A lot of radical feminists hate the fact men have superior strength than them. A lot of radical feminism can be reduced down to a fear of men's ability to dominate them physically. Radical feminists can't accept the differences between men and women. Women have advantage they can employ over men which is what dom/sub can be compared to or ying/yang and other elements. Women have the ability to employ their strengths to hack men's brain but radical feminists absolutely despise the need to employ these strategies as many of them are bad at it compared to other women and resent needing to do anything because of a man.
In any case black men seem far more intimidating than White men when weighing just the physicality. Women don't really understand fighting IQ, actual strength, tempered aggression, strategy, etc... they just see the basis aggression and physical size. Blacks are at the top of the chain for men that must be eliminated for making radical feminists scared of men.
The reason these women hate black men is not the same as the reason a conventional White male racist would dislike black men. These women just want to hate on men and blacks seem apex for what they hate, whereas White men dislike blacks because they see them as inferior and a detriment to society, in part because of the same reasons radical feminists hate them but it's different.
It's a shame so many plebs will likely completely miss the distinction.
Women don't really understand fighting IQ, actual strength, tempered aggression, strategy,
If they did, would it make a difference? No amount of “fighting IQ” and “strategy” (unless we’re counting being adequately armed) would make them able to stand up to a black man or white man who was really willing to attack them, and in terms of likelihood of using untempered aggression unpredictably or for relatively small reasons, I think they’d be correct to be more worried about black men, on average, than whites.
I think the guy who posted that, like many others, misused the word strategy and included concepts like tactics, approaches, patterns for executing a task that align to strategies.
Sure, maybe, but even if you rewrite his comment to be something like "women don't understand self-defense strategies or the tactics for implementing them," then you still end up at the point where whether they understand any of that or not doesn't impact the fact that black men are—on average—correct to identify as the largest threat.
A lot of radical feminists hate the fact men have superior strength than them. A lot of radical feminism can be reduced down to a fear of men's ability to dominate them physically. Radical feminists can't accept the differences between men and women. Women have advantage they can employ over men which is what dom/sub can be compared to or ying/yang and other elements. Women have the ability to employ their strengths to hack men's brain but radical feminists absolutely despise the need to employ these strategies as many of them are bad at it compared to other women and resent needing to do anything because of a man.
In any case black men seem far more intimidating than White men when weighing just the physicality. Women don't really understand fighting IQ, actual strength, tempered aggression, strategy, etc... they just see the basis aggression and physical size. Blacks are at the top of the chain for men that must be eliminated for making radical feminists scared of men.
The reason these women hate black men is not the same as the reason a conventional White male racist would dislike black men. These women just want to hate on men and blacks seem apex for what they hate, whereas White men dislike blacks because they see them as inferior and a detriment to society, in part because of the same reasons radical feminists hate them but it's different.
It's a shame so many plebs will likely completely miss the distinction.
If they did, would it make a difference? No amount of “fighting IQ” and “strategy” (unless we’re counting being adequately armed) would make them able to stand up to a black man or white man who was really willing to attack them, and in terms of likelihood of using untempered aggression unpredictably or for relatively small reasons, I think they’d be correct to be more worried about black men, on average, than whites.
I think the guy who posted that, like many others, misused the word strategy and included concepts like tactics, approaches, patterns for executing a task that align to strategies.
Sure, maybe, but even if you rewrite his comment to be something like "women don't understand self-defense strategies or the tactics for implementing them," then you still end up at the point where whether they understand any of that or not doesn't impact the fact that black men are—on average—correct to identify as the largest threat.
That's normal feminism
Wow you're retarded.