It's all right wing hedge funds? So why do they lean left?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Any time they talk about money and the rich, they are automatically right-wing. It's simple commie class warfare. Except most of the billionaires are leftist, but don't tell the useful idiots that. The billionaires end up as the commissars in the new government.
Useful idiots are a trope for a reason.
Lol, there's a Boomer I know who claim himself to be a socialist.
He owns a hundred acres of farmland with a rental property, and he rents the fields as well. He's literally been living off his personal capital for decades, but he's supposedly a Leftist.
yes. but also, what even is 'right wing"? because neocon jews are in there as well as homo tech billionaires. they're all globalist and liberal. any actual right wing person (reactionary, against the establishment) isn't even allowed to talk and sometime not even allowed to have a bank account.
the whole right/left thing is a engineered distraction to hide truth.
Anyone is right wing if they can be used as an example to further Globohomo.
I was gonna say: As far as political donors go, it's the jews, stupid. They're homo jew tech billionaires. You have to go down the list for Ds and Rs for a while before you find a goy. Note the difference between this list and ostensible richest people in the world. Jews are both wealthy and unusually politically active with their money. Some large majority are left wing, but such right wing as there are are in charge of the Republican party.
Limousine leftists are a fucking plague. Preach things like diversity that they can afford to live far from.
Now what race and religion primarily benefit? I'm just asking questions
This isn't a direct reply, but you made a pretty open ended post, so I'm putting this here.
The idea that it's money that holds influence rather than jews is not an either-or proposition. Jews are both highly ethnocentric, and they have an unusual amount of money. Most of the money, as far as I can tell.
I think the best way to understand this is that fiat money is jewish. In a "Render Unto Caesar" way, it's all their money. Banking of the central type is a prerequisite for fiat money. And, in the US and Europe, that has been controlled by jews since the invention of banking as we know it. It's a system that they setup, and so to say that they have a lot of 0's in their account is kind of like saying Satoshi Namamoto has a lot of Bitcoin. IOW, Duh.
A tangentially related point is that the fiat money-central banking system has money trickle up via inflation and interest. The money is made form nothing, and then it is lent out a series of times at higher interest rates with someone (usually, basically a bank) profiting each time. The profit is in proportion to the amount of money they are able to lend, as distinct from the amount of money they have. In a simple example (simple for this kind of finance), the bank lends the money that came from nowhere to the big corpo for capital expenditures. The bank also pays interest to the Feds. The important part is: the corpo pays interest on the loan greater than the Fed's vig, thus adding money for the bank despite the fact that the original source for the loan money was "nobody." The Fed also ends up with some interest here, which I suppose is just more money that they created. The money creation is inflation, and then you can see from above that the direction the money moves due to interest is "up."
Hi.
Bridgewater Associates
https://www.bridgewater.com/people
https://www.bridgewater.com/people/nir-bar-dea
Prior to joining Bridgewater in 2015, Nir served as Advisor to the Israeli Mission to the United Nations... bachelor’s degree in Finance from the Interdisciplinary Center at IDC Herzliya
Israel's only private university, located in Herzliya, Tel Aviv District. It was founded in 1994 as the IDC Herzliya private college
.....
I could go on and do this for other top dogs at Bridgewater Associates... or I could look up the world's second largest hedge fund and check them out from the top.... but I don't have the time right now, because unlike Nir and so many of his ethnic compatriots, I have to provide actual, literal products and services in order to justify my continued existence.
Because "bad thing is caused by the right". It's just the brainless cooking up any lie to avoid dealing with the cognitive dissonance staring them right in the face.
Leftoid doublespeak at every turn.
You can look up billionaire spending on elections and see that nearly double the amount fo Billionaires supported Biden against Trump in 2020.
These same leftoids will gleefully call Conservatives poor hillbilly schmucks and point and giggle that California has all the money in the USA.
They also love to to shit and giggle about how it's a lot more leftoids with college degrees, which they associate with having lots of money.
Fucking subhuman lying rats.
Because of two factors:
They USED to be more 'right wing' in that when they were started they were focused on capital gain and status above all until the old instructors retired and were replaced by the more commie leaning ideological replacements.
They're projecting again because they don't like to pin failure on their ideology.
Yeah, wasn'tacademia predmoinantly traditional Christian conservative right wing before the 1960s civil "rights" stuff?
You have to go further back than that, commie infiltration was happening pre WW2 if I remember right.
Right, that's why McCarthyism happened, because there was actual evidence of it happening and he wanted to stop it before it was too late.
It certainly accelerated after WW2, though. Incidentally, this is also when jew quotas were removed and jews sort of came out of the closet. So much is happening at that time that it can be hard to link cause and effect.
I haven't seen Saving Private Ryan, but apparently you can see from them calling a Drill sergeant a "jew bastard" at the beginning that anti-jew feeling was pretty open at the beginning of WW2. It was, anyways.
From then on the feelings about jews are more suppressed. Civil Rights was supposed to be about the blacks, but the same silencing of people's feeling about blacks was applied to their thoughts towards jews. Even though black and jew are not parallel concepts at all. "Black" cannot be a religion. And jew is a much narrower ethnic group than black. Worldwide, there are many black ethnic groups. Whether to consider American blacks as a monolithic ethnic group is a question.
Okay then, you should be in favor of heavily taxing these hedge funds and making sure universities can't exploit this loophole. After all, you want to tax the rich, right?
Exactly. We have to stop these evil fascist right-wing universities by taking their endowments!
tanks on harvard yard
Because there's 'left wing' and there's 'corporate left wing'. Corporate left wing is just Neolib+Neocon in a skinsuit. They use IDPOL to market, divide and conquer. They don't actually believe in the legend of noble Yasuke and defund the police. They don't celebrate St. Floyd outside of onerous lip service.
It's all a means to gain and retain power unfettered.
I would argue that not only are they not left wing, but they aren't right wing either. They are oligarch / kleptocracy. In the sense that they aren't collectives, I guess that would put it more toward the individual, which would lean right.
This particular spin to call them 'right wing' is to get all of the champagne commies on board with whatever message needs to be pushed.
They are oligarchs and global financial bandits. They've no real political position beyond power and legacy control to keep their kids in power. They are playing a completely different game than the majority of us. Same game they've been playing since Charles V vs Francis I. When the Hapsburgs started to really solidify power.
That's leftism in a nutshell, though.
A lot of people confuse modern cultural arguments or the two american parties as what "left wing" and "right wing" mean. Or they use that retarded political compass, or the horseshoe theory nonsense taught by useless faggot commies in public education. None of those are correct.
The only objective measurement of political ideologies is on a single axis, measuring scale of governments. The extreme ends of that axis are totalitarianism and anarchism.
Every leftist movement shares similar characteristics, and they all have the same parasite sociopath class that ends up ruling them.
If you throw out the concept of right wing and left wing in this argument and just say "owned by Jewish hedge funds and leans Jewish socially" it makes complete sense
Exactly, there is no real Right/Left divide; it's just Jews on both sides creating artificial conflict to distract everyone from their real enemies.
Look at how the "Right" act regarding "anti-semetism". Is it any different from how the "Left" acts regarding "trans-phobia"?
I remember my grandad used to go on about not wasting time on a degree you can't get a job with. He had a degree himself in a time when it was much less common. It was more so with my brother who would come up with some stupid shit like Egyptology. "You can't get a job with that, don't waste your time with that!"
We need more of that. It's really not, "If you just believe in yourself and try you can be successful doing anything."
People aren't taught how to utilize college properly. It's always 'Get degree, magic happens'. Which might have worked at one point, but the environment has changed, drastically, and people need to recognize this.
If there's one thing I could hammer into people nowadays that I had to learn the hard way - never, ever graduate college without having a job lined up and locked down. You should be using your last year taking 'easy' classes and wringing every last drop of advantage over the social network you've built up amongst all your college professors to get yourself a nice lock-in. This is critical. I'd go so far as to put off graduating if need be. It's that important.
