Australia had literal concentration camps for the purebloods during the lockdowns. They literally arrested you if you refused to leave your house to go there "voluntarily". Canada is bad, but never was anywhere near as bad as Australia.
It might still be bad in the cities, but sentiments are shifting rapidly in rural and blue collar areas. There was a lot of open bitching and moaning about pride from random normie boomers this year.
The Canadian Flag is a bizarre antigovernment symbol. One hanging from a bridge is now a symbol of open contempt for the prime minister. I see this frequently on 400 series highways. Occasionally paired with anti-WEF messaging.
Still a long way from fixing itself, but something is happening here.
if you're a native, they want you to kill yourself.
Are you referring to First Nations when you say 'native?' Natives in Canada get extraordinary benefits.
For those who aren't aware, officially recognized Natives in Canada pay no taxes on anything, pay no tuition to attend any postsecondary college or university, priority access to healthcare, can hold commercial licenses unavailable to other Canadians (e.g., some casino licenses), have preferential placement in law schools and medical schools, and face preferential hiring policies in all public and virtually all private occupations. They also often receive class-action lawsuit settlement payments from the Government of Canada because their ancestors allegedly faced so much horror that they can relitigate the same case over and over and keep giving Natives hundreds of millions of dollars.
Not your point, but we're actually getting an incessant influx of Indians more than anyone else. I think the South Asian population in Canada increased from <1 million in 2010 to > 3 million now. Cities like Brampton are majority South Asian now, and the city has become an absurdly busy mega-dump.
Why would anyone be surprised? India is a filthy, overcrowded shithole, and immigrants from there will just bring the same attributes that make that country so awful to the west.
I feel zero sympathy for post-colonial countries. It's entirely the fault of their citizens that they are so awful. Look at countries like Japan and Korea to see what all these other rat nests could have done with the last 75 years.
There were quarantine facilities that infected people were taken to and I think they even rounded up some Australian Aboriginals in some states, both of which are terrible, but to my knowledge they never locked up unvaccinated people specifically.
They just treated them like second class citizens and froze them out of every aspect of life using vaccine passes.
It seems that was a facility for quarantining returning travelers and infected people from a nearby town.
I'm not excusing that. It's horrible. But unvaccinated people weren't rounded up and imprisoned.
It probably came close to that, however. Like I said, they were frozen out of every aspect of life using vax passes. The rhetoric from major politicians got very bad. I can still remember how scared and angry my Australian friend was at the height of it, and I'm still infuriated on his behalf.
(Edit: I'm sorry, that apparently did happen with one Aboriginal guy. Which makes it technically true to an extent but it's almost more to do with the Aboriginal communities being treated awfully in that state. I guess if you're both Aboriginal and unvaccinated you get it twice as bad.)
The official statement was that it was only quarantine. But even back then, there were multiple accounts and videos of people being visited by police and ordered to be sent there, forced to vacate their houses. Not only at this one location.
I recall reading about how a very similar facility was being built in Canada, in one of the Western provinces. I don't remember if it was British Columbia, Alberta or Manitoba, but around there. Fortunately, the trucker convoy happened before it was completed.
I actually got told those were a good thing because there was too many complaints of abuse regarding the hotels.
WHAT DO YOU THINK IS GOING TO HAPPEN WHEN YOU TRAP PEOPLE BEHIND TWO FENCES OF CONCERTINA WIRE???
The huge scandal that broke the whole quarantine stuff up is when they raided an "aboriginal" village and tried to drag him to a quarantine camp because he hadn't gotten the covid jab, because they needed to protect the village.
tried to drag him to a quarantine camp because he hadn't gotten the covid jab
Oh, that did actually happen? It's still not 'unvaccinated' writ large but yeah, I hear that state (territory?) is racist as FUCK to those Aboriginal people. Actual racism, I mean. Extremely condescending, bureaucratic, 'it's for your own good' racism. I was really surprised to hear about some of the stuff that goes on there, to be honest.
