I'm no NAZI sympathizer but I do wonder if there will be a time when the war and Germany will be discussed in a more nuanced view than pure evil incarnate for no reason at all.
For awhile the South seemed to be covered pretty fairly, then the CRT shit happened and they became deliberately evil slave holders hurting black people for the fun of it
Protecting your nation from a violent communist takeover is not evil. There is absolutely no reason not to sympathize with men who fought back against commies successfully and then were mass murdered by the entire western world just for doing what was in the interest of self preservation.
He was giving you that nuanced view you mentioned. For some reason, government schools never mention that there was a German communist revolution in 1918 that forced Germany to negotiate from a position of weakness at Versailles and they ignore the continued communist political violence including several localized uprisings throughout the 20s and early 30s.
The NSDAP, nor the DAP, ever prevented a Communist take over. Ever.
The Frei Corps and the Democratic Socialist Party did that. Moreover, the Frei Crops arrested Communist insurrectionists who would become leadership of the NSDAP later, including one Adolf Hitler. He got spared from mass executions.
Unfortunately, this would not stop Hitler from leading another Socialist revolution a few years later, and despite needing to be deported as a foreigner, he would lead a final Socialist revolution through the electoral process before his retarded war-mongering and inability to not commit mass murder utterly destroyed the country.
it's also well known that the moon is made of cheese and on sundays the sky turns purple. any other retarded lies? i feel like tomorrow you'll find a way to tell us Che Guevara was actually a pacifistic monarchist.
So conquering most of Europe in a pointless and bloody war was just "what was in the interest of self preservation"? Protecting their nation from a violent communist takeover requires them conquering France and bombing the shit out of England (who had practically already been defeated)?
Self preservation against communists was why that party gained power. After that it was all revanchism, taking back land lost at Versailles(which was still full of Germans), until France and England responded to the German and Soviet invasion of Poland by declaring war on only Germany.
Initially, Nazi political strategy focused on anti-big business, anti-bourgeoisie, and anti-capitalism, disingenuously using socialist rhetoric to gain the support of the lower middle class;[15] that was later downplayed to gain the support of business leaders.
No, they were still Socialist, their version of Fascism was just combined with a, frankly, faked version of Bushido code. It's actually like if you had a National Socialism, with no opinion towards Jews, and run entirely by a military class. Bushido was their version of Volkism, and actually just as fictional. There was a Bushido code, but it was feudal in nature and about how the elites should operate towards each other, not how each person should operate.
You can tell how Socialist they are from the hilariously modern sounding way they talk about the Japanese Empire. They don't straight up say that they are a higher race of beings in Asia that are required to conquer over lesser Asians, instead they rant about how they are going to be welcomed as liberators against European colonization and oppression.
So yes, it was Socialism all the way down.
Same thing happened in the Decolonization wars of Africa.
For awhile the South seemed to be covered pretty fairly, then the CRT shit happened and they became deliberately evil slave holders hurting black people for the fun of it
World War I tends to be covered more objectively IME, though I think a large part of that is that people just don't care because there are no victim points to be gained in 2025. Either that or people just lump it together with World War II.
Hardly any American today understands the reality behind the scenes of even the Civil War. I have no doubt that the truth about Nazi Germany would not even be a debatable topic probably forever
NPCs: the Nazis were bad because they were pure evil
Contrarian NPCs: the Nazis were good because they killed the Jews
Contrarian pseudo-intellectuals: the Nazis were good because they took down the banks which destroyed their country, as well as and got rid of the degeneracy which prevented people from caring about the destruction of their Nation.
Actual thinking men: the Nazis were an overreaction from a poor situation, correctly identifying the institutions which destroyed their country, but casting their net way too wide which caused a mass murder of innocents. they also bought into their own delusions of grandeur, which convinced them that carrying out a war on two fronts was a good idea. in the end, they murdered millions of innocent people, failed to stop the rise of communism, failed to take over europe, and left Germany in a worse State than when they had taken power.
Its always funny how many will scream about brainwashing NPC behavior, and then think the pinnacle of intelligence is going "the diametrical opposition of that, just as lacking in nuance or thought."
they also bought into their own delusions of grandeur, which convinced them that carrying out a war on two fronts was a good idea
You just slipped back into the NPC full evil view there. The Germans believed the Soviets were preparing a backstab, so gambled on a preemptive backstab of their own.
