The world feels precarious and on a razor's edge if one person could do this. Almost anybody could be killed at almost any time.
Well that's how it is, and it's cowardly to pretend otherwise. One crazy liberal could sneak a long gun onto a roof in public past a security team. Easily.
The bullet is weird and should be explained, and could just be a one in a million thing, but everything else is not even a stretch. Crazy liberal wants to kill somebody because they're saying 'mean words'? Uh, yeah, where have you been the last ten years.
Why is there so much belated inorganic ballistics sperging over Kirk's shooting months later?
Why isn't there more focus on Trump’s shooter when the stakes were much higher, the shooter so much more dysgenic, the Secret Service security perimeter failure so much more egregious, etc?
Because Candace Owens leaked texts that made it possible to suspect Israel was involved over a month later, and TPUSA seemingly confirmed their validity, so the guys who scream that Israel is behind every stubbed toe were able to swarm into the topic and make every single aspect be a question.
And because most people get all their thinking and opinions done for them through talking heads like Owens or Walsh, its now a constant topic of discussion because its now part of that grift for these types to clickbait you into their sphere.
Trump's one got buried hard, just like the second shooter that came shortly after that got busted that no one remembers, so the masses didn't get any of the questionable aspects of that downloaded from their favorite Tweeter to talk about.
Trump's one got buried hard, just like the second shooter that came shortly after that got busted that no one remembers
What are we supposed to do? Demand the FBI release the social media accounts they deleted? The shooter is also dead, so there's no trial and no litigation process of guilt or innocence. As for the second shooter, he was obviously guilty so again, what are we supposed to do? Ask the same questions for the 30th time?
The CK shooting is relevant because there's a murder trial and TPUSA continues to shoot themselves in the foot. It will continue to stay relevant.
Exactly, you didn't get any talking points given to you by your favorite Social Media Personality or Political Pundit, so you consider it a simple over and done with without anything to question. The guy was obviously guilty, the entire story happened as portrayed, and we can just move on.
It is very funny to treat "asking the same questions for the Xth time" as something sarcastic as if the entire Kirk thing hasn't just been "DAE ISRAEL DID IT?" on repeat.
The world feels precarious and on a razor's edge if one person could do this. Almost anybody could be killed at almost any time.
This idea is simply cope from people who believe the FBI. I and many others would massively prefer that a random tranny did this so we can go gloves off on them, instead of the Israeli mob. The first is a significantly more tractable problem than the second.
Unfortunately, despite the powers that be insisting that an gay antifa furry did this, there has been zero action against gay antifa furries. In fact, they won't even go after the tranny boyfriend who almost certainly was involved. It's almost as if that was just a fig leaf covering the actual perpetrators.
You say you'd massively prefer a lone gay furry-lover, which is far far more likely and supported by evidence, but you still go with the "mob" of elite assassins that you can't even identify much less lay out a detailed theory of.
That's the definition of cope.
But I don't even blame you guys for wanting to believe these far-out theories, because the actual truth that there's 150 million insane liberals most of whom would murder you if they knew your beliefs and knew they could get away with it is terrifying.
You can see this fear in Crowder's Change My Mind he did afterwards; even behind bulletproof glass with a real security team he was visibly (and justifiably) shaking in fear. And everyone right of center feels this to some extent because Kirk was an everyman that nobody thought was under the gun.
It was some Mossad midget that popped up out of the trap door and shot him and that's why they confiscated the SD card to hide the evidence -- this is the easy answer because it lets you pretend that you're not surrounded every day by people who would do the same thing to you.
You say you'd massively prefer a lone gay furry-lover, which is far far more likely and supported by evidence, but you still go with the "mob" of elite assassins that you can't even identify much less lay out a detailed theory of.
Do you think 9/11 was simply the result of Saudi hijackers flying planes into the WTC? If not, do you have a detailed theory you can lay out as to what really happened?
Do you think JFK was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone? If not, can you lay out a detailed theory?
It was some Mossad midget that popped up out of the trap door and shot him and that's why they confiscated the SD card to hide the evidence -- this is the easy answer because it lets you pretend that you're not surrounded every day by people who would do the same thing to you.
Again, we would be dealing with a much easier world if a lone gunman was indeed 100% responsible for Charlie Kirk.
