I don't buy not JUST for the reasons mentioned but also because I heard of him around this time and he seemed the more self destructive type on substances and vices than the abusive type.
The fact these accusations have apparently been sat on for 20 years invalidates their authenticity too, if you are a victim of rape, REPORT IT IMMEDIATELY so it's at least on file at this time.
There really should just be a statute of Limitations on reporting sex crimes. If they find a guy from a crime 20 years after, then whatever. No new crimes.
The establishment is taking care of business using the time tested method of sexual allegations, but only when they deem that it matters. When it's inconvenient for the establishment (widespread and systematic rape of young white girls), it suddenly isn't such a great indiscretion.
I hate that I can't just hate Brand anymore for being annoying, ugly and unfunny without being associated with the people who hate him for these retarded reasons.
Basically all the accusations I've ever seen leveled at him at either highly suspicious or "you looked at that guy and expected otherwise? You deserved it" level, not even vaguely a "maybe but I don't care" level.
I'd be inclined to give "some credit" if his name just hit the headlines for some reason. Like a guy runs for office for the first time & the woman then tells her (legitimate) story to stop him? She wouldn't have much reason to otherwise.
BUT!
Brand's been famous for YEARS now. This is a targeted fake attack. They'd have to have clear videos and a signed & notarized confession before I'll believe it.
I'd be inclined to give "some credit" if his name just hit the headlines for some reason. Like a guy runs for office for the first time & the woman then tells her (legitimate) story to stop him? She wouldn't have much reason to otherwise.
No. If it was real she should have brought it to light when it happened. That these women don't bring this stuff up until their target has garnered fame, money and influence tells us everything we need to know: She's a lying sack of shit and her accusations aren't real.
Well yes! That is the usual "default" for us deciding if it's real or not: was it told at the time?
Biden's accuser registered a complaint with 2 entities, iirc? Documented and verified. She told a half-dozen people or more, iirc.
Blasey Ford told... no one. Not one person. Her husband? Nope. Her BFF? Nope. Her therapist? Nope. Not a soul. Not even a diary entry.
But there's also women who've filed false claims too, so this isn't the sole arbiter of verification.
There's been women in the past (at least locally, like Peter Nygaard eh?) who stayed silent for fear of reprisal (for example) but came forward when he got into politics or when others accused him too. They could back their accounts up, usually, like one woman's doctor visit with pictures of her injuries.
So it is possible the event was real but the women stayed silent. Just not in this case, it's all people approached by leftist lawyers seeking a "victim" to go after him.
The part where she was under duress. Even a signed confession is nullified by that, so saying she cannot be telling the truth because it took so long is also nullified.
Of course her statement still has to stand on its own merit, just like a false report "all those years ago" is disputed by its lack of merit.
Russell first became aware of these allegations when former lovers contacted him and said they were being tracked down and asked by journalists for these types of stories for smears.
Who cares? This dude isn’t a real Christian, he’s friends with people like Diddy, his girlfriend was a literal Rothschild, there about a million pics of him depicting signs and symbols telling you exactly what he is, a satanic Freemason…..he’s trying to promote new age BS as if it’s real Christianity, that shit will damn your soul if you buy into it. Jews know you are more likely to trust their shills if you think they are victims of “the globalists”. He isn’t a victim, he’s a part of their lies, just like Alex jones and so many others.
I don't buy not JUST for the reasons mentioned but also because I heard of him around this time and he seemed the more self destructive type on substances and vices than the abusive type.
The fact these accusations have apparently been sat on for 20 years invalidates their authenticity too, if you are a victim of rape, REPORT IT IMMEDIATELY so it's at least on file at this time.
Feminists worked hard to make sure to #BelieveAllWomen, unless it's against one of their own allies like Bill Clinton.
There really should just be a statute of Limitations on reporting sex crimes. If they find a guy from a crime 20 years after, then whatever. No new crimes.
They sat on this for 20 years until he became red-pilled? Ugh.
