifiably) shaking in fear. And everyone right of center feels this to some extent because Kirk was an everyman that nobody thought was under the gun.
It was some Mossad midget that popped up out of the trap door and shot him and that's why they confiscated the SD card to hide the evidence -- this is the easy answer because it lets you pretend that you're not surrounded every day by people who would do the same thing to you.
Do you think 9/11 was simply the result of Saudi hijackers flying planes into the WTC? If not, do you have a detailed theory you can lay out as to what really happened?
Do you think JFK was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone? If not, can you lay out a detailed theory?
Again, we would be dealing with a much easier world if a lone gunman was indeed 100% responsible for Charlie Kirk.
Yeah I've seen a 50 cal pass clean through a deer. Just dropped dead. No explosions involved
I still think his gay friends helped plan it but yes people do not want to believe that their liberal neighbors could just murder them. Look at all the "this isnt about left or right" cope that's popular now
I don't buy into anything that comes out of ZIO-FAGGOT Matt's Walsh's bitch mouth
Jotting down some notes as I listen to this:
And then Matt tries to lampshade all of this by saying "OK it might be bullshit but why aren't his parents saying anything?" Dude, you know it's bullshit. And you knowingly put it out there.
Now Matt is saying Tyler is the guy in the surveillance images because he was "known for walking around with clenched fists." LOL
In summary, Matt Walsh works for Ben Shapiro, who has been witnessed receiving direction from Mossad.
Stop posting Matt Walsh videos
The guy is a FAGGOT FRAUD!!!! PROOF: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0NPvObTJUg
No one makes a documentary about Transsexualism without mentioning its jewish origins unless he's a FRAUD!!!!!
Transsexualism is Jewish Kabbalah. Proof From Rabbi. Links Inside https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16bP7gtt2K/transsexualism-is-jewish-kabbala/c
"Because I'm paid by the natalists and I don't want to be next."