I'll probably be watching Rekieta, or possibly Crowder. Watched FOX last year with family and caught Crowder at the end, but I really don't feel like getting the mainstream narrative again.
Bush not appointing Thomas, Scalia, or Alito as Chief Justice when Roberts was nominated was a travesty, but I don't think he had any incentive to appoint anything other than an establishment cuck to the position.
"People who bleed"
Makes Arnold's line after the first time they fight off the Predator sound like a policy statement for an anti-feminist hit-squad.
Dank's gonna get banned for impersonating a public figure on a verified account, but the laughs might be worth it.
E: Yup, he caught a suspension for it until he changes his name/bio.
It's an engine update as well (UE5). No idea if they're altering mechanics or story, but I'd imagine with the comments they gave it's one or both.
Neither of those people look like they know how to fight.
I'd say technically Wheel of Time since Rings of Power wasn't a direct adaptation of the source material, and thus can excuse some stuff with "Tolkien didn't explicitly say this didn't happen, so we can say it did!", but having not read WoT I couldn't give a proper assessment, just a gut feeling.
A very bold statement on a yellow background, at that.
You're probably right. I'm not sure Kyle is independently interesting/entertaining enough to support an "influencer" career. While he's been entertaining in interviews, his only solo content is cringe stuff he does with his GF on TikTok.
Apparently Kyle is also starting his own YouTube channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCob_jm6ikyHVKRkgcB7Irrg
letthemfight.gif
Pedophilia and transgenderism are widely accepted among Islamic societies.
So all Rackets has to do to get a crowder appearance finally is a YouTube permaban?
He very well might. He indicated a willingness to sue Law and Crime when he got a BS copyright claim and likely has hard data to show damages. I think the only determinant at this point is whether he gets his channel back prior to initiating any sort of suit, and who he's going to sue.
He already read all 45 complaints he received before getting that email (44 of them were substantially the same.) He was going to post the complaints in a bit, but I think his plans for the rest of the day might have just gone a bit sideways, because he got permabanned from YouTube shortly before his daytime stream ended a little while ago.
So one of these people realized how stupid what they did was after they found out Nick was going to post the unredacted complaints to his locals and sent Nick an email begging him not to do that.
https://rekietalaw.locals.com/post/2839932/so-i-got-an-email
It's not my place to discuss why he was terminated
Was it the gay orgies?
The last Top Gun literally had a souped-up trench run. You could totally do a cool movie/show focused on a fighter squadron and have it make a billion dollars, but not produced by any of the current Disney/Bad Reboot crop.
Free speech does not however, extend to Kiwi Farms and its satellites, which are forums for exchanging child pornography, defamation and cyberstalking individuals, including children, to death.
Is he really blaming Kiwi Farms/Null for the actions of unaffiliated websites? No idea who this guy is but he's clearly a retard.
Kiwi Farms is a stalking and terrorism forum run by an avowed paedophile that does and permits things that are illegal even in 1st Amendment jurisdictions
And here he's defaming Null, unless I'm misinformed.
The previous version was actually kinda funny, if an inaccurate strawman. I think that makes this an even better example than usual, because a humorous version of the comic exists, but due to offense taken by leftists, it had to be changed to something with no humor or sense.
I didn't think the first one contradicted the established lore too much (though I'm not a superfan, so I'm sure I missed some stuff), outside the setup for the game, and it was pretty explicitly an alternate timeline from what I recall. The second game contradicted established lore pretty heavily though.
Nah, that's an interracial couple not containing a white male. Can't possibly be the bad guys.
Good.
They should ban the little girls too. The YMCA is a men's organization after all.
That's far more reductive than what I wrote.
That's because it was supposed to be. I have a (bad) habit of using reductive arguments that I learned in my teen years and it served me well in scoring points against idiots through college. You are correct that simply copying the strategy of your opponent will likely fail, but I thought that was such an obvious point as to be worthless, at least without providing an alternative.
I didn't feel the need to expand on this because it wasn't relevant. [...] My primary point behind this was to make sure that people understand that political violence is not something anyone on the right can actually take advantage of.
And my primary point is that telling someone who is considering it not to engage in political violence and failing to suggest an alternative course of action is worse than doing nothing. As you mention there are lots of people (though not enough, IMO) doing what needs to be done if it is going to be possible for us to win back the West through non-violent means, but if someone is considering violence in order to achieve anti-leftist political and social goals, they either haven't considered the peaceful alternatives, or they have rejected them and need to be shown that there is at least a possibility that non-violent means can succeed.
To be clear, I don't think you're wrong, just that you argument you present is ineffective at achieving the goal you appear to have (that being dissuading those who are against the left from engaging in political violence.)
Haven't you heard? It takes time to count ballots. You won't know the election results for days, possibly weeks.