First, he is wrong about Americans: prior to 1965 Americans were a Nation largely described as comprised of White Christian descendants of various European countries. Note here nation means people not government. Country, Nation, and State are not synonyms. Were there other types of people living in the United States? Yes. Doesn't change anything.
Second, if I were to say in public what this guy is saying, I would be accused of anti-Semitism.
America has been successfully invaded. No one fired a single shot because defending majority white nations is “racist”. Therefore, the continued existence of white peoples and cultures is “racist”. Therefore, “anti-racism” is simply anti-whiteness.
Also, Hart-Cellar was put forward by a Jewish politician who made it his life’s mission to change the demographics of America. Prior to Hart-Cellar, immigration was proportional in order to maintain relative demographics. Immediately after the bill passed, the white euro share of the nation precipitously and steadily declined.
The people who voted for HC also pinky-promised that it would not be abused to change the demographics of the country. Leftists have always been liars. If they were honest about their intentions, it would reveal their resentment and envy and hatred, making it impossible for them to gain power. So they have always veiled their true goals behind hollow generic values. The predictable and deliberate outcomes of leftist policies must always be framed as either accidental or inevitable.
Hart-Cellar was essentially made possible by CRA of 64. I've become partial to the idea some have put forward that CRA64 is essentially a crypto Constitution that Americans are unaware of. If inequalities are against the law and the government believes it has a mandate to stamp it out, then it has authority to control every aspect of public life. Americans would never have voted in favor of requiring schools to hire homosexuals, change the demographics of the country, or any of the other milestones of the past 60 years. But the government seems to move independent of the people using said crypto constitution as justification. It seem that HC is just one of many implementations of this idea.
It’s a funny impulse, this need to boast about their achievements even as they lead directly to ruin. There are more sophisticated members of the tribe who try to keep this shit quiet. But then you have the sort of people who publish massive TIME magazine articles explicitly outlining how they stole an election.
They brag about being the spearhead of every subversive movement, every activist group, every compromised institution. Yet when you simply quote them, it's a 'conspiracy theory'.
repeal hart-cellar, invalidate all fraudulent citizenships, and deport everyone who came here since 1965. and anyone that gets in the way of their deportation.
My dude, America can’t even deny citizenship to randos who happened to be born here after their parents illegally crossed the border. Because activist judges are allowed to interpret in ways that are antithetical to the existence of a coherent nation.
I strongly suggest everybody download the video while you can, because I've seen Dom take videos like these down in the past (i.e. Rabbis telling the truth of what really goes on).
Again, trustworthy longtime members only, or more mods will only make things even worse. I've bitched about current moderation repeatedly, but I'd still rather take inconsistent and often no moderation over overactive moderation any day of the week. In fact, on most issues I still want even less moderation than we currently have.
It would basically just be nice to stamp out obvious trolls. That's it. That's all mods need to do.
I think it goes beyond that, "respectful". It still feels too easy for even some longtime members, who'd step up to take the position, to fall into the trap of shutting down things they don't like. The rules can be abused in different ways depending on the mindset of the mod. The current arrangement is an annoying stalemate.
That's kind of what I meant by trustworthy; someone who can be trusted not to go on a crusade for their own personal biases. Someone who can be trusted not to abuse their power. Someone who can be trusted to actually respect free speech.
Basically we need someone who is trustworthy enough to ban the current idiot spamming every thread, but who is simultaneously too lazy to actually moderate the board in any meaningful way.
Do we really need a narcissist with a gun and anger management issues? Downvoting should suffice. I'd institute an auto-collapse feature over a specific threshold like what was used on slashdot, but it could be easily abused by soapbox and whatnot.
First, he is wrong about Americans: prior to 1965 Americans were a Nation largely described as comprised of White Christian descendants of various European countries. Note here nation means people not government. Country, Nation, and State are not synonyms. Were there other types of people living in the United States? Yes. Doesn't change anything.
Second, if I were to say in public what this guy is saying, I would be accused of anti-Semitism.
Before Hart-Cellar: 85-90% euro white.
