Jesus, of all the people who have done good by bringing leftist and government fraud and corruption to light… talk about a purity spiral.
She’s an autist and deaf. No shit a deaf person is interested in and an expert in ASL and interpretation.
Because she’s deaf and has worked on ASL/interpretation she’s a “a liberal DEI hire”? Is this some female queen bee stuff where women try to drag down other famous or successful women?
“Nooo we need the person saying they’re going to dox all the patriot front members for being white nationalists and pushing DEI initiatives in every company she worked for! She pushes AI generated data that is never used by the Trump admin!”
Meanwhile here’s her taking a watch from a pseudo American company selling Chinese made watches while shilling Zionism.
You’re letting leftists control the framework. Who fucking cares if they’re “controlled opposition”, they’re being paraded as boogeyman simply for being white nationalists and the immediate “conservative” reaction is to deny, denounce, and disassociate.
Quit being afraid of being called racist. Quit allowing “disaffected liberals” like this cunt to control the Overton Window. The right needs radicals to shift the window to deportations and remigration being the moderate/lefty option. Modern Buckleys are going to kill all the momentum built and they’re not doing it for “morality”.
I'm specifically rejecting the people who are being paid to let them control the framework.
By agreeing with the people controlling the framework? Fascinating.
I'm not, nobody here is.
But I'm not going to put on khaki shorts and RayBans and parade around to give the douchebag media a show, either.
Which is why the optics will never change.
Actors aren't radicals. They're prostitutes.
Again, you’re letting leftists control the framework. Let’s say they’re all fake gay feds, why is the “right” demanding them to be doxxed for white supremacist views?
You keep falling for the cyclical trap of “everything is fake and gay, therefore I will never support anything even if it aligns with my views”
That's why you people are supporting the paid actors? Muh optics? Luh fucking mao.
Dude, fuck "optics". Go burn down a mosque if you want radicals. I respect the rioters in England far more than I do anyone here, because they're actually out there trying to hurt the bad people.
Let’s say they’re all fake gay feds,
We don't have to say it, they are. Odds are they're all from the same gay bar in Plano, as it turns out.
demanding them to be doxxed
I'm doing no such thing, I'm simply saying that people who are literally in the pay of the ADL should not be trusted.
Why do you want to trust and support guys who are literally getting paid by an arm of the Mossad?
therefore I will never support anything even if it aligns with my views
You're being stupid.
Find and gather the like minded. Buy arms, ammunition, and nonperishable food. Train, get in shape and learn to use weapons. If you can't fight, you aren't a man.
Stop thinking that giving upvotes on social media matters. Your "support" of an ADL backed posse of paid actors means worse than nothing.
What "they" want, is for idiots to get caught up arguing online about paid actors, instead of doing anything in real life, in your own community.
Again you’re falling for the framework, communists don’t care if AOC is a paid shill who will say anything for popularity and money, she shifts the Overton window their way. If it came out tomorrow that she was a GOP psyop they wouldn’t give a flying fuck, they’d simply keep using her if she’s useful or dispose her if she isn’t.
We don't have to say it, they are. Odds are they're all from the same gay bar in Plano, as it turns out.
Again, and?
I'm doing no such thing, I'm simply saying that people who are literally in the pay of the ADL should not be trusted.
Why do you want to trust and support guys who are literally getting paid by an arm of the Mossad?
Because the other arm of the mossad are the ones attacking them, again you’re letting them set the framework to keep the GOP gay race globalists.
What "they" want, is for idiots to get caught up arguing online about paid actors, instead of doing anything in real life, in your own community.
Yes, patriot front appears every few months to… dominate discourse online by everyone calling them feds or white nationalists and demanding their doxxing.
the immediate “conservative” reaction is to deny, denounce, and disassociate.
And that is the core of the problem. No one can act without getting attacked from the from the left by the supposed right. Just like how Farage attacks Lowe.
If she was hawking the grift it would be a different story.
She’s doing a or piece on local news specifically to help the watch company grift. Unless, of course, she’s completely incapable of looking into very public information.
Literally have never heard of her or any of her work. Care to share?
