Every relationship with Taylor Swift is a business transaction, including this one. Absolutely nothing about her life is genuine, and I don't believe she's capable of actually feeling affection for anyone other than herself.
Better Bachelor showed that graph 2 years ago and it was dated when he showed it. I think he said it was from 2018, which means it's approaching a decade old. It's surely only gotten worse since then. The risk/reward ratio of marriage hasn't been reasonable for men since long before any of us were born, but "no hymen no diamond" is the only risk management strategy that's anything near approaching adequate for men who insist on rolling the dice.
>13 partners has lower divorce chance than 5-12 partners
I'm sensing a low sample size. Also, that chart doesn't specify if the partners were previous, but does limit the population to people who never remarried. In other words, single women are more likely to increment their partner counts. Which should be kind of obvious. And the odds of someone having been divorced in the past goes up with their age, so now we're at, "single women more likely to increment partner count as time goes on."
Maybe it is really pre-marriage partner count, but it isn't labeled as such. It's not a great chart.
She portrays herself as a whore and I'm sure she is one so that is authentic in a way even if she's a different whore behind close.
It's like how Jack Black plays a fat loser manchild who makes shitty jokes in every movie he's in but I can totally believe he's a fat loser manchild with a cringe sense of humor in real life as well.
Beyond that what are we even meant to take from that?
"If you want prime hot fertile young pussy you should be a soyboy, but if you want to be divorce raped by a used up middle aged hag that's had thousands of different cocks in her before this point you should be an alpha male"
That isn't the sales pitch for the alpha lifestyle that he thinks it is...
Which is perfect for modern women. The “strong silent” type became the “shrieking monkey”. Women have been repeatedly rewarding hyper emotional aggressive behavior.
This. Women think ghetto behavior is alpha. They expect a man to look like Henry Caville but behave like an 80 IQ nigger. Such a man does not exist outside extensive drug usage.
It's all fake anyway so the alpha/beta stuff isn't really applicable. But to your broader point it would absolutely be beta behavior if it wasn't so obviously stage managed. Technically speaking alpha and beta apply to traits and behaviors, not men. Not all beta traits are bad. Some of them are actually a positive if they're accompanied by enough alpha traits. Think tall good looking men with high status jobs that pay well. Being stable and willing able to provide is a beta trait, but no one would call a 6' 4'' investment banker with a Chad jawline a beta male. Beta traits are only a problem when they contradict alpha traits (like wifing up the town bicycle) or when they're being used to try to compensate for lack of alpha traits (think a 5' 6'' rat faced guy with a tech job who goes to therapy because some retard on the internet told him to). That'll get you scammed for resources and divorce raped.
Alpha males that men want to follow are different from Chads that women want to fuck. Women like losers, for the most part, that are tall, big and boyish. Men don't tend to like the same kinds of men as women.
This is why the alpha/Chad terminology can cause controversy.
If society was run by the men that women like, it would be a complete disaster. Women do not pick quality men. Remember, fathers didn't pick their daughters' husband just to oppress women, they did it to help their daughters because women pick terrible men.
This. Chad is a Lancelot, a Face (from the A Team), a Loki. Charming, deceptive, pretty. A smooth rogue. But not necessarily a king amongst men or a man amongst men. I remember there used to be a divide between a "man's man" and a "ladies man" but this got lost culturally over the decades.
Mate, that's the case for ALL women, the difference is HOW they'd like to be handled.
Like you have the classic ditzy type, but there's a lot of tomboy types that'd like a strong dominant man to be more the leader of a pack than them being submissive to them like the ditzy type. Then you have smart women who will either pretend to be more submissive than they are or loyal to the point of ride or die.
Honestly, I think the only reason feminism got so far and so destructive is they made men less dominant through the education and media supplied in the West.