60 years later: less than 50% euro white.
America has been successfully invaded. No one fired a single shot because defending majority white nations is “racist”. Therefore, the continued existence of white peoples and cultures is “racist”. Therefore, “anti-racism” is simply anti-whiteness.
Also, Hart-Cellar was put forward by a Jewish politician who made it his life’s mission to change the demographics of America. Prior to Hart-Cellar, immigration was proportional in order to maintain relative demographics. Immediately after the bill passed, the white euro share of the nation precipitously and steadily declined.
The people who voted for HC also pinky-promised that it would not be abused to change the demographics of the country. Leftists have always been liars. If they were honest about their intentions, it would reveal their resentment and envy and hatred, making it impossible for them to gain power. So they have always veiled their true goals behind hollow generic values. The predictable and deliberate outcomes of leftist policies must always be framed as either accidental or inevitable.
Hart-Cellar was essentially made possible by CRA of 64. I've become partial to the idea some have put forward that CRA64 is essentially a crypto Constitution that Americans are unaware of. If inequalities are against the law and the government believes it has a mandate to stamp it out, then it has authority to control every aspect of public life. Americans would never have voted in favor of requiring schools to hire homosexuals, change the demographics of the country, or any of the other milestones of the past 60 years. But the government seems to move independent of the people using said crypto constitution as justification. It seem that HC is just one of many implementations of this idea.
The CRA is unconstitutional on its own face. Freedom of association now only means corporations can exist according to the government.
Yep, it is a 2nd Constitution and MLK is a replacement Founding Father.
100%. I think Brown vs board of education was the legal precedent that essentially enshrined the CRA as the new constitution.
This is them bragging that they will NEVER assimilate.
Any of them that were going to assimilate did so 2000 years ago.
What a retarded speech
It’s a funny impulse, this need to boast about their achievements even as they lead directly to ruin. There are more sophisticated members of the tribe who try to keep this shit quiet. But then you have the sort of people who publish massive TIME magazine articles explicitly outlining how they stole an election.
They brag about being the spearhead of every subversive movement, every activist group, every compromised institution. Yet when you simply quote them, it's a 'conspiracy theory'.
repeal hart-cellar, invalidate all fraudulent citizenships, and deport everyone who came here since 1965. and anyone that gets in the way of their deportation.
My dude, America can’t even deny citizenship to randos who happened to be born here after their parents illegally crossed the border. Because activist judges are allowed to interpret in ways that are antithetical to the existence of a coherent nation.
I strongly suggest everybody download the video while you can, because I've seen Dom take videos like these down in the past (i.e. Rabbis telling the truth of what really goes on).
Ok mr. David- please tell everyone who were the owners of most of the ships that brought slaves to USA?
The cotton wasn't worth it.
That was unexpected. Since when did they have embedded video?
More importantly, the fucking jannoid is asleep at the wheel as always.
We need additional mods. Basic redundancy for this exact sort of situation.
Again, trustworthy longtime members only, or more mods will only make things even worse. I've bitched about current moderation repeatedly, but I'd still rather take inconsistent and often no moderation over overactive moderation any day of the week. In fact, on most issues I still want even less moderation than we currently have.
It would basically just be nice to stamp out obvious trolls. That's it. That's all mods need to do.
I think it goes beyond that, "respectful". It still feels too easy for even some longtime members, who'd step up to take the position, to fall into the trap of shutting down things they don't like. The rules can be abused in different ways depending on the mindset of the mod. The current arrangement is an annoying stalemate.
That's kind of what I meant by trustworthy; someone who can be trusted not to go on a crusade for their own personal biases. Someone who can be trusted not to abuse their power. Someone who can be trusted to actually respect free speech.
Basically we need someone who is trustworthy enough to ban the current idiot spamming every thread, but who is simultaneously too lazy to actually moderate the board in any meaningful way.
Do we really need a narcissist with a gun and anger management issues? Downvoting should suffice. I'd institute an auto-collapse feature over a specific threshold like what was used on slashdot, but it could be easily abused by soapbox and whatnot.