Not my job to educate you, but she has a github and a webpage. She's done a shitton of chasing down of shadowy USAID-style money laundering where government funds are going to NGOs, bouncing around, and ending up in politicians pockets (etc).
You're intentionally leaving out the DEI promotions.
That's going to need some backing up. All we have are 3 out of context screenshots, two directly dealing with her personal disability, and one generic "customer diversity" statement. Meanwhile, she has mountains of tweets and analysis she's written, and that's the best anyone can come up with to slander her?
we need the person saying they’re going to dox all the patriot front members
Within the last ~2 days there have been more than a few posts on here calling patriot front glowies, shills, funded by SPLC, etc.
She's done a shitton of chasing down of shadowy USAID-style money laundering where government funds are going to NGOs, bouncing around, and ending up in politicians pockets (etc).
So nothing of value then. Considering nothing ever happens to these shadowy corrupt figures anyway.
Within the last ~2 days there have been more than a few posts on here calling patriot front glowies, shills, funded by SPLC, etc.
I'm new here, I come from voat (upgoat) however I do believe anyone able to avoid censorship is controlled opposition and that a high degree of skepticism is healthy when dealing with online communities.
Karlyn Borysenko is a walking personality disorder and can be freely ignored. Also she’s a fat ugly cow, and it’s amusing to see her profile picture on that post because she’s clearly attempted some sort of glow up.
Can you explain the (non-religious) moral stance (if any) that would cause you to oppose foreign subversion, cultural degeneracy, or even child sacrifice?
Not an atheist, I believe in a creator. However White birth rates are at extinction levels in every single christian nation. Christianity is also a predominantly nigger religion now. Sub saharan Africa overtook Europe.
Is it fair then to say your highest principle is White propagation?
I can't say I agree with your second point because, while they're all built on Christian principles, the birth rate drop coincides with Whites abandoning the churches (which, I think, is the cause of the churches degrading morally).
Also, niggers wearing crosses does not make them Christians. Have you ever known a nigger to put himself in harms way to protect someone else?
the birth rate drop coincides with Whites abandoning the churches (which, I think, is the cause of the churches degrading morally).
Christianity is at its peak right now, there have never been as many Christians as there are today. Also as far as im aware, Jesus never told anyone to go to church, he referred to the temple and the mind as the temple.
Repiblicans are Zionist Jews, Democrats are Globalist Jews.
One wants to create a Jewish state that is above international law, through which all their crimes can be laundered, while the other wants to create a de-centralised network of Jews embedded in every government, making their crimes legal in all countries.
Same motives, different tactics (although they're not at all above collaborating when it suits them).
I'm convinced that Donald Trump's president arc was the shadow on the cave wall of an internal dispute between the two on how to best proceed. Globalists push "one race, the human race" wokeness, while the Zionists want to physically dominate the ME and Trump offered to be their guy.
Republicans push jewish foreign policy, democrats push jewish domestic policy. There is no political representation for white Americans. The best we can ever hope for is temporary proxy representation whenever the interests of one side (or the other) temporarily align with our own.
Well, they fit right in with the old republicans, just a bunch of leftist jew puppets who sort of claim to be right wing on occasion when it can con a few idiots into supporting them before they prove what they really are over and over again. It’s pathetic that any Republican voters fall for this bullshit anymore, but they always do.
Data Republican is absolutely correct, only a company that is run by the braindead would not seek out diversity among their customers base.
If you only focus on a narrow customer base you will never grow your company, you will stagnate and die as your competitors delivering the same product seek out as wide and diverse a customer base as they san find.
This has zero to do with DEI and Borysenko is a total fraud.
Yes. Not every game needs to be open world tower-climbing slop with a crafting mechanic bolted on. They should make a wide breadth of smaller-budget games in different genres to appeal to a wider audience rather than investing every cent into Call of Madden.
Xbox literally just tried this with game pass, hundreds of indies and low/ medium budgets of every genre, almost entirely made for redditors, women, and troons, they didn’t sell and now Xbox is firing 3200 people to outsource to India.
Call of madden sells because that has always been the dominant market. Even then call of madden has been beat with the DEI stick to reach “every potential customer” and is now losing sales.
