"Disturbed white student with history of racist posts shoots up school. Only solution is to raise taxes, give the government full control over the Internet, and raise taxes."
A lot of radical feminists hate the fact men have superior strength than them. A lot of radical feminism can be reduced down to a fear of men's ability to dominate them physically. Radical feminists can't accept the differences between men and women. Women have advantage they can employ over men which is what dom/sub can be compared to or ying/yang and other elements. Women have the ability to employ their strengths to hack men's brain but radical feminists absolutely despise the need to employ these strategies as many of them are bad at it compared to other women and resent needing to do anything because of a man.
In any case black men seem far more intimidating than White men when weighing just the physicality. Women don't really understand fighting IQ, actual strength, tempered aggression, strategy, etc... they just see the basis aggression and physical size. Blacks are at the top of the chain for men that must be eliminated for making radical feminists scared of men.
The reason these women hate black men is not the same as the reason a conventional White male racist would dislike black men. These women just want to hate on men and blacks seem apex for what they hate, whereas White men dislike blacks because they see them as inferior and a detriment to society, in part because of the same reasons radical feminists hate them but it's different.
It's a shame so many plebs will likely completely miss the distinction.
Women don't really understand fighting IQ, actual strength, tempered aggression, strategy,
If they did, would it make a difference? No amount of “fighting IQ” and “strategy” (unless we’re counting being adequately armed) would make them able to stand up to a black man or white man who was really willing to attack them, and in terms of likelihood of using untempered aggression unpredictably or for relatively small reasons, I think they’d be correct to be more worried about black men, on average, than whites.
I think the guy who posted that, like many others, misused the word strategy and included concepts like tactics, approaches, patterns for executing a task that align to strategies.
Sure, maybe, but even if you rewrite his comment to be something like "women don't understand self-defense strategies or the tactics for implementing them," then you still end up at the point where whether they understand any of that or not doesn't impact the fact that black men are—on average—correct to identify as the largest threat.
Because if so it feels like a lot of people are going full Gell-Mann and jumping on this screenshot because it fits with their own perceptions, in particular for this topic like Imp would do before even any info was released.
Copied from the other thread.
I read her manifesto. She was 15. Born female, not transgender. Her manifesto says nothing about nazism. Nothing about men. She just hated everyone equally because she was bullied in every school for being quiet, was despised by her own alcoholic/druggie parents, etc. She wanted to end humanity because she saw EVERYONE as scum in her words.
She idolized many male shooters in her manifesto. One of the people she idolized was a shooter who was openly Nazi, so I wonder if the media will create that narrative. Watch out for that.
She manipulated her father to buy a handgun, which she then stole from the gun locker at home. She had planned to kill herself but wanted to take out bullies first.
The manifesto releases themselves are questionable because there is confirmed fuckery going on either way. She seems to have been on an edgelord discord server, unless everyone involved is lying. The one who released this excerpt (in OP) is someone from the discord, who has access to unwatermarked versions of photos that Ngo and others are circulating. Someone else is faking DMs from this first person (1, 2 ). The intent could be variously to erase any connection to eceleb 'RadFemHitler', to incriminate the first person or else just fuck with people.
In any case the source of the bulk of the manifesto (Slatzism) is sus since the account holder is acting like an attention whore ('I would release it all but TOS uWu') and making definitive assertions which can't be supported, eg. connection to radfemhitler is 'confirmed fake', shooter is 'not non-binary' (yet she used the screen name 'Crossixir' and They/Them pronouns ). Basically troublemakers are involved in the evidence chain already and no proven non-retards have picked up the slack.
The manifesto releases themselves are questionable because there is confirmed fuckery going on either way
Apparently there are a shitload of deletions going on across the web both live and archived links relating to this, so there is absolutely fuckery going on, more so than some might realise.
Also, I believe Slatzism is on good terms with RFH and the editor of a radfem-leaning news site (reduxx), so the potential for conflict of interest is obviously there.
Her dad’s fb is still up for the time being. I nuked my fb long ago, but in case anyone has the time, inclination, and autism to dig in, here it is: https://m.facebook.com/jeff.rupnow/
Technically, this is posting a manifesto. But there's also discussion that there is legitimate questions of authenticity about the source. If you find articles that accurately link to a credible source, then you can post that. But don't just post the raw manifesto.
Ok so now media will cover the story
"Disturbed white student with history of racist posts shoots up school. Only solution is to raise taxes, give the government full control over the Internet, and raise taxes."
more vaccinations. vaccine passports, lockdowns and climate taxes might help
I think you forgot raise taxes there
also defund the police and then raise taxes because there isn't enough money to pay for private security and then rise the taxes
It’s a rad fem, maybe if it’s a terf they’ll blame jk rowling
Yeah... no. MSM won't give this anywhere near the attention other stories would receive because of the parties involved.
