Too late and too famous ESPECIALLY with the Scottish girl blowing up on social media.
Just before that happening, this might've gone some distance with the 'procedure IS the punishment' but now this risks reigniting it to blow up once again in their faces.
It's also 'weird' that BOTH ones I mention feature a White woman/girl being encroached upon by a minority filming them, trying to provoke only to maintain distance when their intended victim shows they CAN'T be subdued and would fight back.
Odd pattern I'm recognising, I'm sure THAT isn't the reason both of them receive large support....
Even with how cucked and anti-male globohomo Western civ has been for decades, men still have an instinctual need to protect women, even with how brainwashed by feminism women have become and how browbeaten men have been by our women. This is probably why women that show they're not brainwashed by the propaganda, and are being threatened by the globohomo system, men will flock to their defense.
We kinda are despite our money and rights, simply because we've been super deracinated and atomized. At least the Brits and English still have a racial identity.
Lol their racial identity is in worse shape than America's. How do I prove this? They imported millions of Pakistanis and gave them permission to rape exclusively English schoolgirls, hundreds of thousands of them.
We saw what happened when Haitians started eating cats. If Pakistanis in the US set up rape gangs and exclusively targeted white American girls, the MAGA movement, an implicitly white populist awakening, would not stand for it. I know people like to say that black rapists targeting white girls is the same thing as Telford and Rotherham, but it is definitely not.
You can be victimized, oppressed, banished, outlawed, raped etc, but its entirely another thing to lose sight of who you are.
Pakis raping English girls still demonstrates that there is a distinction there. In the USA it's "black american" this and "Latino american" that. American has basically lost any meaning to most founding stock, we have basically decided we don't actually exist and anyone can be American.
Oh fuck you nigger. "Disorderly conduct" my ass, if I don't see 400 niggers getting arrested a day for disorderly conduct I'm not tolerating her getting charged.
In some places speaking loudly can be considered disorderly. In others saying racial slurs is considered disorderly. It depends on the rules of the town, city, state you live in.
they waited for the heat to die down so we won't chimp out. this was always the plan. You just know some kike had a calendar on the wall counting the days until they did this
Your naughty words hurt my feelings! I'm arresting you!
Meanwhile antifa and BLM are calling police officers every dirty filthy vulgar word and spitting on them and they stand down.
Laws only exist to oppress Supreme White Nationalists. Commies and jew paid protesters can spit in officers faces with impunity. Shows you who is really in power.
It's easier to call police officers names because they are government officials and the first Amendment gives citizens the right to express grievance towards the government.
It was very common up to the civil war when everything turned gay and you let ni99ers loose. Fucking retards. Abraham Lincoln should have been shot sooner. Ole Abe slept with his male best friend most of his adult life. Seems gay to me.
Oh, disorderly conduct again? Cops and prosecutors are being fucking desperate for a charge. Good luck, shitheads.
Cops like to use "disorderly conduct" charges to make up a shit charge, and they rationalize it by basically claiming that yelling a curse word in public counts as disorderly conduct. It's why I tell people never to swear on a traffic stop. If you do, and the cops are playing fuck-fuck games, they'll arrest you for DC. This isn't true, but they'll still do it.
And, I'll say again: Shilo shouldn't call children 'nigger'. That is wrong, and there are white people who've been beaten senseless or even killed for not saying it but being accused. She's a shitheel, but she didn't break the law.
Disorderly Conduct normally means being so disruptive that you actually completely breakdown the normal flow and operation of life or an event. Like screaming at people in a restaurant, or blaring loud music at 2 AM.
MN includes a passage in their law for abusive language BUT it must include a aggressive and potentially violent response. Which means that what you said was so bad, that it was effectively "Fighting Words".
Now, despite how some psychos like to kill people for saying 'nigger', that word is NOT "Fighting Words". The Fighting Words doctrine states that speech that is likely to incite violence due to the reasonable understanding that those words convey the speaker's intent to engage in imminent violence are not considered protected speech under the constitution.
Calling a child a nigger, as uncoth as it may be, isn't the same as saying "I'm going to kill you". It's not Fighting Words, because it doesn't convey violent intent.
Considering no one got particularly aggressive in this instance, and no one engaged in physical violence, the claim that this is Disorderly Conduct is also fictional.
Maybe you'll realize that the only people that care about free speech are Europeans by descent and maybe a few anglicized Asians. All this yapping won't mean shit when a bunch of niggers automatically side with each other because they are all niggers, and they throw her ass in prison for not being a part of their tribe.