This is why I removed myself from the organ transplant registry here in Canada. I refuse to support a system that's deemed me a second class citizen. I know of two cases like this here, one of which left 5 young kids without a father. Our Supreme Court won't even hear another woman's similar case.
I'd remove my tax support from the system entirely, and put it towards private health insurance instead, but that's not an option in Castreau Jr's Canada. Instead, I get to continue funding a system that thinks I'm better off dead. I'm sure they'd offer me MAID, in fact, if I ever needed a transplant.
They'll use the excuse of triage, of course. They're prioritizing patients that are willing to do what's necessary to stay healthy. They'll continue to ignore the overwhelming evidence that the covid vaccines have done more harm than good. They'll stick to their guns. The same guns they're more than happy to point at your head and pull the trigger. Compassionately.
This is why I removed myself from the organ transplant registry here in Canada.
I might consider that too, and it's not even that bad (yet) in USA. Hell, maybe the only reason it's not that bad yet is because they are intentionally using your countries as guinea pigs to see how they handle such a situation.
Here in the U.S., transplants are now prioritized by "equity" rules in a lot of hospitals. This has led to a couple of cases where a poor, deserving "youth" got a heart/lung/kidney and then got shot by an.. opposing group of youths or the police.
You haven’t been driven to hate, you’ve just had your eyes opened is all.
Doctors have always been evil.
In ancient Egypt and Greece they drilled holes into people’s heads to supposedly treat all sorts of ailments. In the Middle Ages they promoted blood letting and the use of leeches, maggots and all sorts of other wonderful things (wonder what caused all those plagues). In Victorian London the poor and destitute often ended up on operating tables, restrained with belts while some “doctor” prodded and sliced away with his contemporaries watching and taking notes from the theatre seats above. In the latter half of the 19th century they sold cocaine and arsenic as miracle cures. In WW1 they giddily roamed the battlefields with bone saws, and in WW2 the quickest profession to join the Nazi party were doctors.
I will never understand our society’s inexplicable love and reverence for these assholes, ESPECIALLY after 2020 and the jabs. At best they’re gullible fools, and at worst they’re the most evil profession in recorded human history, with more blood on their hands than even the worst dictators.
Even the “good” ones who start out with the noblest of intentions end up becoming blunt, uncaring narcissistic assholes. Guess that’s what playing God all day with other people’s lives does to you 🤷🏼‍♂️
This kind of behaviour is totally in character as far as I’m concerned. I can totally see them letting an innocent child die without a transplant just to prove their point. The medical industry is vile.
People thought highly of them because for about half your examples, that was them trying to do something with shit that worked for reasons they didn't understand but it vaguely did something positive.
Maggots and leeches are still used today because, while disgusting to look at, it does work for its intended purpose.
I agree with a lot of what you are getting at, but I can't begrudge people centuries ago for simply being ignorant of shit they couldn't possibly understand like germs and illnesses but still trying to do something. Because the alternative usually was just to sit down and die anyway.
I don’t fault them for not knowing any better, that’s a good point actually.
It’s the fucking God complex they all have, the fact that they did all of those terrible things NOT knowing whether any of it actually worked but believing so because that’s what the scientific consensus of the day told them. It mirrors what’s happening today with the jabs. It’s one thing to be ignorant, but to also wield that ignorance like some god given authority and actually put people’s lives in jeopardy (like this poor child’s) is abhorrent.
I guess I shouldn’t paint everyone with the same brush because there are CERTAINLY good people like Malone, McCullough and others who put their necks on the chopping block.
I just have an unshakable distrust of the entire Industry now that I don’t think is ever gonna go away
I don't fault you for that, I feel much the same for many of them both today and in the past century.
I just also know that much of the stuff that looks primitive, evil, and horrifying to us now was basically the only way we could progress at all at the time and for many people the only "cure" they could manage even if it was just placebo doing its thing.