As it turns out diversifying in either sense doesn’t work because making the main demographic 60% of the attention to pander to other demographics causes the main demographic to find other games. Just like millions of smaller budget games don’t work simply because no one plays them unless you’re reaching the only demographic (straight men) who have the numbers to make your game successful.
In no universe is diversifying to reach a broader audience successful long term. Gaming and Hollywood have quite definitively proven this.
almost entirely made for redditors, women, and troons
That was the stupid part. There are plenty of core male gamers who want to play something besides gun and ball. I'm not really saying they shouldn't make the yearly AAA crap. But it's diminishing returns. When you're spending millions to get 5% higher res textures, you might as well be lighting it on fire. The people who lap it up will regardless and you actually can pick up other niches with that money.
they didn’t sell and now Xbox is firing 3200 people to outsource to India.
Doesn't matter if they sold or not. Microsoft is jeeted at the highest levels. They will keep replacing everyone with jeets regardless of performance.
Gaming and Hollywood have quite definitively proven this.
I'm not sure what world you're living in. Or we're using different definitions of "diversifying." Hollywood killed the comedy, they killed the mid-budget action movie, they killed romantic comedies. All they do now is giant-budget capeshit and trying to squeeze the last few dollars out of their IP catalog with sequels or remakes no one asked for. The list of things that have any hope of being greenlit is narrower now than it ever has been and Hollywood is on the ropes.
Did you miss that making a product for different audiences has zero to do with bringing diversity into existing game formats while breaking your leg running to post that straw man question?
Jesus, of all the people who have done good by bringing leftist and government fraud and corruption to light… talk about a purity spiral.
She’s an autist and deaf. No shit a deaf person is interested in and an expert in ASL and interpretation.
Because she’s deaf and has worked on ASL/interpretation she’s a “a liberal DEI hire”? Is this some female queen bee stuff where women try to drag down other famous or successful women?
“Nooo we need the person saying they’re going to dox all the patriot front members for being white nationalists and pushing DEI initiatives in every company she worked for! She pushes AI generated data that is never used by the Trump admin!”
Meanwhile here’s her taking a watch from a pseudo American company selling Chinese made watches while shilling Zionism.
https://youtu.be/SARtoySLC5w
Rumors going around right now that PF are heavily connected to the SPLC and ADL, so.
And?
You’re letting leftists control the framework. Who fucking cares if they’re “controlled opposition”, they’re being paraded as boogeyman simply for being white nationalists and the immediate “conservative” reaction is to deny, denounce, and disassociate.
Quit being afraid of being called racist. Quit allowing “disaffected liberals” like this cunt to control the Overton Window. The right needs radicals to shift the window to deportations and remigration being the moderate/lefty option. Modern Buckleys are going to kill all the momentum built and they’re not doing it for “morality”.
I'm specifically rejecting the people who are being paid to let them control the framework.
I'm not, nobody here is.
But I'm not going to put on khaki shorts and RayBans and parade around to give the douchebag media a show, either.
Actors aren't radicals. They're prostitutes.
By agreeing with the people controlling the framework? Fascinating.
Which is why the optics will never change.
Again, you’re letting leftists control the framework. Let’s say they’re all fake gay feds, why is the “right” demanding them to be doxxed for white supremacist views?
You keep falling for the cyclical trap of “everything is fake and gay, therefore I will never support anything even if it aligns with my views”
By not supporting paid shills.
That's why you people are supporting the paid actors? Muh optics? Luh fucking mao.
Dude, fuck "optics". Go burn down a mosque if you want radicals. I respect the rioters in England far more than I do anyone here, because they're actually out there trying to hurt the bad people.
We don't have to say it, they are. Odds are they're all from the same gay bar in Plano, as it turns out.
I'm doing no such thing, I'm simply saying that people who are literally in the pay of the ADL should not be trusted.
Why do you want to trust and support guys who are literally getting paid by an arm of the Mossad?
You're being stupid.
Find and gather the like minded. Buy arms, ammunition, and nonperishable food. Train, get in shape and learn to use weapons. If you can't fight, you aren't a man.
Stop thinking that giving upvotes on social media matters. Your "support" of an ADL backed posse of paid actors means worse than nothing.
