House KIDS Act Deal Drops KOSA Duty of Care, Adds Age Verification for All Users
KIDS Act children online safety bipartisan deal removes KOSA duty of care and adds mandatory age verification — meaning every adult on covered platforms may need to hand government ID to a third-party company. Senate authors declared it dead on arrival, an...
He isn't a RINO. He is a Republican. This is what Republicans DO.
All in service of AIPAC.
"We need to know who exactly is posting all those antisemitic memes, dammit!"
They already know who….there hasn’t been anonymity for a very long time. What they need is the justification for a digital ID so they can link all of your behaviors, comments, tracking info, purchases etc, all to one ID that must be used for getting on the internet, for banking, for driving, etc, so they can fuck you hard with a social credit score that’ll be attributed to your ID. Then they can set score thresholds governing your use of all sorts of things, for example, let’s say a 100 score is perfect and having that score gives you access to anything you want, if they set the score for accessing the internet to 85 and you have an 84, no more internet until you are a good goyim for long enough to raise your score above 85, maybe you need an 80 for accessing goyslop on the TV, or a 90 for driving privileges, shit like that. Commenting anything remotely antisemitic, saying anything that pisses jews off, complaining about their policies near any smart tech, or breaking their rules in the slightest way near any surveillance cams will drop your score, and regaining points will be a long process of swallowing your pride. They’re creating a massive behavior modification system, and it all hinges on that digital ID, it’s gonna be the worst form of enslavement the world has ever seen, and there will be no way to fight back against it unless everyone says fuck this shit and rises up, but to do that, we’d need a shitload of people who don’t care that the Jews are going to remove their access to everything before they start rioting, so the first few people who lose their shit better hope everyone else has the balls to join in, which is unlikely with how afraid everyone will be to lose access to their UBI and everything else.
There are over 9,000 PACS. Many foreign owned and operated. Congress critters can, without ANY scrutiny, take ALL the money and gifts they want from ANY or ALL of 'em in return for policy consideration (lobbying), just so long as it isn't AIPAC. Id'nat right. The hate spills and people notice.
But it always is AIPAC...
AIPAC is the only cover-off Zionist lobby. If you think there aren't jews in control of hundreds more organizations like it that are marginally more stealth about it, you simply haven't thought about that possibly yet
"Catholic Charities" comes to mind. As well as the Ford Foundation. Ol' Henry is rolling in his grave. He warned us at the same time Smedley Butler warned us.
Your use of the descriptor "Zionist" is hateful. Unless you also harbor hate for the Japanese for having a Japanese country; or Belgians for having a Belgian country; you should have no qualms with Israel being a Jewish country. "Palestine" being "free" means nothing but kill Jews. The hate we see online and elsewhere is proof they must have their own country. Only evil people will try to deny them that security. Further you've most certainly never been denied anything in your life because of the efforts of any single "Jew" or "Jewish group." You're no victim. In short, I'm accusing you of childish nonsense as well as being a promoter of hate among like simpletons.
There are no "zionists" under your bed. Blaming an entire race for crooks in government is just hate and nothing more. Do you blame all blacks for Chicago, or did the Jews somehow make black attack black?
Funny thing is that the CEO of the real estate firm that owns O-Block is Jewish
Jews buy real estate.
Virtue signal harder 👍
Discouraging hate is a virtue signal? That's a bizarre position. If people don't call it out when they see it then it grows.
How's the weather in tel aviv?
Nice user name.
I'm glad that people are finally starting to catch on.
This is the sort of thing politicians should be fearful of even proposing. In a just world this man gets torn apart in the street by his own constituents for attempting to perpetrate such evil.
I mean, there's still time left
Cool. Now if you post spicy opinions you can get fired from your job and visited by the cops.
That's the plan.
I really need to go through all the simpsons episodes I have and clip these response vids. And the critic. And mission hill. Duckman. Futurama. Ren & stimpy. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JjL9DGX2sbQ&t=16
That's already been implemented in Europe. There's no way the establishment won't destroy speech here. The idea of police harassing you over memes (they don't agree with) is too much to resist.
