She is a woman, that puts her above petty things like "the law" or "societal expectations". If it were brought to a tax court case, they'd likely actually just rule it as "as a woman, we can't rule against her" and close the case. The biases in courts towards women, civil and criminal, are three times greater than the next closest bias (racial).
$25,000.00 per month. some funds.
If she's having a hard time living with that amount, the problem isn't the funds received. It's her.
300k per year. I wonder how that money is taxed.
Tax free. Or rather crowder pays the tax on it
She should be required to file it as income
She is a woman, that puts her above petty things like "the law" or "societal expectations". If it were brought to a tax court case, they'd likely actually just rule it as "as a woman, we can't rule against her" and close the case. The biases in courts towards women, civil and criminal, are three times greater than the next closest bias (racial).