Executions are eugenics, you won't catch all of the murderers before they procreate but over a long enough period of time it makes a massive difference.
For a lot of pedos/gays, I don't think they were actually born that way.
Can only speculate about what the actual ratio is, but I think it may well be a large majority of them are the way they are because they're victims of childhood sexual abuse or other traumas.
Memes and genes are similar in nature, though. You cannot easily completely prune a gene, nor a meme. But both can be selected against in their procreation.
If a large amount of victimizers were victims themselves, that implies a memetic procreation chain. Unless it's 100% passed through, a victimizer is going to abuse multiple victims before one of them "inherits" the victimizer meme/gene. Removing the spreader from the genetic/memetic pool stops them from further spreading their meme/gene. If the "spread", the acquiring of the victimizer trait from being victimized, is only 10%, and they victimize 9 people before being caught and removed, that means the spread is reducing (100->90->81->72->63 etc), and overall less victims, every "generation" of victimizers.
You don't go after victims: some of them may, after all, carry a resiliance meme that helps counter the spread. And you select for that resiliance meme by stopping the victimizers as they appear, over time, same as selecting for trust or nonviolence or sociability or intelligence on genetic levels.
But you do go after the spreaders of the malignant meme. And that solves the problem. Is it tragic they were abused and combined with a susceptability thus inherited the victimizer meme? Yes. Should they be stopped from further spreading that meme? Also yes.
EDIT: I'm using "meme" here in a Dawkins/Metal-Gear-style classical sense of the word, the genetic reproduction of ideas, not cat pictures on the internet, obviously.
Low IQ, no impulse control, and short time preference explains the propensity for criminality, it is this gene that explains their propensity for savage violence while doing it.
Gattaca was a society that thought it understood genes but was actually deeply incompetent (investigators who don't investigate because they think their genes and forensics DNA tests prove their work or doctors who think genes somehow stops the addictive chemical properties of nicotine).
If society actually started dealing with dysmorphic individuals (which genetic testing would easily find the appropriate genes in them) it would be more likely to be way more competent than gattaca since it's actually dealing with a problem that is observable and preventable. Gattaca's scientists and society as a whole were just lazy and up their own ass.
The investigators for the murder that started the film's plot were lazy and didn't investigate the murder properly.
The scientists\doctors were convinced people can't get addicted to drugs if they have the right genes. It's a very lazy protocol to operate on the assumption that personal accountability or even basic bio-chemistry has no bearing on life outcomes just because a genetic test suggests an individual shouldn't have issues. I didn't write the scientists should be investigating things though since there's nothing in the movie that they were tasked with. I did write that they were lazy, which I have just established that they're protocols are indeed lazy.
We don't even lock up criminals who have already committed dozens of crimes. We don't really need race-based solutions. We need simple crime and punishment solutions.
Looks like genetic facts are getting harder and harder to cover up.
There’s a theory that England executed all the people with this gene
Not just England, most of the White, European nations did.
Executions are eugenics, you won't catch all of the murderers before they procreate but over a long enough period of time it makes a massive difference.
It's why they don't want us executing the pedos.
For a lot of pedos/gays, I don't think they were actually born that way.
Can only speculate about what the actual ratio is, but I think it may well be a large majority of them are the way they are because they're victims of childhood sexual abuse or other traumas.
Memes and genes are similar in nature, though. You cannot easily completely prune a gene, nor a meme. But both can be selected against in their procreation.
If a large amount of victimizers were victims themselves, that implies a memetic procreation chain. Unless it's 100% passed through, a victimizer is going to abuse multiple victims before one of them "inherits" the victimizer meme/gene. Removing the spreader from the genetic/memetic pool stops them from further spreading their meme/gene. If the "spread", the acquiring of the victimizer trait from being victimized, is only 10%, and they victimize 9 people before being caught and removed, that means the spread is reducing (100->90->81->72->63 etc), and overall less victims, every "generation" of victimizers.
You don't go after victims: some of them may, after all, carry a resiliance meme that helps counter the spread. And you select for that resiliance meme by stopping the victimizers as they appear, over time, same as selecting for trust or nonviolence or sociability or intelligence on genetic levels.
But you do go after the spreaders of the malignant meme. And that solves the problem. Is it tragic they were abused and combined with a susceptability thus inherited the victimizer meme? Yes. Should they be stopped from further spreading that meme? Also yes.
EDIT: I'm using "meme" here in a Dawkins/Metal-Gear-style classical sense of the word, the genetic reproduction of ideas, not cat pictures on the internet, obviously.
Low impulse control and lack of long term planning, I thought this is well known
Known, but stubbornly not acknowledged.
I give it two years before the theft gene is identified.
20 years - Academia will cover up the “bike theft gene” like a transgender manifesto
It overlaps 100% with the big lip gene and the wattamelon and chikken eatin' genes.
The comment section is great.
"iTs tHe wArRioR geNe"
gets conquered by 150 White men.
Ask the comment section about the lack of a "civilization gene".
demonapes can't control themselves
they were bred for evil
Low IQ, no impulse control, and short time preference explains the propensity for criminality, it is this gene that explains their propensity for savage violence while doing it.
on the one hand, gattaca.
on the other hand, niggers.
fucking universe is laughing at us.
Gattaca was a society that thought it understood genes but was actually deeply incompetent (investigators who don't investigate because they think their genes and forensics DNA tests prove their work or doctors who think genes somehow stops the addictive chemical properties of nicotine).
If society actually started dealing with dysmorphic individuals (which genetic testing would easily find the appropriate genes in them) it would be more likely to be way more competent than gattaca since it's actually dealing with a problem that is observable and preventable. Gattaca's scientists and society as a whole were just lazy and up their own ass.
Forgive me, but what specifically were the lazy scientists in Gattaca not investigating?
Are you referring to the fact that Jude Law's Chad paraplegic athlete character smoked & drank after his accident?
The investigators for the murder that started the film's plot were lazy and didn't investigate the murder properly.
The scientists\doctors were convinced people can't get addicted to drugs if they have the right genes. It's a very lazy protocol to operate on the assumption that personal accountability or even basic bio-chemistry has no bearing on life outcomes just because a genetic test suggests an individual shouldn't have issues. I didn't write the scientists should be investigating things though since there's nothing in the movie that they were tasked with. I did write that they were lazy, which I have just established that they're protocols are indeed lazy.
I'd like to ban this hate-fact please.
And for my next trick, I, the great Nahtzini, will combine this with generational and genetic trauma!
It's not a crime gene because female judges won't find any of them guilty.
Let’s start following the movie Minority Report (love the pun) and start using science to lock up the violent niggers. Build more prisons.
We don't even lock up criminals who have already committed dozens of crimes. We don't really need race-based solutions. We need simple crime and punishment solutions.
When most of our criminals can be determined by race, yes we absolutely do. You sound like a jew saying ‘let’s not uphold any laws. ‘