What "they" want, is for idiots to get caught up arguing online about paid actors, instead of doing anything in real life, in your own community.
You're being terminally online, frankly.
Again you’re falling for the framework, communists don’t care if AOC is a paid shill who will say anything for popularity and money, she shifts the Overton window their way. If it came out tomorrow that she was a GOP psyop they wouldn’t give a flying fuck, they’d simply keep using her if she’s useful or dispose her if she isn’t.
Again, and?
Because the other arm of the mossad are the ones attacking them, again you’re letting them set the framework to keep the GOP gay race globalists.
Yes, patriot front appears every few months to… dominate discourse online by everyone calling them feds or white nationalists and demanding their doxxing.
And that is the core of the problem. No one can act without getting attacked from the from the left by the supposed right. Just like how Farage attacks Lowe.
Within the last ~2 days there have been more than a few posts on here calling patriot front glowies, shills, funded by SPLC, etc.
If she was hawking the grift it would be a different story.
She’s doing a or piece on local news specifically to help the watch company grift. Unless, of course, she’s completely incapable of looking into very public information.
Literally have never heard of her or any of her work. Care to share?
You're intentionally leaving out the DEI promotions.
Nope, its more to do with the multiple times "diversity" is mentioned in her tweets and adds containing her.
Not my job to educate you, but she has a github and a webpage. She's done a shitton of chasing down of shadowy USAID-style money laundering where government funds are going to NGOs, bouncing around, and ending up in politicians pockets (etc).
That's going to need some backing up. All we have are 3 out of context screenshots, two directly dealing with her personal disability, and one generic "customer diversity" statement. Meanwhile, she has mountains of tweets and analysis she's written, and that's the best anyone can come up with to slander her?
Within the last ~2 days there have been more than a few posts on here calling patriot front glowies, shills, funded by SPLC, etc.
So nothing of value then. Considering nothing ever happens to these shadowy corrupt figures anyway.
I'm new here, I come from voat (upgoat) however I do believe anyone able to avoid censorship is controlled opposition and that a high degree of skepticism is healthy when dealing with online communities.
Karlyn Borysenko is a walking personality disorder and can be freely ignored. Also she’s a fat ugly cow, and it’s amusing to see her profile picture on that post because she’s clearly attempted some sort of glow up.
Also a jew who drops the right wing grift when it comes to Israel
I had never heard of her, googled her, saw "former psychologist" and "journalist" and decided was too low hanging fruit.
She's lost a lot of weight. Saw her on Owen Shroyer a couple weeks ago. Actually really doesn't look too bad now.
republicans=jews
democrat=jews
its the illusion of choice
You get a choice between the party that overtly wants you dead or covertly wants you dead, good luck white boy.
Now do religion and realize nothing changes.
Atheist?
Can you explain the (non-religious) moral stance (if any) that would cause you to oppose foreign subversion, cultural degeneracy, or even child sacrifice?
It's the same pervert who keeps getting banned, on yet another new account.
First time i've created an account here, I used to be over at voat (upgoat) until they turned it into poal.co
Not an atheist, I believe in a creator. However White birth rates are at extinction levels in every single christian nation. Christianity is also a predominantly nigger religion now. Sub saharan Africa overtook Europe.
Is it fair then to say your highest principle is White propagation?
I can't say I agree with your second point because, while they're all built on Christian principles, the birth rate drop coincides with Whites abandoning the churches (which, I think, is the cause of the churches degrading morally).
Also, niggers wearing crosses does not make them Christians. Have you ever known a nigger to put himself in harms way to protect someone else?
Christianity is at its peak right now, there have never been as many Christians as there are today. Also as far as im aware, Jesus never told anyone to go to church, he referred to the temple and the mind as the temple.
This is retarded. Christianity has never been more compromised. "Christians" have never been less observant.
Gaming is at its peak right now, there have never been as many gamers/games as there are today.
Netflix is at its peak right now, but here have never been as many subscribers as there are today.
Do you see why this claim doesn’t make sense?
Repiblicans are Zionist Jews, Democrats are Globalist Jews.
