Lauren Southern probably wants to be a stay at home mom and is thinking, what if I had to get divorced and didn't have any money or connections.
What she should be saying is "what if I was a narcissistic bitch that wanted to manufacture dirt and threaten to ruin my ex husband to squeeze more money out of him because fuck men?" and then "oh wait I'm not a narcissistic psycho bitch".
Or maybe she is, I don't pay much attention to her.
Child support is rarely used on anything but the mother and her desires. Its lax enforcement of use is proof that women should not receive it and should in fact be left destitute and without her children if they leave their husbands.
upon divorce, that should be annualized and each parent should be responsible for half of that. no more.
Nah fuck that. If you want custody you have to be ready to raise that child, period. If you can't afford to do so, then you can't afford to be a single parent and should work that shit out before you walk out the door.
Child support is almost an entirely woman focused program and they don't deserve a penny from it until they have to submit itemized receipts for every purchase made with it to show its only for the children and their needs.
“Conservative” women are just yesterday’s rad fems. Nearly zero of them support any actual form of sex/gender equality. The disingenuous bs of the “she’s spending all that on lawyers” is also a lie because crowders estate is funding her lawyers which is specifically outlined and Texas law. “No fault” divorce is a money racket for women to run off with men’s kids and then send them a bill for it. You want the divorce? Then you get to make your own way, that’s the cost of the freedom.
Now they're trying to claim she contributed to the success of LWC. Like I've watched LWC on /off for years since NGJ was on in fact. I don't even remember seeing her.
It's a shame really because I thought Sydney Watson was one of the okay ones.
Why because she has a modicum of a sense of humor and is OK to look at? I don't see how you could say that if you actually knew about her Blaze lawsuit
There are no "Conservative Women." There are women who do what their Fathers or Husbands impart onto them and women from broken homes making retarded decisions and ruining society. There is no middle ground.
She is a woman, that puts her above petty things like "the law" or "societal expectations". If it were brought to a tax court case, they'd likely actually just rule it as "as a woman, we can't rule against her" and close the case. The biases in courts towards women, civil and criminal, are three times greater than the next closest bias (racial).
prevent herself from becoming homeless and having her children
If there's little to no evidence of Crowder being abusive, she deserves to be homeless. You don't walk away from family obligations, unless the husband has been inflicting documented physical harm. Excessive psychological abuse maybe, but that should be proven too. Too many women just walk away because they can't handle a little stress or flee like rats if their husband loses his reputation.
And also I see every woman do this "her children" bullshit. She popped out the babies so the children are supposedly her property. Same logic as the anti-life abortionists. Doesn't matter that she needed a man to inseminate her.
...if their husband is extremely wealthy?
Is Crowder upper-class wealthy or middle-class wealthy? Because there's a difference, and believe me, there are poor fucks who consider middle-class to be wealthy.
The community note points out that the $25k is not technically child support but some kind of lawsuit that Louder With Crowder is paying her until the divorce is finalized. Mostly inconsequential just pointing out 25k is not the actual child support ruling.
it's intentionally programmed into us from a very early age.
also Lauren is a used up leather handbag trailer tramp with a big mouth a no brain. I immediately lose respect for anyone that actually listens "conservative women". if a woman says she is conservative the first thing you should ask is what she thinks about women voting or holding political office. because they shouldn't.
Part of that is why when people go omg, crowder is so horrible he wants to have FULL custody of his children, I'm like yeah...have you seen the fucking nutjobs that trans their children after divorcing their dads? And from the text released, hillary is THAT kind of nutjob
Lack of accountability is the main reason. Everything is always something or someone else's fault to a women. Their own actions can NEVER be the cause, ever. I work in a field that is mostly male (for obvious reasons) and every female coworker has fit this mentality to a tee.
Not that women should be in positions of power regardless, but I think this is in some part a Western cultural artifact born of feminism and the consequent deterioration of cultural mechanisms to keep women accountable. You can even see it in stories as you go back through the decades: the older the story, the harder it seems to come down on women making bad choices.