You're right, the Albanians desperately care about Freedom of Speech... retard. Why do the Asians have to be Anglicized to believe in Freedom of Speech? Couldn't they have just had Russian Grandparents? Couldn't they be Russified? Freedom of Speech is genetically European, right? So, then what would being Anglification have anything to do with it? It's not like it's some sort of anglo cultural artifact that isn't shared with Europe...
Sarcasm aside, please don't pretend that, as a wigger, you are less tribal than blacks, and more incompetently tribal than blacks. We both know you see Freedom of Speech as a jewish hypnotism since it's a liberal concept, and you'd put a bullet in any white man that disagreed with you because "he's secretly jewish" and "he's a race traitor".
I'm tired of pretending you faggots are even racist.
Of course there are outliers. Just like there is a tiny amount of blacks that legitimately care about free speech. The exception doesn't, however, make the rule. You can usually identify an ideological argument vs a realistic pragmatic argument by the speakers reliance on exceptions instead of basing decisions on probability.
Then where is the outrage and defense of Shiloh Hendrix from the black community? There isn't and wont be any because they don't care about a white lady being persecuted for saying nigger. They don't care about your argument. Your position is a subset position held by a tiny amount of people almost exclusively found in western European tradition. Name one country besides European descended ones with even a shadow of free speech law?
Then where is the outrage and defense of Shiloh Hendrix from the black community?
There was plenty at the time. Many blacks literally uploading videos pointing out how stupid it was and how it was backfiring. Lot's literally saying "bro, we're having black fatigue too"
And, oh, is it "western" European now? Freedom of Speech is a big principle in Spain is it? Eastern Europeans are a different race?
Yes easterns are usually balto slavs or Magyar so different genetically. Idk why you have such an issue with identification of people groups. However in the modern age westerner prots seem to be the only place where free speech was codified in law.
And, I'll say again: Shilo shouldn't call children 'nigger'. That is wrong, and there are white people who've been beaten senseless or even killed for not saying it but being accused. She's a shitheel, but she didn't break the law.
You make some good points about law, but this one here I'll take umbrage with. She should absolutely call a nigger a nigger if he or she is being a nigger. There's plenty of decent black people, young and old, that don't act like niggers and instead act like decent and normal human beings, but here you must call a spade a spade.
Its like that old Chris Rock bit about black people vs niggers. Niggerdom isn't really a skin color; it's an attitude and pattern of behavior. And a child practicing his petty theivery by stealing money from a diaper bag is representative of the attitude and pattern of behavior.
I find nothing reprehensible about her actions, and even if we were to entertain special nigger word privileges for who can and can't say it, I'd point out that such moral considerations are for friend groups only; nobody would have batted an eye if it were a black lady calling a white child slurs.
Also, it's funny how much casting Power Word N upsets people, so you should do it more often.
Nigger is a racial slur, and as such, should never be directed towards children. Children should not be taught they are innately evil because a) it's not true, b) you are imparting a sense of identarian resentment on a child that is divorced from their conduct. It teaches the child that there is nothing that they can do right in other person's eyes, because it it's not that they did anything wrong, it's that the child existed near them. The other person would have called the child a nigger, or at least thought of them as a nigger, if the child had simply asked the other person where the bathroom was.
And the child would be right about that. It's a correct assessment. If you're calling a child a racial epithet, you're probably a terrible person who can't be trusted around children, because you're subsumed by collective guilt/blame, and will abuse children for shit they didn't do. As a result, you will teach them to hate your race with the resentment that you've built up, which poisons them with resentment too.
Instead, children have to be protected from racial epithets, and their parents have to teach the children not to simply assume that other groups of people are "enemies" simply because they look different, or are likely to hate them. Parents have to teach children to judge others by their actions, not simply because 'they all hate us'. This is actually a major problem that most black American children have, because they've been groomed by black racists to assume that all white people hate them; so there's no issue either hating them back, or exploiting opportunities and privileges in society to fuck with them.
Yeah, no, I disagree and think you're wrong. Racial slurs don't teach anyone they're inherently evil. They just tell you other people have strong negative opinions about your people.
Humans are not blank slates stamped out of a mold. Every man and woman born is another link in the chain of history, and this chain leads backwards in time to what our ancestors accomplished. This can be both a good and a bad thing.
