Dr. John Campbell: New RNA Vaccines Coming
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
I don't have any issue with mRNA technology in general, and think it should be explored. HOWEVER, they threw their credibility in the trash with "safe and effective". Now even if they follow 2019 protocols for proving safety and efficacy I will not believe them. So no, I'm not taking your shit, and I don't have a concept for how you can get your credibility back.
mRNA is a great idea for individualized treatment for deadly cancers.
They take your cancer, make an rna that shows your immune system how to identify all the cancer cells, and shoot up your arm with it.
Myocarditis or deadly cancer... no brainer. Myocarditis or the common cold... also an opposite no brainer.
I'm not a doctor myself, so I might be wrong, but from my current understanding, the myocarditis is not a standard feature of mRNA technology. It was a clear and real concern for the covid injections, because afaik, they relied on the theory that the main part required to immunize a person to the virus was to make the body defend itself against the spike protein. And the way they were doing it was by introducing a mRNA that informed cells in the body to create those spike proteins themselves, with the expectation that the body would recognize them as hostile and attack them.
Of course, it failed. The injection spread much farther than intended in the body, invaded the blood stream, the spike protein caused more damage than intended, and formed long, rubbery-like growths that caused blockages, causing heart attacks.
That's roughly how I understood it, anyway. If you use mRNA specifically to target a cancer, then I don't believe that it would cause the same side effects as the covid injections had. I don't think that myocarditis is a standard reaction to the technology, I think that it was something specific to this one case.
I still would never trust it as a "vaccine" intended as a "one-size fits all" approach, though. The technology only seems promising when it has an extremely specific purpose, for a very specific case.
There's a lot of things that may have been going wrong.
IE, the vaccine was supposed to be injected into muscle and "stay there". Except medical standard practice of aspirating to ensure they weren't injecting into a vein was abandoned for convenience purposes.
Vaccine storage was rumored to be haphazard. Part of this of course was due to the scale and logistics involved, but it was a multi-layered level of incompetence.
Another problem I think was that there really wasn't a lot of investigation into how physical activity in patients shortly after vaccination might increase risks in a few ways. Possibly increasing the risk of spread from the muscle to the blood, spread of spike proteins, and obviously the potential strain on the cardiovascular system when it's in a somewhat risky state.
And yes, the self-replication part as a whole is a bit iffy. More-so since they built the entire fucking thing off of the spike protein, even though supposedly it's the spike protein that does a lot of the damage.
Just so many stupid mistakes and minimal oversight. Zero responsibility. A total fuck up that's been covered up and buried to high heaven.
it's a neat idea that is in no way ready for mass use.
Depends on what you want to use it for. Seems to work great for government and pharma company purposes.
Exactly. One of the main issues with the covid vaccines was the entire combination of conditions.
A virus that is remarkably virulent and damaging as well as difficult to produce a vaccine for in the first place, combined with experimental technology that hasn't been "field tested" like this before, rushed really fast, distributed on a global scale with poor quality control and improper storage methods, shitty policy, cover ups, etc etc etc.
And after that shitshow, and given how much money was made without them bearing any consequences for their recklessness, I have no trust in anything they come up with, even though the mRNA technology itself isn't necessarily an issue.