Why is there so much belated inorganic ballistics sperging over Kirk's shooting months later?
Why isn't there more focus on Trump’s shooter when the stakes were much higher, the shooter so much more dysgenic, the Secret Service security perimeter failure so much more egregious, etc?
Because Candace Owens leaked texts that made it possible to suspect Israel was involved over a month later, and TPUSA seemingly confirmed their validity, so the guys who scream that Israel is behind every stubbed toe were able to swarm into the topic and make every single aspect be a question.
And because most people get all their thinking and opinions done for them through talking heads like Owens or Walsh, its now a constant topic of discussion because its now part of that grift for these types to clickbait you into their sphere.
Trump's one got buried hard, just like the second shooter that came shortly after that got busted that no one remembers, so the masses didn't get any of the questionable aspects of that downloaded from their favorite Tweeter to talk about.
Trump's one got buried hard, just like the second shooter that came shortly after that got busted that no one remembers
What are we supposed to do? Demand the FBI release the social media accounts they deleted? The shooter is also dead, so there's no trial and no litigation process of guilt or innocence. As for the second shooter, he was obviously guilty so again, what are we supposed to do? Ask the same questions for the 30th time?
The CK shooting is relevant because there's a murder trial and TPUSA continues to shoot themselves in the foot. It will continue to stay relevant.
Exactly, you didn't get any talking points given to you by your favorite Social Media Personality or Political Pundit, so you consider it a simple over and done with without anything to question. The guy was obviously guilty, the entire story happened as portrayed, and we can just move on.
It is very funny to treat "asking the same questions for the Xth time" as something sarcastic as if the entire Kirk thing hasn't just been "DAE ISRAEL DID IT?" on repeat.
The guy was obviously guilty, the entire story happened as portrayed, and we can just move on.
Do you not understand that regardless of what CIA handler prompted the guy to set up on Trump's golf course, he still set up on Trump's golf course?
How are we supposed to get closer to figuring out who the handler was?
It is very funny to treat "asking the same questions for the Xth time" as something sarcastic as if the entire Kirk thing hasn't just been "DAE ISRAEL DID IT?" on repeat.
Completely wrong. The CK coverage continues to yield new details.
Google search trends showing that key players in the story were searched from Israel and DC prior to the shooting (and nowhere else)
30.06 tests continue to prove the bullet would overpenetrate in almost all (if not all) cases
Tyler Robinson photo from Dairy Queen with inconsistent wardrobe compared to the FBI's ridiculous "he changed clothes twice" story
Egyptian planes following Erika Kirk
Erika apparently just lied to Glenn Beck that Charlie never texted anyone that he was in fear for his life shortly before he died. Frank Turek confirmed twice that Charlie texted he was afraid for his life a few days before the shooting.
Just because some waterheads are imagining elves with palm guns under trapdoors doesn't mean people aren't making progress.
Why is there so much belated inorganic ballistics sperging over Kirk's shooting months later?
Why isn't there more focus on Trump’s shooter when the stakes were much higher, the shooter so much more dysgenic, the Secret Service security perimeter failure so much more egregious, etc?
Because Candace Owens leaked texts that made it possible to suspect Israel was involved over a month later, and TPUSA seemingly confirmed their validity, so the guys who scream that Israel is behind every stubbed toe were able to swarm into the topic and make every single aspect be a question.
And because most people get all their thinking and opinions done for them through talking heads like Owens or Walsh, its now a constant topic of discussion because its now part of that grift for these types to clickbait you into their sphere.
Trump's one got buried hard, just like the second shooter that came shortly after that got busted that no one remembers, so the masses didn't get any of the questionable aspects of that downloaded from their favorite Tweeter to talk about.
What are we supposed to do? Demand the FBI release the social media accounts they deleted? The shooter is also dead, so there's no trial and no litigation process of guilt or innocence. As for the second shooter, he was obviously guilty so again, what are we supposed to do? Ask the same questions for the 30th time?
The CK shooting is relevant because there's a murder trial and TPUSA continues to shoot themselves in the foot. It will continue to stay relevant.
Exactly, you didn't get any talking points given to you by your favorite Social Media Personality or Political Pundit, so you consider it a simple over and done with without anything to question. The guy was obviously guilty, the entire story happened as portrayed, and we can just move on.
It is very funny to treat "asking the same questions for the Xth time" as something sarcastic as if the entire Kirk thing hasn't just been "DAE ISRAEL DID IT?" on repeat.
Do you not understand that regardless of what CIA handler prompted the guy to set up on Trump's golf course, he still set up on Trump's golf course?
How are we supposed to get closer to figuring out who the handler was?
Completely wrong. The CK coverage continues to yield new details.
Just because some waterheads are imagining elves with palm guns under trapdoors doesn't mean people aren't making progress.
What sort of ballistics tests would you have liked to see around Trump's shooter? How is this a relevant comparison to the current situation at all?
Because Charlie kirk was the future abs trump is an old boomer about to age out anyway.