And being a child is no special defense. You keep defending the child who was attempting to casually rob this woman, and with such casualness that you can fairly assume this isn't the kid's first rodeo. Shilo didn't run up to a random kid and go "hey nigger, get back to the cotton fields" or anything; she reached for a word she knew would hurt when she was agressed upon. She did the verbal equivalent of picking up a rock to throw. All of your assertions about "slur word bad" have this assumption of malintent built into them that simply was not present; this was ENTIRELY due to the ACTIONS that child undertook.
Yes they do, because it's a racial epithet, and that's what it's conferring: an epithet towards a person's race, not their behavior.
Yes, being a child is a special defense because they are a child and need to be both disciplined and raised appropriately to become good adults. Using racial epithets against children damages that.
I don't know that the kid actually stole anything, we're mostly just assuming they did from Shilo's word alone. Assuming it's true, a racial epithet doesn't correct the behavior. Yelling at the child would be better because it discourages the behavior. A racial epithet discourages the race, and nothing else.
. All of your assertions about "slur word bad" have this assumption of malintent built into them
Yes, because the word confers malintent towards a race. That's what that means. That's how the malintent is present.
"Shut the fuck up, you dumb fucking cracker." doesn't confer that a white person is talking to much. The offending action is being white.
Too late and too famous ESPECIALLY with the Scottish girl blowing up on social media.
Just before that happening, this might've gone some distance with the 'procedure IS the punishment' but now this risks reigniting it to blow up once again in their faces.
"Oh, cool, I made another million. Cope and seethe, retards," basically, has a chance of happening. Would be amazing.
It's also 'weird' that BOTH ones I mention feature a White woman/girl being encroached upon by a minority filming them, trying to provoke only to maintain distance when their intended victim shows they CAN'T be subdued and would fight back.
Odd pattern I'm recognising, I'm sure THAT isn't the reason both of them receive large support....
Even with how cucked and anti-male globohomo Western civ has been for decades, men still have an instinctual need to protect women, even with how brainwashed by feminism women have become and how browbeaten men have been by our women. This is probably why women that show they're not brainwashed by the propaganda, and are being threatened by the globohomo system, men will flock to their defense.
Hear me out - if the US didn’t have a constitution set up from a hard fought war 2 centuries ago - we would be cucked harder than the UK
This 100%.
We kinda are despite our money and rights, simply because we've been super deracinated and atomized. At least the Brits and English still have a racial identity.
Do they though? In any regard other than theory?
Only theoretically. They have been speed run through deracination and are way ahead of the US now.
Well said.
More so than Americans who have ceded american identity to anyone who gets papers. Time will tell whether Europeans will resist their ethnicide.
Lol their racial identity is in worse shape than America's. How do I prove this? They imported millions of Pakistanis and gave them permission to rape exclusively English schoolgirls, hundreds of thousands of them.
We saw what happened when Haitians started eating cats. If Pakistanis in the US set up rape gangs and exclusively targeted white American girls, the MAGA movement, an implicitly white populist awakening, would not stand for it. I know people like to say that black rapists targeting white girls is the same thing as Telford and Rotherham, but it is definitely not.
You can be victimized, oppressed, banished, outlawed, raped etc, but its entirely another thing to lose sight of who you are.
Pakis raping English girls still demonstrates that there is a distinction there. In the USA it's "black american" this and "Latino american" that. American has basically lost any meaning to most founding stock, we have basically decided we don't actually exist and anyone can be American.
The argument that liberals make that "guns are the problem" is the same argument reversed that "the constitution is the solution"
Both of them just sit there on a table. What matters is the will to use them and enforce their protection.
The Constitution stopped existing in 1913. Anyone pretending otherwise deserves what they get.
It just means that it will take slightly longer to get to the same destination.
The attorneys office is the only criminal here. Arrest and deport to El Salvador
Oh fuck you nigger. "Disorderly conduct" my ass, if I don't see 400 niggers getting arrested a day for disorderly conduct I'm not tolerating her getting charged.
Is her GiveSendGo still active? i might throw a few dozen dollars for her lawyer fees
edit: yep its up https://www.givesendgo.com/shilohhendrix
Do these get reset, or am I just misremembering? I could've sworn she got over a million already.
you're definitely misrememebring, the last time i visited the page it was around 700,000ish
I recall it being a bit shy of a million but my memory could be wrong there.
Insane how blacks can say this word but if a white person does it’s a crime. Double standard.
Afaict she committed no crime. She didn’t even touch the people.
Disorderly conduct is what they charge you with whe you didn't do anything illegal, yet they still want to punish you.
Yeah but was she disorderly. She just called the nigga a nigga and gave them the middle finger
So can you not call someone names or flip them off?