I like a number of her songs but I'm no Swifty. I think the engagement with her life is what makes one a swifty. Not tapping your foot to a couple of songs
I unfortunately have knowledge of Taylor Swift's sordid history due to having a couple female cousins obsessed with her.
She did not give whoever the hell that is her youth. She has been associated with essentially every modern pretty boy musician sexually. Whoever she gave her youth to was 18 years ago.
The whole thing is being managed by her PR people so the usual sexual selection dynamics aren't in play here. Honestly I wouldn't be shocked if contradicting the manosphere was a minor part of the motivation for this.
One of birth control's known side effects is a change in preference in sexual partners for women, skewing more towards effeminate men with androgynous traits. Considering how promiscuous she is/was, probably safe to say she's been on it since she was a teenager.
Baby maker is ringing the final call bell in her head and it's not unreasonable to think she's gone off them, and masculine traits are now interesting to her for the first time in her life as a result as she started looking for a baby daddy.
Unfortunately for the legions of her die hard fans and wannabe imitators, they won't be able to pull a 6'5 pro athlete while they're in their mid-30s the same way Swift did. Should make for a lot of angsty social media content from middle aged women crying about missing their chances at motherhood in the coming years, even more so than we're already seeing that is.
Every relationship with Taylor Swift is a business transaction, including this one. Absolutely nothing about her life is genuine, and I don't believe she's capable of actually feeling affection for anyone other than herself.
She has definitely fucked enough dudes to obliterate her pair-bonding ability.
Some stats show that even just having 3 previous boyfriends will significantly impact their ability to stay in a long term marriage.
Better Bachelor showed that graph 2 years ago and it was dated when he showed it. I think he said it was from 2018, which means it's approaching a decade old. It's surely only gotten worse since then. The risk/reward ratio of marriage hasn't been reasonable for men since long before any of us were born, but "no hymen no diamond" is the only risk management strategy that's anything near approaching adequate for men who insist on rolling the dice.
>13 partners has lower divorce chance than 5-12 partners
I'm sensing a low sample size. Also, that chart doesn't specify if the partners were previous, but does limit the population to people who never remarried. In other words, single women are more likely to increment their partner counts. Which should be kind of obvious. And the odds of someone having been divorced in the past goes up with their age, so now we're at, "single women more likely to increment partner count as time goes on."
Maybe it is really pre-marriage partner count, but it isn't labeled as such. It's not a great chart.
Women love her for her "authenticity", in case you are curious
She portrays herself as a whore and I'm sure she is one so that is authentic in a way even if she's a different whore behind close.
It's like how Jack Black plays a fat loser manchild who makes shitty jokes in every movie he's in but I can totally believe he's a fat loser manchild with a cringe sense of humor in real life as well.
Beyond that what are we even meant to take from that?
"If you want prime hot fertile young pussy you should be a soyboy, but if you want to be divorce raped by a used up middle aged hag that's had thousands of different cocks in her before this point you should be an alpha male"
That isn't the sales pitch for the alpha lifestyle that he thinks it is...
You going to tell that drugged up steroid guy is alpha? Just because he picks a "ball" and hit other guys in the field?
As far as what women are attracted to, yes he's alpha.
He's 6'5" and 250 lbs and gets paid to be in car crashes. Yes I think he's alpha and anyone saying otherwise is just coping
He's physically dominating but he has the temperament of a child
Which is perfect for modern women. The “strong silent” type became the “shrieking monkey”. Women have been repeatedly rewarding hyper emotional aggressive behavior.
This. Women think ghetto behavior is alpha. They expect a man to look like Henry Caville but behave like an 80 IQ nigger. Such a man does not exist outside extensive drug usage.
Hahahaha
Is he still alpha if he is number 250 in line? Just his turn now after all the "soy boys" are done.