Though personally, I've had mostly on the level interactions with most actual medical doctors (instead of just doctorate doctors) and the God Complexes are all the nurses that surround them acting like they are personally saving the world each day as they wipe shit out of an old man's leg hairs.
I am informed that in Australia, unvaccinated people only recently regained the right to visit loved ones in nursing homes. Technically, they were apparently allowed to visit but had to do so outdoors or at windows.
Sadly, many of these policies are held over not because of active discrimination, but because of the unrelenting evil of an incompetent bureaucracy that thinks itself infallible.
This policy will change in time, but probably too late to save this young girl from either dying or having to inject herself with poison. In the meantime, nobody unvaccinated in Australia (or anywhere else with this disgusting policy) should even consider donating organs except to loved ones. Why would you give to a system that deems you unworthy of receiving?
If u have a brain you don't put your old family in nursing homes to be abused and neglected. Just like you don't put your kids in public schools to be attacked by niggers and taught by leftists to mutilate themselves.
They are literally making us stronger by forcing us out of these institutions.
It's not always that simple, but even if it was, I have an immense amount of sympathy for people who were denied visitation to loved ones as a result of covid tyranny. Especially dying loved ones.
Apparently the policy, before it was dropped (again, very recently) said 'End of life visits may be allowed'.
It is that simple. Nursing homes are not good places. If you love your parents you take care of them. If they are too proud to accept your care than that's their problem. If you leave them in a nursing home they will be neglected 90% of the time.
It really isn't that simple, especially when dementia is involved. Sometimes care at home just isn't sufficient. Sometimes it's too much to handle, no matter how much you love someone. Sometimes there are other reasons it's not feasible.
Nursing homes aren't bad everywhere. But if you do have a loved one in a nursing home you have to make absolutely sure they're getting decent care.
Truth. I had a Canadian co-worker stay in my spare bedroom for a couple weeks while she was down here getting knee ACL reconstruction surgery. At the time ( ~5 years ago) O Canada wanted her to hobble around on crutches for 18 months.
Medical tourism is going to be even more of a growth sector if they keep up with this nonsense. Buy a few second tier cruise ships, retrofit and staff.
From Reason and Violence, R.D. Laing & D.G. Cooper, 1964:
The survival group is first a practical invention in each of the permanence of a common unity through each other. It is freedom wishing to become inert, praxis seeking a way of metamorphosing itself into exis [a way out]. When a multiplicity of freedoms makes common praxis in order to find a basis of the permanence of the group, it produces by itself a form of reciprocity mediated by its own inertia. This new form of reciprocity Sartre calls the pledge. The pledge takes different forms. The historical act is not the necessary form of the pledge. It can be seen as the resistance of the survival group against separationist action, whether of going away or differentiation; as guarantee of the future through a lack of change produced in the group by freedom. Paradoxically, as provision of stability, as promise of permanence, and so forth, it affords the basis of all separation and differentiation. The pledge, however, is not a social contract, in Rousseau's sense, but the necessary passage from an immediate form of the group in danger of dissolution to another more reflective permanent form.
The pledge, as an invention of praxis, is the affirmation by the thirds of the permanence of the group as negation of its permanent possibility of negation through the multiplicity of alterity [the state of being different]. The threat to the permanence of the group is, of course, not necessarily the physical extermination of its members. By the pledge the group seeks to make itself its own instrument against seriality, which threatens it with dissolution.
The pledge is not a subjective determination. It is a real modification of the group by my regulative action. It is my guarantee to the others that it is impossible for serial alterity to be introduced into the group through me. This guarantee cannot, however, annul the permanent possibility that I can 'freely', that is, by my individual praxis, abandon my post, go over to the enemy. Treason and desertion can never be annulled as possibilities, but I have sworn my loyalty, I have given my pledge as guarantee against this exercise of my own freedom. I seek to utilize my own and everyone else's presence in the group as a third, as regulator, as my common-being, as a fact that cannot be transcended. I seek to convert my free being-in-the-group into an exigency that there is no way through or round, by the invention, as far as it is possible, of an inorganic, non-dialectical, rigid future. This rigid substantiation of my future is endowed with the triple characteristics of being the exigence, container, and ground of all my subsequent praxis. But there is no new dialectic.