One wants to create a Jewish state that is above international law, through which all their crimes can be laundered, while the other wants to create a de-centralised network of Jews embedded in every government, making their crimes legal in all countries.
Same motives, different tactics (although they're not at all above collaborating when it suits them).
I'm convinced that Donald Trump's president arc was the shadow on the cave wall of an internal dispute between the two on how to best proceed. Globalists push "one race, the human race" wokeness, while the Zionists want to physically dominate the ME and Trump offered to be their guy.
Republicans push jewish foreign policy, democrats push jewish domestic policy. There is no political representation for white Americans. The best we can ever hope for is temporary proxy representation whenever the interests of one side (or the other) temporarily align with our own.
DSA = the only anti-zionist wing of any party…
looks like a troon
Well, they fit right in with the old republicans, just a bunch of leftist jew puppets who sort of claim to be right wing on occasion when it can con a few idiots into supporting them before they prove what they really are over and over again. It’s pathetic that any Republican voters fall for this bullshit anymore, but they always do.
Data Republican is absolutely correct, only a company that is run by the braindead would not seek out diversity among their customers base. If you only focus on a narrow customer base you will never grow your company, you will stagnate and die as your competitors delivering the same product seek out as wide and diverse a customer base as they san find.
This has zero to do with DEI and Borysenko is a total fraud.
So you agree that video games needed to diversify?
Yes. Not every game needs to be open world tower-climbing slop with a crafting mechanic bolted on. They should make a wide breadth of smaller-budget games in different genres to appeal to a wider audience rather than investing every cent into Call of Madden.
Xbox literally just tried this with game pass, hundreds of indies and low/ medium budgets of every genre, almost entirely made for redditors, women, and troons, they didn’t sell and now Xbox is firing 3200 people to outsource to India.
Call of madden sells because that has always been the dominant market. Even then call of madden has been beat with the DEI stick to reach “every potential customer” and is now losing sales.
As it turns out diversifying in either sense doesn’t work because making the main demographic 60% of the attention to pander to other demographics causes the main demographic to find other games. Just like millions of smaller budget games don’t work simply because no one plays them unless you’re reaching the only demographic (straight men) who have the numbers to make your game successful.
In no universe is diversifying to reach a broader audience successful long term. Gaming and Hollywood have quite definitively proven this.
That was the stupid part. There are plenty of core male gamers who want to play something besides gun and ball. I'm not really saying they shouldn't make the yearly AAA crap. But it's diminishing returns. When you're spending millions to get 5% higher res textures, you might as well be lighting it on fire. The people who lap it up will regardless and you actually can pick up other niches with that money.
Doesn't matter if they sold or not. Microsoft is jeeted at the highest levels. They will keep replacing everyone with jeets regardless of performance.
I'm not sure what world you're living in. Or we're using different definitions of "diversifying." Hollywood killed the comedy, they killed the mid-budget action movie, they killed romantic comedies. All they do now is giant-budget capeshit and trying to squeeze the last few dollars out of their IP catalog with sequels or remakes no one asked for. The list of things that have any hope of being greenlit is narrower now than it ever has been and Hollywood is on the ropes.
Did you miss that making a product for different audiences has zero to do with bringing diversity into existing game formats while breaking your leg running to post that straw man question?
Are you mad it was so easy to destroy your retarded sentiment?
Take her entire statement and switch out AI with gaming.
Do you agree with that statement?
Dude, you are swinging and missing so hard you are screwing yourself into the ground.
Stop while you are behind.
Ah yes, I’m the one arguing that games needed to diversify to appeal to their broad consumer base.
Do they make kid's video games? How about different sports games?
There's like 15 different genres of video games being made with hundreds of subcategories.
Do you know what they call that? A prime example of diversity in product availability.
You have never once been in marketing as you fundamentally do not understand the term "diversity" when it comes to a product line.
You must believe an automaker should only offer one model.
And you’re showing your full retardation.
Which game studio makes a game in every category you just listed, let alone every game category.
The only way AAA games can diversify is by making their one game every 5-10 years “inclusive” to everyone.
She is not calling for every company to fit singular different niches, you fucking moron.
Incoherent and retarded.
If you don'take a product you can't sell one. Best product wins you retard, it's how markets work.