It's all fake anyway so the alpha/beta stuff isn't really applicable. But to your broader point it would absolutely be beta behavior if it wasn't so obviously stage managed. Technically speaking alpha and beta apply to traits and behaviors, not men. Not all beta traits are bad. Some of them are actually a positive if they're accompanied by enough alpha traits. Think tall good looking men with high status jobs that pay well. Being stable and willing able to provide is a beta trait, but no one would call a 6' 4'' investment banker with a Chad jawline a beta male. Beta traits are only a problem when they contradict alpha traits (like wifing up the town bicycle) or when they're being used to try to compensate for lack of alpha traits (think a 5' 6'' rat faced guy with a tech job who goes to therapy because some retard on the internet told him to). That'll get you scammed for resources and divorce raped.
This bloke has ZERO self-respect.
You bang it and bounce, but you definitely do not marry someone with Swift's track record.
Unless you think that only incels are alpha, yes.
Alpha males that men want to follow are different from Chads that women want to fuck. Women like losers, for the most part, that are tall, big and boyish. Men don't tend to like the same kinds of men as women.
This is why the alpha/Chad terminology can cause controversy.
If society was run by the men that women like, it would be a complete disaster. Women do not pick quality men. Remember, fathers didn't pick their daughters' husband just to oppress women, they did it to help their daughters because women pick terrible men.
This. Chad is a Lancelot, a Face (from the A Team), a Loki. Charming, deceptive, pretty. A smooth rogue. But not necessarily a king amongst men or a man amongst men. I remember there used to be a divide between a "man's man" and a "ladies man" but this got lost culturally over the decades.
You mean she finally found a decent beard. Because she's a rug muncher.
Proof that even women as powerful as Swift want to be handled?
Mate, that's the case for ALL women, the difference is HOW they'd like to be handled.
Like you have the classic ditzy type, but there's a lot of tomboy types that'd like a strong dominant man to be more the leader of a pack than them being submissive to them like the ditzy type. Then you have smart women who will either pretend to be more submissive than they are or loyal to the point of ride or die.
Honestly, I think the only reason feminism got so far and so destructive is they made men less dominant through the education and media supplied in the West.
Even? Especially.
Every Swifty in this group knows that her last boyfriend refused to marry her and she cried in her song how she gave him her youth
So no one?
Look, I'm not ashamed to admit I listened to teenaged Tay, when she made good music and didn't have the Thousand Cock Stare.
I like a number of her songs but I'm no Swifty. I think the engagement with her life is what makes one a swifty. Not tapping your foot to a couple of songs
I do wonder what that Venn Diagram looks like.
We all know where we were when we first heard :
“I’m pissed off you let me give you all that youth for free.” in “so long, London”
Antonio bringing the firepower.
I unfortunately have knowledge of Taylor Swift's sordid history due to having a couple female cousins obsessed with her.
She did not give whoever the hell that is her youth. She has been associated with essentially every modern pretty boy musician sexually. Whoever she gave her youth to was 18 years ago.
The whole thing is being managed by her PR people so the usual sexual selection dynamics aren't in play here. Honestly I wouldn't be shocked if contradicting the manosphere was a minor part of the motivation for this.
One of birth control's known side effects is a change in preference in sexual partners for women, skewing more towards effeminate men with androgynous traits. Considering how promiscuous she is/was, probably safe to say she's been on it since she was a teenager.
Baby maker is ringing the final call bell in her head and it's not unreasonable to think she's gone off them, and masculine traits are now interesting to her for the first time in her life as a result as she started looking for a baby daddy.
Unfortunately for the legions of her die hard fans and wannabe imitators, they won't be able to pull a 6'5 pro athlete while they're in their mid-30s the same way Swift did. Should make for a lot of angsty social media content from middle aged women crying about missing their chances at motherhood in the coming years, even more so than we're already seeing that is.
And they can't spend millions of dollars for an autistic designer baby like Swift will if she does aim for a kid despite well last her prime years.
Evolutionarily it should be the other way around.
it makes no sense. She wrote an entire album complaining how the “soy” guy dumped her and she wasted her youth with him