First, he is wrong about Americans: prior to 1965 Americans were a Nation largely described as comprised of White Christian descendants of various European countries. Note here nation means people not government. Country, Nation, and State are not synonyms. Were there other types of people living in the United States? Yes. Doesn't change anything.
Second, if I were to say in public what this guy is saying, I would be accused of anti-Semitism.
America has been successfully invaded. No one fired a single shot because defending majority white nations is “racist”. Therefore, the continued existence of white peoples and cultures is “racist”. Therefore, “anti-racism” is simply anti-whiteness.
Also, Hart-Cellar was put forward by a Jewish politician who made it his life’s mission to change the demographics of America. Prior to Hart-Cellar, immigration was proportional in order to maintain relative demographics. Immediately after the bill passed, the white euro share of the nation precipitously and steadily declined.
The people who voted for HC also pinky-promised that it would not be abused to change the demographics of the country. Leftists have always been liars. If they were honest about their intentions, it would reveal their resentment and envy and hatred, making it impossible for them to gain power. So they have always veiled their true goals behind hollow generic values. The predictable and deliberate outcomes of leftist policies must always be framed as either accidental or inevitable.
Hart-Cellar was essentially made possible by CRA of 64. I've become partial to the idea some have put forward that CRA64 is essentially a crypto Constitution that Americans are unaware of. If inequalities are against the law and the government believes it has a mandate to stamp it out, then it has authority to control every aspect of public life. Americans would never have voted in favor of requiring schools to hire homosexuals, change the demographics of the country, or any of the other milestones of the past 60 years. But the government seems to move independent of the people using said crypto constitution as justification. It seem that HC is just one of many implementations of this idea.
First, he is wrong about Americans: prior to 1965 Americans were a Nation largely described as comprised of White Christian descendants of various European countries. Note here nation means people not government. Country, Nation, and State are not synonyms. Were there other types of people living in the United States? Yes. Doesn't change anything.
Second, if I were to say in public what this guy is saying, I would be accused of anti-Semitism.
Before Hart-Cellar: 85-90% euro white.
60 years later: less than 50% euro white.
America has been successfully invaded. No one fired a single shot because defending majority white nations is “racist”. Therefore, the continued existence of white peoples and cultures is “racist”. Therefore, “anti-racism” is simply anti-whiteness.
Also, Hart-Cellar was put forward by a Jewish politician who made it his life’s mission to change the demographics of America. Prior to Hart-Cellar, immigration was proportional in order to maintain relative demographics. Immediately after the bill passed, the white euro share of the nation precipitously and steadily declined.
The people who voted for HC also pinky-promised that it would not be abused to change the demographics of the country. Leftists have always been liars. If they were honest about their intentions, it would reveal their resentment and envy and hatred, making it impossible for them to gain power. So they have always veiled their true goals behind hollow generic values. The predictable and deliberate outcomes of leftist policies must always be framed as either accidental or inevitable.
Hart-Cellar was essentially made possible by CRA of 64. I've become partial to the idea some have put forward that CRA64 is essentially a crypto Constitution that Americans are unaware of. If inequalities are against the law and the government believes it has a mandate to stamp it out, then it has authority to control every aspect of public life. Americans would never have voted in favor of requiring schools to hire homosexuals, change the demographics of the country, or any of the other milestones of the past 60 years. But the government seems to move independent of the people using said crypto constitution as justification. It seem that HC is just one of many implementations of this idea.
The CRA is unconstitutional on its own face. Freedom of association now only means corporations can exist according to the government.
Yep, it is a 2nd Constitution and MLK is a replacement Founding Father.
100%. I think Brown vs board of education was the legal precedent that essentially enshrined the CRA as the new constitution.