I still think his gay friends helped plan it but yes people do not want to believe that their liberal neighbors could just murder them. Look at all the "this isnt about left or right" cope that's popular now
The world feels precarious and on a razor's edge if one person could do this. Almost anybody could be killed at almost any time.
Well that's how it is, and it's cowardly to pretend otherwise. One crazy liberal could sneak a long gun onto a roof in public past a security team. Easily.
The bullet is weird and should be explained, and could just be a one in a million thing, but everything else is not even a stretch. Crazy liberal wants to kill somebody because they're saying 'mean words'? Uh, yeah, where have you been the last ten years.
Why is there so much belated inorganic ballistics sperging over Kirk's shooting months later?
Why isn't there more focus on Trump’s shooter when the stakes were much higher, the shooter so much more dysgenic, the Secret Service security perimeter failure so much more egregious, etc?
Because Candace Owens leaked texts that made it possible to suspect Israel was involved over a month later, and TPUSA seemingly confirmed their validity, so the guys who scream that Israel is behind every stubbed toe were able to swarm into the topic and make every single aspect be a question.
And because most people get all their thinking and opinions done for them through talking heads like Owens or Walsh, its now a constant topic of discussion because its now part of that grift for these types to clickbait you into their sphere.
Trump's one got buried hard, just like the second shooter that came shortly after that got busted that no one remembers, so the masses didn't get any of the questionable aspects of that downloaded from their favorite Tweeter to talk about.
What are we supposed to do? Demand the FBI release the social media accounts they deleted? The shooter is also dead, so there's no trial and no litigation process of guilt or innocence. As for the second shooter, he was obviously guilty so again, what are we supposed to do? Ask the same questions for the 30th time?
The CK shooting is relevant because there's a murder trial and TPUSA continues to shoot themselves in the foot. It will continue to stay relevant.
Exactly, you didn't get any talking points given to you by your favorite Social Media Personality or Political Pundit, so you consider it a simple over and done with without anything to question. The guy was obviously guilty, the entire story happened as portrayed, and we can just move on.
It is very funny to treat "asking the same questions for the Xth time" as something sarcastic as if the entire Kirk thing hasn't just been "DAE ISRAEL DID IT?" on repeat.
What sort of ballistics tests would you have liked to see around Trump's shooter? How is this a relevant comparison to the current situation at all?
Because Charlie kirk was the future abs trump is an old boomer about to age out anyway.
This idea is simply cope from people who believe the FBI. I and many others would massively prefer that a random tranny did this so we can go gloves off on them, instead of the Israeli mob. The first is a significantly more tractable problem than the second.
Unfortunately, despite the powers that be insisting that an gay antifa furry did this, there has been zero action against gay antifa furries. In fact, they won't even go after the tranny boyfriend who almost certainly was involved. It's almost as if that was just a fig leaf covering the actual perpetrators.
You say you'd massively prefer a lone gay furry-lover, which is far far more likely and supported by evidence, but you still go with the "mob" of elite assassins that you can't even identify much less lay out a detailed theory of.
That's the definition of cope.
But I don't even blame you guys for wanting to believe these far-out theories, because the actual truth that there's 150 million insane liberals most of whom would murder you if they knew your beliefs and knew they could get away with it is terrifying.
You can see this fear in Crowder's Change My Mind he did afterwards; even behind bulletproof glass with a real security team he was visibly (and justifiably) shaking in fear. And everyone right of center feels this to some extent because Kirk was an everyman that nobody thought was under the gun.
It was some Mossad midget that popped up out of the trap door and shot him and that's why they confiscated the SD card to hide the evidence -- this is the easy answer because it lets you pretend that you're not surrounded every day by people who would do the same thing to you.
Do you think 9/11 was simply the result of Saudi hijackers flying planes into the WTC? If not, do you have a detailed theory you can lay out as to what really happened?
Do you think JFK was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone? If not, can you lay out a detailed theory?
Again, we would be dealing with a much easier world if a lone gunman was indeed 100% responsible for Charlie Kirk.
Yeah I've seen a 50 cal pass clean through a deer. Just dropped dead. No explosions involved
I still think his gay friends helped plan it but yes people do not want to believe that their liberal neighbors could just murder them. Look at all the "this isnt about left or right" cope that's popular now