It might have worked if not for the facts that wars are won by logistics and that the allegedly neutral US, the only great industrial power outside of bombing range, was sending supplies to the Soviets and British to keep them in the war. Just like how we're currently supplying the Ukrainians. Stalin even privately admitted as much, according to Khrushchev's memiors.
While at war with England. And they saw war with Russia as inevitable, so why not interrupt their offensive while they're still building up for it? It's a bad position to be in either way, but one at least takes the initiative.
No, the National Socialists never identified the institutions which destroyed their country because those institutions were the Socialist ones they seized, expanded, weaponized, and then suicided Germany with. Their delusions of grandeur were based on their Socialist meta-narrative and were inseparable from their ideas. The mass murder of innocents was, again, a core component of their Socialist meta-narrative and was unavoidable.
The National Socialists were never an over-reaction, as Hitler himself had attempted to portray the NSDAP as a more reformist or even centrist party that could ensure that Socialism could be done properly. His murder of Rohm was a desperate attempt to prove to the German people that the NSDAP could finally be moderated in it's violence, but still create a working Socialist country.
The NSDAP were the German people deluding themselves into thinking that they could get a form of soft-revolutionary Socialism right this time, and destroying 15 million German lives and every single major city for an inevitable failure.
So, I'm not saying I've read all of these, but I've read some of the older ones, and the rest are cited in some good YouTube essayists. You
Mandatory Reading: (This is the current academic narrative)
The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich - Shirer
^ This is the current academic narrative. If you haven't read this, you won't know what you're arguing about. You basically have to have gone through this once before arguing that the narrative is wrong. (Hint: it is) For the most part, this is the professional part of the Boomer Truth Regime, set after the war by the Social Democrats and Fabians.
Primary Source:
Mien Kampf - Hilter
Inside The Third Reich - Speer
I Will Bear Witness - Kempler
The Goebbels Diaries - Goebbels
My Opposition - Kellner
Secondary Sources:
Life and Death of Adolf Hitler - Payne
Hitler's National Socialism - Zitelmann
Hitler: The Policies of Seduction - Zitelmann
Killing History - Samuels
Hitler's True Believers - Gellately
A Concise History of The Third Reich - Benz
The Road to Serfdom - Hayek
Hitler's Beneficiaries - Aly
The Vampire Economy - Reimann
Hell's Cartel - Jeffreys
The German Freikorps 1918–23 - Jurado
Hitler - Kershaw
Philosophical Sources:
Neither Right Nor Left - Sternhell (Historical origins of Fascism/Nazism)
Origins and Doctrine of Fascism - Gentile
Fascism Viewed From The Right - Evola
Germany Must Perish - Kaufman (an absolute Leftist maniac prior to the war)
The shitty part to all of this is that we clearly need a better meta documentation of Hitler life, let alone the Interwar and Pre-war periods. (I personally refer to 1917-1921 as the Great Communist Revolt, seriously, take a look at how many revolutions, riots, strikes, race riots, and conflicts take place and see how each of them are treated distinctly from one another with no relation; despite all of them being openly Leftist)
Historians themselves fall into the Boomer Truth regime, which actively protects Socialism from criticism, despite the fact that Hitler is & was a revolutionary Socialist for almost his whole life. When you dig into specifics the meta-narrative falls apart, but you have to do it on each topic.
It's like asking someone to prove that there's Left-wing political influence in video games, but you can only do it by reviewing and playing each game to denote each instance of political slant each time, and Leftist domination of game jams, academia, developer conferences, gaming media, and corporate politics are all instantly dismissed.
That’s even if you believe in the death camps. Everyone knows that most Jews died via over exertion while working or died of starvation once Allies had shut down German supply lines. If anything America probably has more dead Jews on their hands than Germany
I'm not even talking about jews, I'm talking about dissidents in general. death camps aside, they hunted down anyone opposed to the Nazi party and imprisoned them without due process, assuming they weren't put to the firing squad. that was the literal role of the Gestapo.
You're all looked at as retards for the "hitler didn't genocide the jews or try, but he should have and it was a good thing, and would be good today" bullshit.
We can literally play this same game with Stalinism and Maoism. But no, political cults are bad, and you are brainwashing yourself when you subscribe to them.
When I see you running around outside trying to kill all the sparrows, the kulaks, or the jews; it means you are, in fact, a brain washed idiot.