Now, thus far two developments of the group-in-fusion have been distinguished for clarity—survival group and pledged group. We must now consider more closely the intelligibility of the pledge. The individual and the group praxis of the group-in-fusion have been seen to be comprehensible. Is the re-invention of the pledge in defined circumstances a process that is dialectical and comprehendible?
The pledge becomes intelligible as the common action of the group on itself. We said above that the group undergoes a transformation in and through the common action of the pledge. How then does the unity of the group-in-fusion compare with that of the pledge group? The former is a fusion in the face of material danger. In this fusion, real work is done. In the pledge group, on the other hand, nothing material binds the members, the danger is not real, it is only possible. The origin of the pledge is anxiety. Once the real menace from outside has passed, the danger to the permanence of the group is from dispersion and seriality. A reflexive fear arises.
There is not enough to fear to keep the group together now that the danger seems remote. The condition of the permanence of the group is thus the negation of the absence of fear. Fear must be reinvented. The fundamental reinvention, at the heart of the pledge, is the project of substituting a real fear, produced by the group itself, for the external fear that is becoming remote, and whose very remoteness is suspected as deceptive. And this fear as free product and corrective action of the group against serial dissolution is terror induced by the violence of common freedom. Terror is the reign in the group of absolute violence on its members.
The essential basis for this transformation is the risk of death that each runs at the heart of the group as possible agent of dispersion. The pledge group is a common product of reciprocities mediated under the statute of violence. Through this form of unification, the being-in-the-group becomes a limit that can be breached only with the certitude of dying.[REMEMBER THIS WHEN READING THE LAST PARAGRAPH OF THE PASSAGE BELOW]
Traced back to original praxis, man is in the position of absolute power of man over man. But in the vicissitudes of alienation, God can be substituted for the guillotine. The pledge, the oath of loyalty, backed up by violence, is the original free attempt to strike terror into each by each, in so far as it must constantly reactualize violence as the intelligible negation of individual freedom by common praxis.
This is the pledge. Its intelligibility is complete, since it is a question of a free transcendent of elements already given, towards an objective already posited. My pledge offers him and them a guarantee and invites violence as his and their right to suppress me if I default. By the same token the unmitigated pledge creates Terror, and invents treason, since there is now no excuse for defection. While the circumstances are not particularly constraining, I can remain on a level where violence-terror, loyalty-treachery, are not experienced in ultimate form. But the fundamental structure of the pledged group is violence-terror since I have freely consented to the possible liquidation of my person. My right over the other is my obligation to them, and contains in itself, implicitly, death as my possible destiny.
The initial reluctance to vaccinate evidently reflected a programmatic contradiction in Nazi health policy: the contrast between “racial hygiene” ideas that aimed at optimizing hereditary biology on the one hand; and a prevention policy on the other, which envisaged population and defense policy goals. More than ever, vaccination raised the question of how the “national body” should actually be understood and treated. Therefore, in the discussions since 1933, medical considerations have by no means been in the foreground. Rather, it was about the weighting of the needs of the "national comrade" compared to the requirements of the "national body" as well as threatening dangers from which the "national community" had to be protected. Answers to these questions seemed more urgent than ever “in view of the […] low risk of smallpox” 64 and the growing criticism of vaccination, as observed by the Reich Ministry of the Interior. Interior Minister Wilhelm Frick therefore assumed at the beginning of 1934 that a "revision of the vaccination law [...] would probably bring the conscience clause" 65. 66 This revision also makes sense because it takes “a far-reaching popular feeling into account” 67 so that previous measures against vaccination opponents “should be lifted as soon as possible” 68.