Because women overwhelmingly vote Democrat and love gimmie handouts.
They are naturally inclined to be resource hoarders, they are the gatherer in the Hunter/Gatherer paradigm that humanity went through in history.
Women shouldn't have jobs unless absolutely necessary as well, because as resource hoarders, no matter how much they have they will always look for men who have even more than they do. This has created the issue in Western society where a bunch of girl bosses go to college and get a degree and now make 100k a year and won't settle for any man who makes less than that by a cent.
Women are not natural leaders. They inherently care for only themselves and maybe their offspring, but given the abortion rates in modern society I'm inclined to believe that the self is still paramount.
Women are emotional children their entire lives. Sure they "mature" faster, meaning the reach their peak maturity earlier than men, but men can actually gain emotional control and almost no women can. They are ruled by their vagina
Marriage only works when there are consequences for both parties. What we have right now are indentured slave contracts, that can even be oral to become binding.
You are one blowjob from the ruination of your life.
What the fuck is Lauren Southern smoking?
I keep underestimating women's crazy in-group bias.
Reminds me of the time I tried to discuss a study on job discrimination with a woman I consider ''reasonable''.
Abstract ''result'' : ''Ugly women are treated worse than pretty women! Mysoginy!''
Actual results : Ugly men, handsome men, and ugly women are treated the same, but pretty women get treated better than everyone else.
The woman STILL says that it's unfair for women because discrimination against women.
They see the preferential treatment pretty women get, and establish this as a baseline under which everything is ''mysoginy''.
Like you said, it’s that sweet in group bias and it gets reinforced by men wanting to be nice
Lauren Southern probably wants to be a stay at home mom and is thinking, what if I had to get divorced and didn't have any money or connections.
What she should be saying is "what if I was a narcissistic bitch that wanted to manufacture dirt and threaten to ruin my ex husband to squeeze more money out of him because fuck men?" and then "oh wait I'm not a narcissistic psycho bitch".
Or maybe she is, I don't pay much attention to her.
The same thing happened to me except the topic was the wage gap myth.
She wouldn't even look at data that countered her opinion.
I called her out for acting like a child and oh boy did that make her mad lol
Child support is rarely used on anything but the mother and her desires. Its lax enforcement of use is proof that women should not receive it and should in fact be left destitute and without her children if they leave their husbands.
Nah fuck that. If you want custody you have to be ready to raise that child, period. If you can't afford to do so, then you can't afford to be a single parent and should work that shit out before you walk out the door.
Child support is almost an entirely woman focused program and they don't deserve a penny from it until they have to submit itemized receipts for every purchase made with it to show its only for the children and their needs.
“Conservative” women are just yesterday’s rad fems. Nearly zero of them support any actual form of sex/gender equality. The disingenuous bs of the “she’s spending all that on lawyers” is also a lie because crowders estate is funding her lawyers which is specifically outlined and Texas law. “No fault” divorce is a money racket for women to run off with men’s kids and then send them a bill for it. You want the divorce? Then you get to make your own way, that’s the cost of the freedom.
Now they're trying to claim she contributed to the success of LWC. Like I've watched LWC on /off for years since NGJ was on in fact. I don't even remember seeing her.
"equality" is fake and gay
Men and women are asymmetric with different strengths and weaknesses.
Tough, but fair.
Lmao. I doubt this is what you meant but it would be funny if Tim was the one drawn and quartered because of the beanie
https://ibb.co/album/7ttf5S
https://twitter.com/Lauren_Southern/status/1773011150441230814
https://twitter.com/SydneyLWatson/status/1772660569964691567
https://twitter.com/abbythelibb_/status/1772617393203790099
https://twitter.com/nosoup4knowles/status/1773006775043694968
Also, pretty much any semi redpilled man has just gone 'yeah, that sounds about right. I expected this'
Why because she has a modicum of a sense of humor and is OK to look at? I don't see how you could say that if you actually knew about her Blaze lawsuit
Lol you have a shit judge of people if you thought Sydney Watson was okay. She's one of the biggest grifters around
There are no "Conservative Women." There are women who do what their Fathers or Husbands impart onto them and women from broken homes making retarded decisions and ruining society. There is no middle ground.