I'm no NAZI sympathizer but I do wonder if there will be a time when the war and Germany will be discussed in a more nuanced view than pure evil incarnate for no reason at all.
For awhile the South seemed to be covered pretty fairly, then the CRT shit happened and they became deliberately evil slave holders hurting black people for the fun of it
Protecting your nation from a violent communist takeover is not evil. There is absolutely no reason not to sympathize with men who fought back against commies successfully and then were mass murdered by the entire western world just for doing what was in the interest of self preservation.
I don't remember saying anyone was evil
He was giving you that nuanced view you mentioned. For some reason, government schools never mention that there was a German communist revolution in 1918 that forced Germany to negotiate from a position of weakness at Versailles and they ignore the continued communist political violence including several localized uprisings throughout the 20s and early 30s.
Yes but he's not mainstream and he couldn't pass a college exam, despite being factually accurate, because most professors would flunk him.
The NSDAP, nor the DAP, ever prevented a Communist take over. Ever.
The Frei Corps and the Democratic Socialist Party did that. Moreover, the Frei Crops arrested Communist insurrectionists who would become leadership of the NSDAP later, including one Adolf Hitler. He got spared from mass executions.
Unfortunately, this would not stop Hitler from leading another Socialist revolution a few years later, and despite needing to be deported as a foreigner, he would lead a final Socialist revolution through the electoral process before his retarded war-mongering and inability to not commit mass murder utterly destroyed the country.
it's also well known that the moon is made of cheese and on sundays the sky turns purple. any other retarded lies? i feel like tomorrow you'll find a way to tell us Che Guevara was actually a pacifistic monarchist.
Read Mien Kampf, idiot.
Why was Hitler in Bravaria in 1919?
Who is Kurt Eisner?
Why was Hitler personally photographed at his funeral?
In a way, their intentional ignorance is almost impressive. They ignore everything that isn't convenient to their narratives.
It's not ignorance. They're just lying.
"White Socialism has never been tried"
You'd know about that, right? DARVO.
So conquering most of Europe in a pointless and bloody war was just "what was in the interest of self preservation"? Protecting their nation from a violent communist takeover requires them conquering France and bombing the shit out of England (who had practically already been defeated)?
Self preservation against communists was why that party gained power. After that it was all revanchism, taking back land lost at Versailles(which was still full of Germans), until France and England responded to the German and Soviet invasion of Poland by declaring war on only Germany.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party
weird how your heroes were also commies
really activates the almonds
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program
and their literal party platform
looks like commie bullshit to me
the entirety of ww2 was a socialist brother war
i think maybe the japanese were the only belligerent that weren't socialist, though they were getting wormtongued
No, they were still Socialist, their version of Fascism was just combined with a, frankly, faked version of Bushido code. It's actually like if you had a National Socialism, with no opinion towards Jews, and run entirely by a military class. Bushido was their version of Volkism, and actually just as fictional. There was a Bushido code, but it was feudal in nature and about how the elites should operate towards each other, not how each person should operate.
You can tell how Socialist they are from the hilariously modern sounding way they talk about the Japanese Empire. They don't straight up say that they are a higher race of beings in Asia that are required to conquer over lesser Asians, instead they rant about how they are going to be welcomed as liberators against European colonization and oppression.
So yes, it was Socialism all the way down.
Same thing happened in the Decolonization wars of Africa.
World War I tends to be covered more objectively IME, though I think a large part of that is that people just don't care because there are no victim points to be gained in 2025. Either that or people just lump it together with World War II.
No no, Germans appear only as magic war fairies and are the name of all good. This was just a small infestation is all.
Like when your view us blocked by construction, or something?
I edited the typo, happy now
Is only joke, friend!
Hardly any American today understands the reality behind the scenes of even the Civil War. I have no doubt that the truth about Nazi Germany would not even be a debatable topic probably forever
NPCs: the Nazis were bad because they were pure evil
Contrarian NPCs: the Nazis were good because they killed the Jews
Contrarian pseudo-intellectuals: the Nazis were good because they took down the banks which destroyed their country, as well as and got rid of the degeneracy which prevented people from caring about the destruction of their Nation.