True
A lot of radical feminists hate the fact men have superior strength than them. A lot of radical feminism can be reduced down to a fear of men's ability to dominate them physically. Radical feminists can't accept the differences between men and women. Women have advantage they can employ over men which is what dom/sub can be compared to or ying/yang and other elements. Women have the ability to employ their strengths to hack men's brain but radical feminists absolutely despise the need to employ these strategies as many of them are bad at it compared to other women and resent needing to do anything because of a man.
In any case black men seem far more intimidating than White men when weighing just the physicality. Women don't really understand fighting IQ, actual strength, tempered aggression, strategy, etc... they just see the basis aggression and physical size. Blacks are at the top of the chain for men that must be eliminated for making radical feminists scared of men.
The reason these women hate black men is not the same as the reason a conventional White male racist would dislike black men. These women just want to hate on men and blacks seem apex for what they hate, whereas White men dislike blacks because they see them as inferior and a detriment to society, in part because of the same reasons radical feminists hate them but it's different.
It's a shame so many plebs will likely completely miss the distinction.
Wow you're retarded.
If they did, would it make a difference? No amount of “fighting IQ” and “strategy” (unless we’re counting being adequately armed) would make them able to stand up to a black man or white man who was really willing to attack them, and in terms of likelihood of using untempered aggression unpredictably or for relatively small reasons, I think they’d be correct to be more worried about black men, on average, than whites.
I think the guy who posted that, like many others, misused the word strategy and included concepts like tactics, approaches, patterns for executing a task that align to strategies.
Sure, maybe, but even if you rewrite his comment to be something like "women don't understand self-defense strategies or the tactics for implementing them," then you still end up at the point where whether they understand any of that or not doesn't impact the fact that black men are—on average—correct to identify as the largest threat.
That's normal feminism
Broken clocks and all that.
Women can't do anything right.
Jesus, Daniel Penny killed more darkies than her, and he wasn’t even trying.
Yet another thing trannies are better at than real women smdh step it up ladies!
Supposedly she had a manifesto in Google docs but didn't make it public when she shared it.
meanwhile in hell:
Most Black people HATE OTHER Black people, especially in America. Funny how it's a huge issue when White people share the dislike.
The perfect woman doesn’t exist… Well she doesn’t anymore.
Is this the random Discord screenshot Andy Ngo posted that doesn't seem to be in the full manifesto releases others are linking?
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/19A0tPFHRm/breaking-just-now--police-identi/c
Because if so it feels like a lot of people are going full Gell-Mann and jumping on this screenshot because it fits with their own perceptions, in particular for this topic like Imp would do before even any info was released.
Copied from the other thread.
The manifesto releases themselves are questionable because there is confirmed fuckery going on either way. She seems to have been on an edgelord discord server, unless everyone involved is lying. The one who released this excerpt (in OP) is someone from the discord, who has access to unwatermarked versions of photos that Ngo and others are circulating. Someone else is faking DMs from this first person (1, 2 ). The intent could be variously to erase any connection to eceleb 'RadFemHitler', to incriminate the first person or else just fuck with people.
In any case the source of the bulk of the manifesto (Slatzism) is sus since the account holder is acting like an attention whore ('I would release it all but TOS uWu') and making definitive assertions which can't be supported, eg. connection to radfemhitler is 'confirmed fake', shooter is 'not non-binary' (yet she used the screen name 'Crossixir' and They/Them pronouns ). Basically troublemakers are involved in the evidence chain already and no proven non-retards have picked up the slack.
Apparently there are a shitload of deletions going on across the web both live and archived links relating to this, so there is absolutely fuckery going on, more so than some might realise.
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/19A0tQMZyJ/madison-police-chief-on-shooter-/c/4ZHjyBo8lte
Also, I believe Slatzism is on good terms with RFH and the editor of a radfem-leaning news site (reduxx), so the potential for conflict of interest is obviously there.
Did she shoot all the niggers that she hated so much? If not why not ? Why only children were they nigger children. If not why not?
These things never ever add up and they always try for a gun grab immediately after
Her dad’s fb is still up for the time being. I nuked my fb long ago, but in case anyone has the time, inclination, and autism to dig in, here it is: https://m.facebook.com/jeff.rupnow/
Half based
Edited to add: Total Feminist Death
I could have fixed her
He went full retard going for kids though. Never go full retard.
Post Reported for: Rule 12 - Disinformation x2
Post Removed for: Rule 1 - Illegal Activity
Technically, this is posting a manifesto. But there's also discussion that there is legitimate questions of authenticity about the source. If you find articles that accurately link to a credible source, then you can post that. But don't just post the raw manifesto.
White womens are not influenced by minorities the slightest bit.
That is reserved for another tribe.