$25,000.00 per month. some funds.
If she's having a hard time living with that amount, the problem isn't the funds received. It's her.
300k per year. I wonder how that money is taxed.
Tax free. Or rather crowder pays the tax on it
She should be required to file it as income
She is a woman, that puts her above petty things like "the law" or "societal expectations". If it were brought to a tax court case, they'd likely actually just rule it as "as a woman, we can't rule against her" and close the case. The biases in courts towards women, civil and criminal, are three times greater than the next closest bias (racial).
"SUMMARY JUDGEMENT! Not Guilty!" (you got Engoron-ed)
If there's little to no evidence of Crowder being abusive, she deserves to be homeless. You don't walk away from family obligations, unless the husband has been inflicting documented physical harm. Excessive psychological abuse maybe, but that should be proven too. Too many women just walk away because they can't handle a little stress or flee like rats if their husband loses his reputation.
And also I see every woman do this "her children" bullshit. She popped out the babies so the children are supposedly her property. Same logic as the anti-life abortionists. Doesn't matter that she needed a man to inseminate her.
Is Crowder upper-class wealthy or middle-class wealthy? Because there's a difference, and believe me, there are poor fucks who consider middle-class to be wealthy.
Eh, some women need a slap here or there, mostly because their parents never did it when they were younger
That's why I put qualifiers. There's a difference between a slapping your wife and beating your wife.
Fair enough
The community note points out that the $25k is not technically child support but some kind of lawsuit that Louder With Crowder is paying her until the divorce is finalized. Mostly inconsequential just pointing out 25k is not the actual child support ruling.
Its an interim judgement and not finalised because they're still arguing about the final amount but its pretty much still alimony/childsupport
Which tribe has the strongest in-group bias: women, Muslims, or Jews?
I think it's a tie with all three being 10/10 on that scale.
Add in pajeets, cambodians and... well, anyone non-white
some men have a very idealised version of marriage and women
it's intentionally programmed into us from a very early age.
also Lauren is a used up leather handbag trailer tramp with a big mouth a no brain. I immediately lose respect for anyone that actually listens "conservative women". if a woman says she is conservative the first thing you should ask is what she thinks about women voting or holding political office. because they shouldn't.
Why shouldn’t they?
Part of that is why when people go omg, crowder is so horrible he wants to have FULL custody of his children, I'm like yeah...have you seen the fucking nutjobs that trans their children after divorcing their dads? And from the text released, hillary is THAT kind of nutjob
Not that women should be in positions of power regardless, but I think this is in some part a Western cultural artifact born of feminism and the consequent deterioration of cultural mechanisms to keep women accountable. You can even see it in stories as you go back through the decades: the older the story, the harder it seems to come down on women making bad choices.
Who was the guy that said “when I write women I first write a man, then remove all logic and accountability”?
It’s hitting extra hard in today’s world
Because women overwhelmingly vote Democrat and love gimmie handouts.
They are naturally inclined to be resource hoarders, they are the gatherer in the Hunter/Gatherer paradigm that humanity went through in history.
Women shouldn't have jobs unless absolutely necessary as well, because as resource hoarders, no matter how much they have they will always look for men who have even more than they do. This has created the issue in Western society where a bunch of girl bosses go to college and get a degree and now make 100k a year and won't settle for any man who makes less than that by a cent.
Women are not natural leaders. They inherently care for only themselves and maybe their offspring, but given the abortion rates in modern society I'm inclined to believe that the self is still paramount.
Women are emotional children their entire lives. Sure they "mature" faster, meaning the reach their peak maturity earlier than men, but men can actually gain emotional control and almost no women can. They are ruled by their vagina
Marriage only works when there are consequences for both parties. What we have right now are indentured slave contracts, that can even be oral to become binding.
You are one blowjob from the ruination of your life.
Wise up.