You REALLY don't understand Chinese censorship do you?
They don't want you mentioning CERTAIN EVENTS IN A SQUARE or certain places that should be free, or degeneracy but they also don't want you basically being overly negative online.
Why, because being negative online opens you to be critical online and that invites you to ferment rebellious ideas against the party narrative.
Thanks to their social credit system, you have as much chance getting snatched for being a Chinese blackpiller as saying free Tibet.
If they didn't want holocaust to happen, they shouldn't have created Weimar Republic condition in the country they are the guests of. From the track record so far, they are frankly doing terrible job so far and refuse to learn from history.
regardless of it happening or not, it shouldn't be a cudgel that one group gets to use to get their way in every interaction nearly 100 years after the fact.
Not only that, it's the only historical event in all of history, where if you deny that it took place, or happened differently than is claimed, you are automatically labeled as a card carrying member of the villains. The logic is not sound.
Well, doesn’t the second thing follow from the first position? I’m not saying I believe the holocaust was false—certain individual accounts and such, sure, but at scale, no—but if it turned out it was false and there was a specific group of people that had orchestrated a massive hoax on such a scale in order to gain social power and make their race largely immune to criticism, all while pushing endless guilt upon people who they vilified and took reparations money from… wouldn’t you be excused for saying “gee, maybe the world would be in a better state if those guys really had been persecuted”?
Again, that’s not my position, but I find this particular sneer of “you say it didn’t happen but wish it had” to betray something of an inability to model other minds, or the logical implications of various beliefs.
I only learned of this "based" Asian's existence when Blonde (Rebecca Hargraves, formerly of the Matt & Blonde show) interviewed him on her channel about a year ago.
I noticed that some other dissident RW Twitter accounts were calling him out this week (particularly that small NOBLE account who broke the news of Patriot Front getting sued for 2.8 million for some jogger inciting shit), specifically with Kwon Lee's support for mixed race couples like Candace Owen being celebrated as inevitable in White nations.
Yeah, I don't know what to make of this guy. Not super familiar with him (also saw him in that interview), but he's pretty shifty, I think. He also purged a bunch of his videos recently, it seems. My first thought was censorship, but I looked up his Rumble and they weren't there either. So either he wasn't consistent in his uploading (not sure if they ever existed on Rumble or not) or he deleted a bunch of spergy videos. Never a fan of rewriting history.
He was also one of those "don't vote guys," I think. I find that nonsense annoying. He's also pretty hateful and judgmental for a "Christian," and no, I'm not saying Christians have to be all over the top soft and fluffy or anything, but he still seems a bit much.
He's based on some things, seems insane on others, and is a blackpiller and/or retard on others. He's not all bad, but nowhere near as smart or clever as he thinks he is.
It's really the problem with the dichotomy of having based minorities being the front-facing, tip-of-the-spear types promoting nationalism, Christian nationalism and White nationalism on account of their intersectionality privilege.
They can be allies but can never really be full Charter members. Our interests aren't the same.
You REALLY don't understand Chinese censorship do you?
They don't want you mentioning CERTAIN EVENTS IN A SQUARE or certain places that should be free, or degeneracy but they also don't want you basically being overly negative online.
Why, because being negative online opens you to be critical online and that invites you to ferment rebellious ideas against the party narrative.
Thanks to their social credit system, you have as much chance getting snatched for being a Chinese blackpiller as saying free Tibet.
That sounds familiar. Well at least they are reducing "regretted time spent".
Correct. Red Book (Red Note) is still governed by Chinese cyber laws, including Picking Quarrels and Provoking Trouble.
Everything is sunshine and rainbows on CCP Net. As you said, being negative online leads to critical thinking of people and policies.
Do you know who was there at founding of the Chinese Communist Party?
Rent-free.
Explain to me why jews are so protected everywhere?
We all know the reason, it doesn't change the fact that you post 5+ articles a day about them meaning they very clearly live rent free in your head.