The establishment is taking care of business using the time tested method of sexual allegations, but only when they deem that it matters. When it's inconvenient for the establishment (widespread and systematic rape of young white girls), it suddenly isn't such a great indiscretion.
Must be a rich woman involved if the BBC is covering it.
I’m so old I remember when Julian Assange reported on Hillary Clinton’s DNC cheating and suddenly got rape charges against him (all later dropped).
UK has been using false sexual abuse charges against heroes since at least Alan Turing.
Don't forget about the time where they accused Julian Assange of grooming a child or vid-sexing a child from the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
I hate that I can't just hate Brand anymore for being annoying, ugly and unfunny without being associated with the people who hate him for these retarded reasons.
Basically all the accusations I've ever seen leveled at him at either highly suspicious or "you looked at that guy and expected otherwise? You deserved it" level, not even vaguely a "maybe but I don't care" level.
you let it sit for 20 years you either got over it long ago or you're just a grifter
Every single allegation that takes this long to come out is false. No exceptions. This is just malicious lies designed to destroy a man.
I'd be inclined to give "some credit" if his name just hit the headlines for some reason. Like a guy runs for office for the first time & the woman then tells her (legitimate) story to stop him? She wouldn't have much reason to otherwise.
BUT! Brand's been famous for YEARS now. This is a targeted fake attack. They'd have to have clear videos and a signed & notarized confession before I'll believe it.
No. If it was real she should have brought it to light when it happened. That these women don't bring this stuff up until their target has garnered fame, money and influence tells us everything we need to know: She's a lying sack of shit and her accusations aren't real.
As I said: No exceptions.
Well yes! That is the usual "default" for us deciding if it's real or not: was it told at the time?
Biden's accuser registered a complaint with 2 entities, iirc? Documented and verified. She told a half-dozen people or more, iirc. Blasey Ford told... no one. Not one person. Her husband? Nope. Her BFF? Nope. Her therapist? Nope. Not a soul. Not even a diary entry.
But there's also women who've filed false claims too, so this isn't the sole arbiter of verification.
There's been women in the past (at least locally, like Peter Nygaard eh?) who stayed silent for fear of reprisal (for example) but came forward when he got into politics or when others accused him too. They could back their accounts up, usually, like one woman's doctor visit with pictures of her injuries.
So it is possible the event was real but the women stayed silent. Just not in this case, it's all people approached by leftist lawyers seeking a "victim" to go after him.
What part of "no exceptions" was ambiguous?
The part where she was under duress. Even a signed confession is nullified by that, so saying she cannot be telling the truth because it took so long is also nullified.
Of course her statement still has to stand on its own merit, just like a false report "all those years ago" is disputed by its lack of merit.
You're an idiot.
I for one find it impossible to believe that women willing to sell butthole pics for $11 a month might also lie for money.
Cuck boy in the replies asking people to wait to hear the evidence still pretending we live in a fair society
Russell first became aware of these allegations when former lovers contacted him and said they were being tracked down and asked by journalists for these types of stories for smears.
I for one find it impossible to believe that women willing to sell butthole pics for $11 a month might also lie for money.
What are you implying!?
What are YOU implying?
I know now, without a doubt, that kingdom hearts is light!
😸 Nice! I have no idea what it means, I never played the game, but still nice!
It’s whimsical nonsense with no meaning, I just like writing it everywhere at work.
That th UK establishment is fake and gay.
Just like you,
All I'm hearing is: several women were more than okay with a rapist running around potentially raping other women.
Sick and tired of this shit. If you don't go to the police, every single following victim is just as much your fault.
Who cares? This dude isn’t a real Christian, he’s friends with people like Diddy, his girlfriend was a literal Rothschild, there about a million pics of him depicting signs and symbols telling you exactly what he is, a satanic Freemason…..he’s trying to promote new age BS as if it’s real Christianity, that shit will damn your soul if you buy into it. Jews know you are more likely to trust their shills if you think they are victims of “the globalists”. He isn’t a victim, he’s a part of their lies, just like Alex jones and so many others.