In some places speaking loudly can be considered disorderly. In others saying racial slurs is considered disorderly. It depends on the rules of the town, city, state you live in.
Doesn't change the first amendment. Those laws conflict with supreme law in theory.
you have no case and should be sacked and imprisoned yourself.
Doesn't matter to them if there is no case. In their dreams, she gets convicted. If not, then the legal process itself is the punishment.
More money for her if true and easy case win.
they waited for the heat to die down so we won't chimp out. this was always the plan. You just know some kike had a calendar on the wall counting the days until they did this
Your naughty words hurt my feelings! I'm arresting you!
Meanwhile antifa and BLM are calling police officers every dirty filthy vulgar word and spitting on them and they stand down.
Laws only exist to oppress Supreme White Nationalists. Commies and jew paid protesters can spit in officers faces with impunity. Shows you who is really in power.
It's easier to call police officers names because they are government officials and the first Amendment gives citizens the right to express grievance towards the government.
It used to be legal for citizens to duel
Literally shoot at each other
Now you get arrested for calling non whites names. Of course, non whites get to call Whites names with impunity.
We used to have a president who did illegal duels in the White House.
It was very common up to the civil war when everything turned gay and you let ni99ers loose. Fucking retards. Abraham Lincoln should have been shot sooner. Ole Abe slept with his male best friend most of his adult life. Seems gay to me.
https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/history-dueling-and-state-constitutions-0
Oh, disorderly conduct again? Cops and prosecutors are being fucking desperate for a charge. Good luck, shitheads.
Cops like to use "disorderly conduct" charges to make up a shit charge, and they rationalize it by basically claiming that yelling a curse word in public counts as disorderly conduct. It's why I tell people never to swear on a traffic stop. If you do, and the cops are playing fuck-fuck games, they'll arrest you for DC. This isn't true, but they'll still do it.
And, I'll say again: Shilo shouldn't call children 'nigger'. That is wrong, and there are white people who've been beaten senseless or even killed for not saying it but being accused. She's a shitheel, but she didn't break the law.
Disorderly Conduct normally means being so disruptive that you actually completely breakdown the normal flow and operation of life or an event. Like screaming at people in a restaurant, or blaring loud music at 2 AM.
MN includes a passage in their law for abusive language BUT it must include a aggressive and potentially violent response. Which means that what you said was so bad, that it was effectively "Fighting Words".
Now, despite how some psychos like to kill people for saying 'nigger', that word is NOT "Fighting Words". The Fighting Words doctrine states that speech that is likely to incite violence due to the reasonable understanding that those words convey the speaker's intent to engage in imminent violence are not considered protected speech under the constitution.
Calling a child a nigger, as uncoth as it may be, isn't the same as saying "I'm going to kill you". It's not Fighting Words, because it doesn't convey violent intent.
Considering no one got particularly aggressive in this instance, and no one engaged in physical violence, the claim that this is Disorderly Conduct is also fictional.
Maybe you'll realize that the only people that care about free speech are Europeans by descent and maybe a few anglicized Asians. All this yapping won't mean shit when a bunch of niggers automatically side with each other because they are all niggers, and they throw her ass in prison for not being a part of their tribe.
You're right, the Albanians desperately care about Freedom of Speech... retard. Why do the Asians have to be Anglicized to believe in Freedom of Speech? Couldn't they have just had Russian Grandparents? Couldn't they be Russified? Freedom of Speech is genetically European, right? So, then what would being Anglification have anything to do with it? It's not like it's some sort of anglo cultural artifact that isn't shared with Europe...
Sarcasm aside, please don't pretend that, as a wigger, you are less tribal than blacks, and more incompetently tribal than blacks. We both know you see Freedom of Speech as a jewish hypnotism since it's a liberal concept, and you'd put a bullet in any white man that disagreed with you because "he's secretly jewish" and "he's a race traitor".
I'm tired of pretending you faggots are even racist.
Of course there are outliers. Just like there is a tiny amount of blacks that legitimately care about free speech. The exception doesn't, however, make the rule. You can usually identify an ideological argument vs a realistic pragmatic argument by the speakers reliance on exceptions instead of basing decisions on probability.
American Blacks care about freedom of speech because they're American, fool.
These are not outliers, you just need to lie and make up shit to claim you're right.
Then where is the outrage and defense of Shiloh Hendrix from the black community? There isn't and wont be any because they don't care about a white lady being persecuted for saying nigger. They don't care about your argument. Your position is a subset position held by a tiny amount of people almost exclusively found in western European tradition. Name one country besides European descended ones with even a shadow of free speech law?
