Less than 40% efficacy in lab trials, which means realistically it will be about 0% considering how quickly malaria mutates.
They have many ways to p-hack a vaccine efficacy-
With covid, the vaccinated arm had 6 deaths and the unvaccinated had 1 death. So they changed the endpoint to “did it prevent infection (as determined by pfizer’s dodgy process)”
But the simplest way they fake a reduction in infections- they don’t count you “as vaccinated” until you have the 2nd dose. So I guess 40% of the infected were in this window. Boom - 40% “effective”
this. if you pull the pfizer clinical, it reeks of p-hacking and outright data fraud.
for example, when practically every sickness was being labeled as covid because of PCR junk science that even the creator of the test disavowed, the only way to lower covid rates on one side was to literally block them from testing. so if you got sick and were in the control, they'd tell you to come in for a covid test right when the lab opens. but if you got sick and were in the jab group, they would tell you to come in shortly before the place closed, and many flat out didn't make it in time, artificially lowering the covid rates in the jab group. now this came from whistleblowers.
what about shit pfizer openly admits to?
pfizer openly disclosed that the jab group had over 5x more people removed post-injection than the control group. pfizer basically just said "these people don't count anymore" and gave no reason why. not death or protocol deviations. those were categorized. this was a new category that pfizer just decided not to count anymore. and if even a quarter of them had covid (because practically everyone got covid), the entire clinical would have failed. picking and choosing to exclude 5x more in the test group is classic, textbook p-hacking. they got the result they wanted by literally not counting people who would have debunked their shitty clinical.
They have many ways to p-hack a vaccine efficacy-
With covid, the vaccinated arm had 6 deaths and the unvaccinated had 1 death. So they changed the endpoint to “did it prevent infection (as determined by pfizer’s dodgy process)”
But the simplest way they fake a reduction in infections- they don’t count you “as vaccinated” until you have the 2nd dose. So I guess 40% of the infected were in this window. Boom - 40% “effective”
this. if you pull the pfizer clinical, it reeks of p-hacking and outright data fraud.
for example, when practically every sickness was being labeled as covid because of PCR junk science that even the creator of the test disavowed, the only way to lower covid rates on one side was to literally block them from testing. so if you got sick and were in the control, they'd tell you to come in for a covid test right when the lab opens. but if you got sick and were in the jab group, they would tell you to come in shortly before the place closed, and many flat out didn't make it in time, artificially lowering the covid rates in the jab group. now this came from whistleblowers.
what about shit pfizer openly admits to?
pfizer openly disclosed that the jab group had over 5x more people removed post-injection than the control group. pfizer basically just said "these people don't count anymore" and gave no reason why. not death or protocol deviations. those were categorized. this was a new category that pfizer just decided not to count anymore. and if even a quarter of them had covid (because practically everyone got covid), the entire clinical would have failed. picking and choosing to exclude 5x more in the test group is classic, textbook p-hacking. they got the result they wanted by literally not counting people who would have debunked their shitty clinical.