Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

34
The DEI incompetence angle is a psyop. This was a deep state hit all the way.
posted 1 year ago by current_horror 1 year ago by current_horror +34 / -0

Closest rooftop is unsecured plus there’s a fucking ladder? No social media presence for a 20 year old leftist? They magically can’t get into his phone?

“Muh diversity hires, amirite?”

24 comments share
24 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (24)
sorted by:
▲ 18 ▼
– Assassin47 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

Yep, leaning that way, although I think DEI incompetence is an important part of any good conspiracy. (when you want to steal an election you employ the dumbest loyal negros and women at key polling centers) They were planning to let the kid shoot and then bump him off the whole time. They didn't expect him to miss.

I do want to hear more about the shooter before making any firm conclusions.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

I seriously doubt it.

if the deep State tried to assassinate trump, they wouldn't do it on live TV in front of a bunch of supporters. And they most especially wouldn't hire some amateur Columbine wannabe to pull the trigger.

An assassination of Trump would be in the form of a sudden heart attack from poison food or a pin prick from a handshake. it offers complete deniability.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

Unless they wanted to send a message by blowing him up on 4k video. Prigozhin didn't have a quiet natural death.

The downside of using an experienced guy is that he'd have to essentially agree to a kamikaze mission, as we saw, plus his identity and history would be blasted over the country. Would look a little weird if he was a Marine sniper who did some contracting for the Agency no?

I'm halfway with you though, I could easily see incompetence instead of malice. We need a lot more answers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

What is the point of killing a 78-year-old obese man, who I'm sorry to say will die naturally soon enough - make him a revered martyr and God-like figure to tens of millions?

And if you're going to engage in such a high-stakes assassination attempt, why would you pick a guy who is so bad at it that 1 of his 8 (reported) bullets graze the guy's ear? Surely, as much as it is a bad to murder him, it's far worse to try and then fail.

Don't get me wrong. I don't put this past the deep state. I'm not saying they're too good and noble to do this. I'm saying they're too smart to do it. If it turns out that they're not smart, so much the better.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– ernsithe 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

While your first paragraph is retarded because it's obvious what they stand to gain in the short-term, you're right about the deep state being more competent than this. Besides no social media presence? Locked phone? Those are absolutely squandered opportunities to steer the narrative. I don't think they'd be so wasteful.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

you're right about the deep state being more competent than this.

Having worked as a federal contractor, I have some serious doubts about the notion that the government is competent in anything other than sporadic fits that cannot be planned around.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Considering that Trump got nothing accomplished in his first term that went against the Deep State, in their position, I would try to manage Trump rather than go to war with him. Hell, I'm pretty sure he would be in a worse position if they had not tried to sabotage him at every turn.

A president's second term is almost always a failure, or at least a disappointment. It won't be different for Trump. He likely won't get much accomplished as a lame duck, let alone when it goes against the Deep State. Now, weighing that against the downside of making him a martyr for all the ages, a new Gracchus who will inspire people 83 years from now? In their position, I'd prefer a Trump presidency 10 times over.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Considering that Trump got nothing accomplished in his first term that went against the Deep State, in their position, I would try to manage Trump rather than go to war with him.

The people calling him the "end of democracy" would try to manage Trump instead of going to war right?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– current_horror [S] 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

Predictably retarded Antonio lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Can you also explain why it is wrong?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Assassin47 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

Assuming that was the plan, I think they just wanted to win the election. Then they would handle Biden as they see fit. And when I say "they" I don't pretend the Deep State is one coordinated blob. There are various factions with different levels of smarts.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 83671R18 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

You do realize that they're in debt now. right? They can't afford the things they could around 20, even 10 years ago.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Theacefospades 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

I think it's a gambit pileup.

Kid is absolutely the product of the deep state. But that doesn't for a single second mean that the highest of the high sanctioned this.

The nature of the deepstate is that it isn't conspiracy, it's natural progression of the same types of evil people converging on their version of "justice."

It's inevitable that sometimes things fall out of step. It's important to remember that our enemy isn't a guy ag the top, or a circle of nine or any or that bullshit. Nor is it a hivemind. It's parts aren't always going to act intelligently or even with unity of purpose.

permalink parent save report block reply
View 2 more comments
▲ 7 ▼
– Kienan 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

It's both.

It's incompetence, and intentional allowance. That's my theory at least.

Most on the ground agents were legitimately incompetent. Higher-ups and planners were in on it, as well as potentially the sniper team.

I'm also wondering if there was a second shooter. If - big if - the information that the shooter was confronted by an officer seconds before the shots is true...it turns a pretty good shot into an amazing shot; assuming the confrontation is true (again, stressing that that's far from certain), it becomes harder to believe that he got so close to a headshot under those circumstances.

Crooks was almost definitely a patsy, and was killed as planned. Whether or not he was the primary shooter, and the one who winged Trump, is still up in the air.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Gizortnik 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

This kid seems like a fucking mess. It's possible he is a genuine nutter, but I do wonder if he was used as a patsy.

I still maintain that this was the dumbest possible move they could make. There's no benefit for them, even if he had died.

I still maintain that their plan would probably have been to False Flag Biden with Patriot Front, and use that to justify a crackdown on the Republican party generally.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Kienan 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Unless they actually had orders not to fire, the snipers hesitating so long makes me think the shooter was a patsy. Who's patsy isn't clear yet, but the situation is so sketchy I do suspect some level of conspiracy, so I do think he was a patsy, and meant to die.

Also, it's not too late to go after Biden, and I'm worried that's part of the plan. The "Deep State" or whoever can overshadow the attempted assassination of Trump, and save themselves from Biden, by attempting to or succeeding in taking out Biden, and then blaming Trump/supporters/The Right.

Organic or otherwise, someone took at shot at Trump, you know, Literally Hitler. The current power structure needs for alleged "Trump supporters" to behave violently in turn. Sadly, I see at least the very real possibility of false flags and attacks against Democrats and minorities.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Gizortnik 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I'm still not clear on what the sniper saw or chose to do. It looked like he needed to adjust his rifle to get into position and had to look over his scope to see the target.

Maybe he thought he needed permission, maybe he was told he did, and maybe he was just out of position for the shot.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– subbookkeeper 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Can't get into his phone.

I think it was Edward Snowden??? or someone similar that said they've seen what happens. They just bring a unit of some kind in, plug it in and have full access. Maybe the local PD can't get in, but the feds can.

I don't think the DEI incompetence and deep state hit are mutually exclusive. JFK was a hit, and there wasn't incompetent secret service at the time. The SS just being useless is icing on the cake.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dionysus2 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

No no no, boys. If it was a real hit there would have been multiple redundant shooters. Didn’t we learn anything from JFK?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mischief_Maven 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

DEI incompetence serves as plausible deniability for the deepstate mafia to gaslight the public. It's a funny distraction for people unable to accept how deep malice has seeped in our institutions like rot.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy