Dr. John Campbell: New RNA Vaccines Coming
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Well, we all suspected that this was coming. RNA injections becoming mainstream and standard, as promoted by a Mr. Bill Gates.
I never took the covid experimental mRNA injection. I was also already very hesitant to ever get another vaccine, ever since I saw that graph showing how essentially every disease that are claimed to have been eradicated by vaccines, were already far into their decline in number of cases before they were even distributed, merely due to an improvement in hygiene standards.
But now that they're going ahead with claiming that mRNA gene therapy is an equally-valid, if not superior, method of vaccination, I say "Fuck that." I refuse to inject myself with some strange substance developed by people I don't trust, who benefit from keeping me consistently ill and dependent on their products, whose safety is guaranteed by the governmental departments that are the most overrun with corruption and conflicts of interests of all, and whose short term, mid term, and long term consequences are unclear, because all serious research into those effects is censored, outlawed and exempt from funding.
[Illegal turd worlders have entered the chat]
The “partial efficacy vaccine” is the new depopulation push. They just got a malaria “vaccine” approved for mass implementation in Africa in ‘22, despite known severe side effects, the cherry on top? Less than 40% efficacy in lab trials, which means realistically it will be about 0% considering how quickly malaria mutates.
They have many ways to p-hack a vaccine efficacy-
With covid, the vaccinated arm had 6 deaths and the unvaccinated had 1 death. So they changed the endpoint to “did it prevent infection (as determined by pfizer’s dodgy process)”
But the simplest way they fake a reduction in infections- they don’t count you “as vaccinated” until you have the 2nd dose. So I guess 40% of the infected were in this window. Boom - 40% “effective”
I don't have any issue with mRNA technology in general, and think it should be explored. HOWEVER, they threw their credibility in the trash with "safe and effective". Now even if they follow 2019 protocols for proving safety and efficacy I will not believe them. So no, I'm not taking your shit, and I don't have a concept for how you can get your credibility back.
mRNA is a great idea for individualized treatment for deadly cancers.
They take your cancer, make an rna that shows your immune system how to identify all the cancer cells, and shoot up your arm with it.
Myocarditis or deadly cancer... no brainer. Myocarditis or the common cold... also an opposite no brainer.
I'm not a doctor myself, so I might be wrong, but from my current understanding, the myocarditis is not a standard feature of mRNA technology. It was a clear and real concern for the covid injections, because afaik, they relied on the theory that the main part required to immunize a person to the virus was to make the body defend itself against the spike protein. And the way they were doing it was by introducing a mRNA that informed cells in the body to create those spike proteins themselves, with the expectation that the body would recognize them as hostile and attack them.
Of course, it failed. The injection spread much farther than intended in the body, invaded the blood stream, the spike protein caused more damage than intended, and formed long, rubbery-like growths that caused blockages, causing heart attacks.
That's roughly how I understood it, anyway. If you use mRNA specifically to target a cancer, then I don't believe that it would cause the same side effects as the covid injections had. I don't think that myocarditis is a standard reaction to the technology, I think that it was something specific to this one case.
I still would never trust it as a "vaccine" intended as a "one-size fits all" approach, though. The technology only seems promising when it has an extremely specific purpose, for a very specific case.
There's a lot of things that may have been going wrong.
IE, the vaccine was supposed to be injected into muscle and "stay there". Except medical standard practice of aspirating to ensure they weren't injecting into a vein was abandoned for convenience purposes.
Vaccine storage was rumored to be haphazard. Part of this of course was due to the scale and logistics involved, but it was a multi-layered level of incompetence.
Another problem I think was that there really wasn't a lot of investigation into how physical activity in patients shortly after vaccination might increase risks in a few ways. Possibly increasing the risk of spread from the muscle to the blood, spread of spike proteins, and obviously the potential strain on the cardiovascular system when it's in a somewhat risky state.
And yes, the self-replication part as a whole is a bit iffy. More-so since they built the entire fucking thing off of the spike protein, even though supposedly it's the spike protein that does a lot of the damage.
Just so many stupid mistakes and minimal oversight. Zero responsibility. A total fuck up that's been covered up and buried to high heaven.
it's a neat idea that is in no way ready for mass use.
Depends on what you want to use it for. Seems to work great for government and pharma company purposes.
Exactly. One of the main issues with the covid vaccines was the entire combination of conditions.
A virus that is remarkably virulent and damaging as well as difficult to produce a vaccine for in the first place, combined with experimental technology that hasn't been "field tested" like this before, rushed really fast, distributed on a global scale with poor quality control and improper storage methods, shitty policy, cover ups, etc etc etc.
And after that shitshow, and given how much money was made without them bearing any consequences for their recklessness, I have no trust in anything they come up with, even though the mRNA technology itself isn't necessarily an issue.
man, youtube still puts these little covid "official news" messages on videos related to the topic? it's been five years, let it go
I'm looking forward to not taking these "vaccines" as well.
Bill Gates gaslighting people again. The CoViD jabs didn't work ( well, they increased overall mortality, it worked for depopulation ).
I’ve got no problem with the mRNA technique in theory so long as all these new vaccines go through rigorous testing of, say 5-10 years!!!
Until then - hell no!
But line must go up sooner than 5 to 10 years.
I'm thinking someone oughtta reverse engineer this technology to make super PED's.....then put every head they can find at the WEF into a wall, then the police, then the army, etc.
Fuck you "Big Pharma Shill Faggot Cock Sucker" Dr Campbell
Are you accusing Dr. John Campbell of being a shill for big pharma? Because if so, then I think that you are misguided. He has been extremely critical of them for several years, now. He's just prone to making understatements, because he's very familiar with youtube censorship policies, so he avoids a lot of issues by letting videos he shares speak for themselves.