Actual thinking men: the Nazis were an overreaction from a poor situation, correctly identifying the institutions which destroyed their country, but casting their net way too wide which caused a mass murder of innocents. they also bought into their own delusions of grandeur, which convinced them that carrying out a war on two fronts was a good idea. in the end, they murdered millions of innocent people, failed to stop the rise of communism, failed to take over europe, and left Germany in a worse State than when they had taken power.
Its always funny how many will scream about brainwashing NPC behavior, and then think the pinnacle of intelligence is going "the diametrical opposition of that, just as lacking in nuance or thought."
You just slipped back into the NPC full evil view there. The Germans believed the Soviets were preparing a backstab, so gambled on a preemptive backstab of their own.
It might have worked if not for the facts that wars are won by logistics and that the allegedly neutral US, the only great industrial power outside of bombing range, was sending supplies to the Soviets and British to keep them in the war. Just like how we're currently supplying the Ukrainians. Stalin even privately admitted as much, according to Khrushchev's memiors.
while at war with all of europe. No sane general would think that was a good idea.
While at war with England. And they saw war with Russia as inevitable, so why not interrupt their offensive while they're still building up for it? It's a bad position to be in either way, but one at least takes the initiative.
not just england, they also occupied france and other hostile populations with active resistance.
No, the National Socialists never identified the institutions which destroyed their country because those institutions were the Socialist ones they seized, expanded, weaponized, and then suicided Germany with. Their delusions of grandeur were based on their Socialist meta-narrative and were inseparable from their ideas. The mass murder of innocents was, again, a core component of their Socialist meta-narrative and was unavoidable.
The National Socialists were never an over-reaction, as Hitler himself had attempted to portray the NSDAP as a more reformist or even centrist party that could ensure that Socialism could be done properly. His murder of Rohm was a desperate attempt to prove to the German people that the NSDAP could finally be moderated in it's violence, but still create a working Socialist country.
The NSDAP were the German people deluding themselves into thinking that they could get a form of soft-revolutionary Socialism right this time, and destroying 15 million German lives and every single major city for an inevitable failure.
sounds like you know your Nazi history better than I do. do you have any recommended reading?
So, I'm not saying I've read all of these, but I've read some of the older ones, and the rest are cited in some good YouTube essayists. You
Mandatory Reading: (This is the current academic narrative)
^ This is the current academic narrative. If you haven't read this, you won't know what you're arguing about. You basically have to have gone through this once before arguing that the narrative is wrong. (Hint: it is) For the most part, this is the professional part of the Boomer Truth Regime, set after the war by the Social Democrats and Fabians.
Primary Source:
Secondary Sources:
Philosophical Sources:
much obliged!
The shitty part to all of this is that we clearly need a better meta documentation of Hitler life, let alone the Interwar and Pre-war periods. (I personally refer to 1917-1921 as the Great Communist Revolt, seriously, take a look at how many revolutions, riots, strikes, race riots, and conflicts take place and see how each of them are treated distinctly from one another with no relation; despite all of them being openly Leftist)
Historians themselves fall into the Boomer Truth regime, which actively protects Socialism from criticism, despite the fact that Hitler is & was a revolutionary Socialist for almost his whole life. When you dig into specifics the meta-narrative falls apart, but you have to do it on each topic.
It's like asking someone to prove that there's Left-wing political influence in video games, but you can only do it by reviewing and playing each game to denote each instance of political slant each time, and Leftist domination of game jams, academia, developer conferences, gaming media, and corporate politics are all instantly dismissed.
That’s even if you believe in the death camps. Everyone knows that most Jews died via over exertion while working or died of starvation once Allies had shut down German supply lines. If anything America probably has more dead Jews on their hands than Germany
I'm not even talking about jews, I'm talking about dissidents in general. death camps aside, they hunted down anyone opposed to the Nazi party and imprisoned them without due process, assuming they weren't put to the firing squad. that was the literal role of the Gestapo.
If you are right of Pol Pot, you're a nazi according to those freaks.
The last panel would be "you are nazi"
Undoctored comic works better
NPC logic is op and everyone who agrees.
You're all looked at as retards for the "hitler didn't genocide the jews or try, but he should have and it was a good thing, and would be good today" bullshit.
Go back to conpro for all your jew fetish needs
We can literally play this same game with Stalinism and Maoism. But no, political cults are bad, and you are brainwashing yourself when you subscribe to them.
When I see you running around outside trying to kill all the sparrows, the kulaks, or the jews; it means you are, in fact, a brain washed idiot.