Such considerations formed the starting point of a commission in the Reich Ministry of the Interior, which worked on a revision of compulsory vaccination in March 1934. In this meeting, Johannes Breger from the Reich Health Office summed up the fundamental dilemma. If the motto used to be that possible damage to the individual was “the price” “with which the German people pay for their protection against smallpox” 69, then after the “seizure of power” one had to “check whether it corresponded to state ethics to demand such a sacrifice”. An examination is all the more urgent because "a large part of the German population rejects compulsory vaccination", as Ministerial Director Arthur Gütt from the Ministry of the Interior added. His colleague von Kapff took another step further, when he stylized the compulsory vaccination as a touchstone of the National Socialist world view: "Should the compulsory vaccination continue", "the majority of the people will doubt that in medical policy [...] National Socialist principles are decisive". Kapff received support from the President of the Dresden State Health Office, Weber, who saw “limited voluntariness” as a contemporary answer to the vaccination question. After all, “the conditions today are very different than they used to be. Thanks to the education of the National Socialist government, the people's views had changed so that more could be achieved voluntarily than previously with repeated forced vaccinations. Not all members of the commission could agree with this view. From Hamburg, Professor Paschen protested that the state was carelessly giving up its powers. Vaccination should “not be left to the discretion of the individual” but should “be enforced by law”.
The objection of the army medical inspector Anton Waldmann weighed more heavily. A personal decision of the "comrade" when vaccinating would contradict "the leader's principle" and thus increase the risk of epidemics "among the people", which "in the event of a future war forced upon us [...] would prevent the army from freedom of movement". At the end of the meeting, these military-political reasons led to the realization that there were still reservations about the abolition of compulsory vaccination. The commission therefore did not come to a conclusive conclusion, from which an important finding can be gained: in 1933 there was no concept ready for a main instrument of modern population policy. After the "seizure of power", an unusually open discussion was held about the modern precautionary measures70. The fact that the self-responsibility of the “national comrade” was an important argument, and that state coercion was even seen as a contradiction to National Socialist ethics, shows two things: the programmatic contradictions of health policy and the ambiguity about the legitimacy of state coercion vis-à -vis “national comrades”. One could summarize that vaccination mutated into a litmus test for the “consent dictatorship” 71 in the early phase of the “Third Reich”. After all, when it came to vaccinations, it was the “completely normal Germans” who one wanted to win for the “National Community”.
Moves Australia to 2nd place behind Canada in worst Western countries...
This is just evil, they've already killed innocent dogs for this shit, they don't deserve any power
Australia had literal concentration camps for the purebloods during the lockdowns. They literally arrested you if you refused to leave your house to go there "voluntarily". Canada is bad, but never was anywhere near as bad as Australia.
Canada is worse in other areas like how regardless if your pureblood or not, if you're a native, they want you to kill yourself.
On everything covid, Australia is worse but overall, Canada just manages to take the title.
Canada is changing rapidly.
It might still be bad in the cities, but sentiments are shifting rapidly in rural and blue collar areas. There was a lot of open bitching and moaning about pride from random normie boomers this year.
The Canadian Flag is a bizarre antigovernment symbol. One hanging from a bridge is now a symbol of open contempt for the prime minister. I see this frequently on 400 series highways. Occasionally paired with anti-WEF messaging.
Still a long way from fixing itself, but something is happening here.
Good thing western nations still have fair elections so that shifting sentiment can be reflected in government. /s
Are you referring to First Nations when you say 'native?' Natives in Canada get extraordinary benefits.
For those who aren't aware, officially recognized Natives in Canada pay no taxes on anything, pay no tuition to attend any postsecondary college or university, priority access to healthcare, can hold commercial licenses unavailable to other Canadians (e.g., some casino licenses), have preferential placement in law schools and medical schools, and face preferential hiring policies in all public and virtually all private occupations. They also often receive class-action lawsuit settlement payments from the Government of Canada because their ancestors allegedly faced so much horror that they can relitigate the same case over and over and keep giving Natives hundreds of millions of dollars.