Because the Holocaust happened
I'll bet I can talk shit about the Tutsis and not get banned for it.
allegedly
Ah, yes. "the holocaust didn't happen, but if it did it was totally based and they deserved it".
Yes
I unironically love it here! This is the only fun place left online to interact with strangers.
Thanks for being honest about your faggotry. That makes you a less shitty person than the rest of your leftist buddies.
If being a leftist means i am not a shabbos goy then so be it.
If they didn't want holocaust to happen, they shouldn't have created Weimar Republic condition in the country they are the guests of. From the track record so far, they are frankly doing terrible job so far and refuse to learn from history.
Turns out, the #1 cause of antisemitism is something called chutzpah.
Actually it was "I'll bet I can get ghost or Antonio to lose their shit with a single word and it will be hilarious".
But now that you mention it...
Okay jew
regardless of it happening or not, it shouldn't be a cudgel that one group gets to use to get their way in every interaction nearly 100 years after the fact.
Not only that, it's the only historical event in all of history, where if you deny that it took place, or happened differently than is claimed, you are automatically labeled as a card carrying member of the villains. The logic is not sound.
Go tell a lefty that The Trail of Tears or Wounded Knee didn't happen, they'll have the same reaction.
Now, tell them the Armenian Genocide didn't happen, and they'll wholeheartedly agree.
As long as it paints Whites as the bad guys, you can't deny it.
Well, doesn’t the second thing follow from the first position? I’m not saying I believe the holocaust was false—certain individual accounts and such, sure, but at scale, no—but if it turned out it was false and there was a specific group of people that had orchestrated a massive hoax on such a scale in order to gain social power and make their race largely immune to criticism, all while pushing endless guilt upon people who they vilified and took reparations money from… wouldn’t you be excused for saying “gee, maybe the world would be in a better state if those guys really had been persecuted”?
Again, that’s not my position, but I find this particular sneer of “you say it didn’t happen but wish it had” to betray something of an inability to model other minds, or the logical implications of various beliefs.
Maybe, but we all know that's not what the retards are saying. They just hate jews and want them all genocided.
Well, wouldn’t you, if you believed what they believe? That’s kind of my point.
You don't think it's odd that this is literally the only ethnic historical event that this applies to?
if it did, why aren't jews praising non-german white people for stopping it?
I only learned of this "based" Asian's existence when Blonde (Rebecca Hargraves, formerly of the Matt & Blonde show) interviewed him on her channel about a year ago.
I noticed that some other dissident RW Twitter accounts were calling him out this week (particularly that small NOBLE account who broke the news of Patriot Front getting sued for 2.8 million for some jogger inciting shit), specifically with Kwon Lee's support for mixed race couples like Candace Owen being celebrated as inevitable in White nations.
Yeah, I don't know what to make of this guy. Not super familiar with him (also saw him in that interview), but he's pretty shifty, I think. He also purged a bunch of his videos recently, it seems. My first thought was censorship, but I looked up his Rumble and they weren't there either. So either he wasn't consistent in his uploading (not sure if they ever existed on Rumble or not) or he deleted a bunch of spergy videos. Never a fan of rewriting history.
He was also one of those "don't vote guys," I think. I find that nonsense annoying. He's also pretty hateful and judgmental for a "Christian," and no, I'm not saying Christians have to be all over the top soft and fluffy or anything, but he still seems a bit much.
He's based on some things, seems insane on others, and is a blackpiller and/or retard on others. He's not all bad, but nowhere near as smart or clever as he thinks he is.
It's really the problem with the dichotomy of having based minorities being the front-facing, tip-of-the-spear types promoting nationalism, Christian nationalism and White nationalism on account of their intersectionality privilege.
They can be allies but can never really be full Charter members. Our interests aren't the same.
Maybe the Sicilians had the right idea all along.
They got communism from the Bolsheviks
He even had a bolshevik advisor whispering in his ear. One that had previously worked in the US government.
https://forward.com/schmooze/159051/a-jew-in-maos-china/