MFW
(twitter.com)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
sauce
well you remember that quote about the greek guy saying women enjoy sex more than men who was immediately blinded by the Consort of Zeus (Hera)? yeah it still a timeless quote and every bit real today
I'm going to remind you Booktok exists. 'Morning Glory Milking Farm' has 24k reviews on Amazon. Men can't compete with the gooning of women.
i had the misfortune of seeing a gooner woman Twitter profile
its basically an endless vortex of cocks (a lot of them black) and gangbangs of the most bestial nature
i say this with full confidence that we are the true romantics and least degenerated sex, even though it is popular to believe otherwise...
When I was a kid I always wondered why my dad was the one always doing romantic things for my mom like getting flowers, giving compliments, taking her on dates or buying expensive jewelry, etc. while my mother largely didn't do things like that. I was taught that women were the romantic sex, since they apparently thought about it all the time.
Time has taught me that men really are the ones with romantic ideals, not women.
I'm sorry I'm old but what is a gooner lol
I think there does seem to be a difference. Women have all kinds of nasty wants, they'll read unlimited fanfic, romance novels, "romantasy," etc. Super explicit and nasty stuff.
What I DON'T see women doing is throwing away hundreds or thousands of dollars on pussy influencers, onlyfans, white knighting, etc.
Women will destroy happy families over a new source of tingles (or lack thereof).
They also write letters to serial killers and pursue relationships with them while incarcerated.
Women also will ignore the red flags of petty criminals & wife beaters if he's dangerous or handsome enough. And will willingly put their children within reach of child molesters as single mothers for guys with dark triad traits.
They might not be simps wrt their wallets usually. But they are willing to recklessly throw away huge social costs & harm their loved ones simply because of their lust for casual sex.
Men will destroy a family for fucks too. I don't know that either one (men or women) is unique. Plenty of stories of both men and women leaving families for the hot new fuck. I've seen both in friends/relatives.
You're 100% right about the weird serial killer / murderer / violence obession. THat has to be the closest to men spending $$.
People do all sorts of crazy stuff and you're grouping them up and playing identity politics
Of course. Men and women are fundamentally different. Men want to provide and women want to be provided for. Men spend on others and women spend on themselves. There's a reason why the sex toy industry caters mostly to women.
Well said. Men can't compete with the gooning of women? We can all be nasty as shit, but the financial component is very damanging for some men.
Because they don't have money
Never seen your GF's bedside drawer, have you? Women will drop serious money on "their toy collection," down to having toys made from casts of celebrity cocks.
I've never seen a male toy that is particularly better than a hand, whereas vibrators do seem to make most women orgasm hard, consistently.
I wonder who the primary buyer of Real Dolls is?
Why would females need throw money when the men line up for them?
I'm not even talking prostitutution. I'm talking about online gooning.
When I was in highschool I was visiting relatives in a rural area. There was a poster on the side of a building showing policemen, firemen, men in suits, etc. It said something like "Real men don't need pornography."
I thought it was dumb.
I've watched my share over the years, and it's easy for me to say now that I'm married and older, but I would consider myself anti-porn now. Most men can partake in moderation and be fine, but it becomes a compulsion for some or many--particularly young men. And that leads to throwing money at onlyfans, paying for porn sites, and more and more degeneracy. It's bad.
I'm surprised Anders Brevik doesn't get more pussy tbh.
You'd be suprised how fast you go from loveless incel to highly desired man once you get some kills under your belt
I stand corrected, apparently he has his share.
The Grand Justiciar was a fakecel, he was always a chad deep down.
I mean, it does make sense. Being able to kill something your size or larger kind of demands a certain level of respect/fear. There is an understanding that men who get into physical conflicts are strong on some level. We all know by now that women absolutely salivate over what they perceive as strong dominant men, even if those men are a danger to themselves.
Okay, but what purpose does a sex scene serve in the game other than sharing your kinks with the world?
I remember when Dragon Age came out and everyone was all "you get to fuck your companions!" I went through the game fucking as many as I could, on my second play through I fucked no one, because it didn't serve a purpose, you could get the bonuses by talking with them.
The next and only time I slept with a companion was on a third playthrough when 2 came out and your previous data was supposed to effect it, so it served a purpose, I wanted to have my first character be queen in 2 by marrying Alistar. Which ended up being a fucking footnote btw. Really the only thing that mattered was getting the gay elf to not betray you so that he would be in the second game as a playable character.
Gay
Okay. A woman marrying a man is gay now, you heard em folks it's gay.
The only people who genuinely enjoy dragon age are either queers... or women
and its hard to tell which one is one which (they both adore Alistair for some reason)
and as far as i remember, the gay elf was not in DA2 as a playable character, he was in like one quest, which was forgettable as hell (since it was on a randomy generated beach terrian map, which was reused for so many generic quests) and lasted like 5 mintues
Sexual encounters in games tickle that same brain part that wants to collect everything, and that wants to avoid FOMO.
This used to be light-hearted, and transgressive in a fun way. With stuff like Leisure Suit Larry, it was overtly silly, and a lot of it was the meta of using a Serious Business (or Education) Machine to do prurient content. The progmob still screams bloody murder over things like Custer's Revenge, but it was only ever silly and fun. There could be something darker here--when I was a kid, most of my dirty material was in games, like banging the frost wizard chick in Ultima 7: Part 2: Serpent Isle. I wouldn't be at all surprised if people like Garriott got a thrill from Putting It where it Doesn't Belong.
It could be just along with the expansion of the "gaming audience," or maybe something changed with the "Hot Coffee" affair, but expectations changed, and a lot of historically un-gamer people started looking for "adult" entertainment in products that were a lot more mainstream. Of course, the blues and the goons, the queers, women, and trannies eventually took control of the gaming means of production, and I believe 100% their purpose is entirely grooming. They mean to bend people.
Fast-forward to today, and I'm baffled that gamers, in the average, give a by, or even encourage, shit like what went down in Baldur's Gate 3. If that's fun, it's a bad person kind of fun, malicious, mean-spirited, warped, and it's definitely an attempt to get normal(ish) people to do things that aren't normal or okay.
The article says the devs thought the minigame helped with character development and the general vibe of the game. Which is true.
I've done that with my playthrough of BG3. I haven't touched a single romance plot, never saw there being a benefit to it.
For those of you hissing at that mini game it should be noted that it was designed by a woman, so... now you don't know what the hell to do. Nah, I'm just kidding. We don't hire women.
Oh no, how dare women like sex?
Guys, the checks are clearing again.
Damnit, I thought all the shekels were going to missiles?