There was plenty at the time. Many blacks literally uploading videos pointing out how stupid it was and how it was backfiring. Lot's literally saying "bro, we're having black fatigue too"
And, oh, is it "western" European now? Freedom of Speech is a big principle in Spain is it? Eastern Europeans are a different race?
Yes easterns are usually balto slavs or Magyar so different genetically. Idk why you have such an issue with identification of people groups. However in the modern age westerner prots seem to be the only place where free speech was codified in law.
I haven't seen any evidence of this
Then try looking.
I have. There's plenty of evidence to show they don't care about free speech.
You make some good points about law, but this one here I'll take umbrage with. She should absolutely call a nigger a nigger if he or she is being a nigger. There's plenty of decent black people, young and old, that don't act like niggers and instead act like decent and normal human beings, but here you must call a spade a spade.
Its like that old Chris Rock bit about black people vs niggers. Niggerdom isn't really a skin color; it's an attitude and pattern of behavior. And a child practicing his petty theivery by stealing money from a diaper bag is representative of the attitude and pattern of behavior.
I find nothing reprehensible about her actions, and even if we were to entertain special nigger word privileges for who can and can't say it, I'd point out that such moral considerations are for friend groups only; nobody would have batted an eye if it were a black lady calling a white child slurs.
Also, it's funny how much casting Power Word N upsets people, so you should do it more often.
Nigger is a racial slur, and as such, should never be directed towards children. Children should not be taught they are innately evil because a) it's not true, b) you are imparting a sense of identarian resentment on a child that is divorced from their conduct. It teaches the child that there is nothing that they can do right in other person's eyes, because it it's not that they did anything wrong, it's that the child existed near them. The other person would have called the child a nigger, or at least thought of them as a nigger, if the child had simply asked the other person where the bathroom was.
And the child would be right about that. It's a correct assessment. If you're calling a child a racial epithet, you're probably a terrible person who can't be trusted around children, because you're subsumed by collective guilt/blame, and will abuse children for shit they didn't do. As a result, you will teach them to hate your race with the resentment that you've built up, which poisons them with resentment too.
Instead, children have to be protected from racial epithets, and their parents have to teach the children not to simply assume that other groups of people are "enemies" simply because they look different, or are likely to hate them. Parents have to teach children to judge others by their actions, not simply because 'they all hate us'. This is actually a major problem that most black American children have, because they've been groomed by black racists to assume that all white people hate them; so there's no issue either hating them back, or exploiting opportunities and privileges in society to fuck with them.
Yeah, no, I disagree and think you're wrong. Racial slurs don't teach anyone they're inherently evil. They just tell you other people have strong negative opinions about your people.
Humans are not blank slates stamped out of a mold. Every man and woman born is another link in the chain of history, and this chain leads backwards in time to what our ancestors accomplished. This can be both a good and a bad thing.
And being a child is no special defense. You keep defending the child who was attempting to casually rob this woman, and with such casualness that you can fairly assume this isn't the kid's first rodeo. Shilo didn't run up to a random kid and go "hey nigger, get back to the cotton fields" or anything; she reached for a word she knew would hurt when she was agressed upon. She did the verbal equivalent of picking up a rock to throw. All of your assertions about "slur word bad" have this assumption of malintent built into them that simply was not present; this was ENTIRELY due to the ACTIONS that child undertook.
Yes they do, because it's a racial epithet, and that's what it's conferring: an epithet towards a person's race, not their behavior.
Yes, being a child is a special defense because they are a child and need to be both disciplined and raised appropriately to become good adults. Using racial epithets against children damages that.
I don't know that the kid actually stole anything, we're mostly just assuming they did from Shilo's word alone. Assuming it's true, a racial epithet doesn't correct the behavior. Yelling at the child would be better because it discourages the behavior. A racial epithet discourages the race, and nothing else.
Yes, because the word confers malintent towards a race. That's what that means. That's how the malintent is present.
"Shut the fuck up, you dumb fucking cracker." doesn't confer that a white person is talking to much. The offending action is being white.
Calm down psycho. Nothing was actually stolen, because you can normally just take shit back as an adult.
Do not murder the children schizo.
'We smell shekels on her. Get her to spend them on our legal system.' - some jew, probably.
At the end of the day, all societies will punish blasphemy.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the First Amendment added as a safeguard to protect against this explicit misuse of government authority?