Tech illiterate boomers using "think kf the kids" because the boomer vermin dont want to parent themselves
Kids is just a distraction anyway. The real win for the establishment is removing any semblance of anonymous speech online.
Correct.
What? You think the "Save Children From Everything And If You Don't Pass It You're Also Racist Act" is a front for something else?
Are you suggesting boomers are having kids in their 60s?
You’re an idiot.
Are the boomers even parenting anymore?
I mean they will still for this wholeheartedly and say it's the children for sure. They will also parrot things about how they don't mind as they have nothing to hide. I've tried to explain until I'm blue in the face that a loss of privacy online is a direct attack on free speech, but they don't listen. "We can't just let bad people go out there on the dark web and do things" They have no idea what they are talking about.
The youth are so used to constant surveillance, that it's going that way anyway. Simple things like their parents stalking their whereabouts with a phone I would have gone berserk over and probably never left the house to spite it, they don't even question.
They don't leave the house. The world looks normal to you because the changes have come in incrementally. The streets are empty of children because they are all indoors interacting with their electronic devices. The world looks different right outside your door and you don't see. Do you realize how far down the rabbit hole you already are?
Well since your intent is clearly to try to call me out as ignorant, I'll push back. I do see kids outside. Maybe it's from being in a smaller town and not living in an urban ghetto, but kids still go outside. Is there a noticeable difference from the past, sure, as is there a noticeable difference in the amount of independence they have. I see them outside almost every day though.
this is not a rino position, Republicans have been all for internet control and zero anonymity since the bush era.
Step 1: Harvest people’s data to sell.
Step 2: Invest into AI to try to spoof data to make more money.
Issue: AI is too good at producing fake data. Data becomes useless to sell.
Resolution: Force people to sign in with ID to confirm data is human.
Fake ID’s won’t save this. Using a fake ID will still prove the data is real. This is also why the UK really isn’t enforcing against the fake IDs. The AI will have to produce a fake ID signature in order to increase its data value but AI is being subsidized by the governments (So us.) In a round about way, we are literally paying to have our data stolen and sold.
Parents can add programs to their own property that limits access to their kids. Funny how you don't promote this instead. Now, tell US why you really want to add online id verification.
Anything and everything today has parental control settings.
It's like demanding your TV Live-IDs you by filming everything in front of it allegedly to make sure no child is watching anything above their age-aprouved content.
ID and AI... seems its all coming together.
Don't forget state enforces enshittification.
Ban porn distribution of any type. Asset forfeiture and jail time for anyone who makes a single penny from its creation or distribution. Classify paid porn creation as prostitution and again, jail anyone involved.
This doesn't sound easily abused at all.
Woman's skirt is a millimeter too short for the puritans in charge? Asset forfeiture and jail.
Totally not exactly what our SJW enemies want, like with Evie from Stellar Blade's sequel.
Also, you will never be able to figure out everything the weirdos consider to be porn. Better to try to make them ashamed of being degenerates than rolling that boulder up the hill for eternity.
Yep. The inflection point was when porn and weird fetishes became something "quirky" and something celebrated as opposed to disgusting shit that you kept to yourself.
Which just so happens to be the point when criminalising porn makes sense; bit of a catch-22.
Did you miss the part about "make a single penny"?
And no, it's not what SJW enemies want: they want degeneracy shoved in everyone's face, and normal heterosexual activity hidden.
I say ban it all.
Sure thing, Comstock. See you when the leopards eat your face.
Define porn. And define prostitution. All of this will just be used to destroy men's lives as it already is doing. Women are primary advocates of porn and prostitution bans after all.
>rino
democrat
Imagine still thinking the democrat/republican divide is a meaningful distinction at this stage of the game.
Same government that just failed to pass the SAVE act that 85% of the population wanted.
Peoples. You have to call your elected official, and tell them to vote NO.