It was never school for me, ever. They'd go on about follow your passion and such. It was actually grandfathers the most if I think about it, and it wasn't from being rich as they weren't. They were both involved in the small towns where they lived, so whenever I'd visit I'd inevitably end up at lunch at the cafe where they always went sitting around with a bunch of independent men with small businesses. There's a ton of osmosis for a kid in that environment, outside of the "ol yeah you should get your grandad to bring you by and I'll show you my <whatever it is they did for a living>."
Isn't Egyptology like... an actual field? Like Egypt's history is so deep that people spend their entire fucking lifetimes trying to figure it out because they had a long-standing culture worth studying.
It is a legit field but it's extremely tiny, so chances you'll be getting a job that leverages your degree after graduating are minimal.
It's not as fake as many, but I wasn't going to make up "women's studies" and include it in my story falsely. It's also pretty tough to be employed in, which was my point. Yeah, it can happen, but it's more likely to be the path to barista with a degree than not.
It's at very least a pyramid scheme. We graduate 100-200 history majors a year per university, and have 5,000 universities with history departments of 10-20 people. That's each university, every year. It's expected that the cream of the crop rise to the top, but we've churned so many out we wouldn't know good if it bit us. Heck, we might actually punish good.
The best part is we don't aim History majors at jobs outside of academia. The ability to research at that level would be amazing for businesses. This should be a great job making degree. No one is taught how to promote it or even apply outside of academia. Then if someone comes from the outside with research, we then say that person isn't good enough because they haven't worked in the pyramid scheme.
It's a perfect system to exploit if you knew how and wanted power or money.
The affixing of “pseudo-“ to any and all -ologists who haven’t prostrated themselves at the foot of the golden calf known as “the academy” (and the general public’s propensity to “trust the experts” and shut up) is truly one of the most damaging attitudes of our modern “enlightened” world
The same with Information/Information Sciences/Library Information Sciences. All of those degrees get pigeonholed in low-paying Ponzi schemes, where the younger grads get sucked into toxic, soul crushing organizations, while the people at the top make 6 figures for essentially glad handing politicians.
The soft sciences as well. I had a class on business anthropology and was told it was evil to even consider.
The people in charge of recognizing successful businesses to invest in are not the administrators in charge of hiring or professors developing curricula. Endowments can get fucking insane. Harvard's is about 10x Greenland's gdp.
"Right wing" covers a spectrum from David Duke to Mitt Romney for these people so it isn't really a useful metric.
Once you accept that Right and Left are two heads of the same ethnically consistent hydra, it starts to feel silly to see
Sure, I prefer the Republicans but I consider this to be like preferring the human-looking side of Two-Face's face. Somehow, when I see someone I disagree with, another person in my social class, of my race, in my town, I don't think "enemy".
I only think that about one type of people, and as it happens, it is increasingly borderline illegal to think that about them. If you see that person you disagree with, within your race, within your social class, within your home town, ask yourself:
Or, on the contrary, would it be encouraged, by the system that has enslaved everybody you know, to hate and blame that person?
So when you have to pay for your college tuition, you are paying right wing billionares?
Did they think that one through? Wait, I know the answer.
You can be brainwashed into being an extreme leftist/communist ... by right wing money?
I don't fucking think so.
It's just leftist wordplay. They're abusing your absolute definition of "Right-wing" (based on a person's political beliefs) and conflating it with a relative definition (based on where a person is politically compared to the leftist). They can therefore have all this cultural and institutional power supporting them, but because the power isn't as or more radical than they are, they're still an uwu smol bean oppressed minority downtrodden by le ebil Rightoids.
If they ever pull off their illegal loan forgiveness congress should take the billions out of these plush money laundering accounts they call "endowments".
Then remove their tax exempt status.
But we all know the GOP are a litter of yippy little purse dogs that roll onto their back and piss themselves at the least resistance.
Seeing as that's how they get their hands in the purse...