NPC logic
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Protecting your nation from a violent communist takeover is not evil. There is absolutely no reason not to sympathize with men who fought back against commies successfully and then were mass murdered by the entire western world just for doing what was in the interest of self preservation.
I don't remember saying anyone was evil
He was giving you that nuanced view you mentioned. For some reason, government schools never mention that there was a German communist revolution in 1918 that forced Germany to negotiate from a position of weakness at Versailles and they ignore the continued communist political violence including several localized uprisings throughout the 20s and early 30s.
Yes but he's not mainstream and he couldn't pass a college exam, despite being factually accurate, because most professors would flunk him.
The NSDAP, nor the DAP, ever prevented a Communist take over. Ever.
The Frei Corps and the Democratic Socialist Party did that. Moreover, the Frei Crops arrested Communist insurrectionists who would become leadership of the NSDAP later, including one Adolf Hitler. He got spared from mass executions.
Unfortunately, this would not stop Hitler from leading another Socialist revolution a few years later, and despite needing to be deported as a foreigner, he would lead a final Socialist revolution through the electoral process before his retarded war-mongering and inability to not commit mass murder utterly destroyed the country.
it's also well known that the moon is made of cheese and on sundays the sky turns purple. any other retarded lies? i feel like tomorrow you'll find a way to tell us Che Guevara was actually a pacifistic monarchist.
Read Mien Kampf, idiot.
Why was Hitler in Bravaria in 1919?
Who is Kurt Eisner?
Why was Hitler personally photographed at his funeral?
In a way, their intentional ignorance is almost impressive. They ignore everything that isn't convenient to their narratives.
So conquering most of Europe in a pointless and bloody war was just "what was in the interest of self preservation"? Protecting their nation from a violent communist takeover requires them conquering France and bombing the shit out of England (who had practically already been defeated)?
Self preservation against communists was why that party gained power. After that it was all revanchism, taking back land lost at Versailles(which was still full of Germans), until France and England responded to the German and Soviet invasion of Poland by declaring war on only Germany.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party
weird how your heroes were also commies
really activates the almonds
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program
and their literal party platform
looks like commie bullshit to me
the entirety of ww2 was a socialist brother war
i think maybe the japanese were the only belligerent that weren't socialist, though they were getting wormtongued
No, they were still Socialist, their version of Fascism was just combined with a, frankly, faked version of Bushido code. It's actually like if you had a National Socialism, with no opinion towards Jews, and run entirely by a military class. Bushido was their version of Volkism, and actually just as fictional. There was a Bushido code, but it was feudal in nature and about how the elites should operate towards each other, not how each person should operate.
You can tell how Socialist they are from the hilariously modern sounding way they talk about the Japanese Empire. They don't straight up say that they are a higher race of beings in Asia that are required to conquer over lesser Asians, instead they rant about how they are going to be welcomed as liberators against European colonization and oppression.
So yes, it was Socialism all the way down.
Same thing happened in the Decolonization wars of Africa.