I meant as a division between the Canadians living there for generations and the immigrants welcomed in from less 'progressive' societies.
They bend over backwards to welcome Muslims but white Canadians, they make adverts on how great euthanasia is.
Not your point, but we're actually getting an incessant influx of Indians more than anyone else. I think the South Asian population in Canada increased from <1 million in 2010 to > 3 million now. Cities like Brampton are majority South Asian now, and the city has become an absurdly busy mega-dump.
Why would anyone be surprised? India is a filthy, overcrowded shithole, and immigrants from there will just bring the same attributes that make that country so awful to the west.
I feel zero sympathy for post-colonial countries. It's entirely the fault of their citizens that they are so awful. Look at countries like Japan and Korea to see what all these other rat nests could have done with the last 75 years.
I like to play "spot the white person" when I go anywhere passed Whitby.
No the ones that descend from the founders and builders of Canada.
There were quarantine facilities that infected people were taken to and I think they even rounded up some Australian Aboriginals in some states, both of which are terrible, but to my knowledge they never locked up unvaccinated people specifically. They just treated them like second class citizens and froze them out of every aspect of life using vaccine passes.
Look up Howard Springs, amongst other places. They literally rounded up certain people, even if they never had covid.
It seems that was a facility for quarantining returning travelers and infected people from a nearby town.
I'm not excusing that. It's horrible. But unvaccinated people weren't rounded up and imprisoned.
It probably came close to that, however. Like I said, they were frozen out of every aspect of life using vax passes. The rhetoric from major politicians got very bad. I can still remember how scared and angry my Australian friend was at the height of it, and I'm still infuriated on his behalf.
(Edit: I'm sorry, that apparently did happen with one Aboriginal guy. Which makes it technically true to an extent but it's almost more to do with the Aboriginal communities being treated awfully in that state. I guess if you're both Aboriginal and unvaccinated you get it twice as bad.)
The official statement was that it was only quarantine. But even back then, there were multiple accounts and videos of people being visited by police and ordered to be sent there, forced to vacate their houses. Not only at this one location.
I recall reading about how a very similar facility was being built in Canada, in one of the Western provinces. I don't remember if it was British Columbia, Alberta or Manitoba, but around there. Fortunately, the trucker convoy happened before it was completed.
I actually got told those were a good thing because there was too many complaints of abuse regarding the hotels.
WHAT DO YOU THINK IS GOING TO HAPPEN WHEN YOU TRAP PEOPLE BEHIND TWO FENCES OF CONCERTINA WIRE???
The huge scandal that broke the whole quarantine stuff up is when they raided an "aboriginal" village and tried to drag him to a quarantine camp because he hadn't gotten the covid jab, because they needed to protect the village.
Real "we burned the village to save it" moment.
Oh, that did actually happen? It's still not 'unvaccinated' writ large but yeah, I hear that state (territory?) is racist as FUCK to those Aboriginal people. Actual racism, I mean. Extremely condescending, bureaucratic, 'it's for your own good' racism. I was really surprised to hear about some of the stuff that goes on there, to be honest.
It was one incident, and I believe they reversed course after it because it violated the progressive narrative.
This is why I removed myself from the organ transplant registry here in Canada. I refuse to support a system that's deemed me a second class citizen. I know of two cases like this here, one of which left 5 young kids without a father. Our Supreme Court won't even hear another woman's similar case.
I'd remove my tax support from the system entirely, and put it towards private health insurance instead, but that's not an option in Castreau Jr's Canada. Instead, I get to continue funding a system that thinks I'm better off dead. I'm sure they'd offer me MAID, in fact, if I ever needed a transplant.
They'll use the excuse of triage, of course. They're prioritizing patients that are willing to do what's necessary to stay healthy. They'll continue to ignore the overwhelming evidence that the covid vaccines have done more harm than good. They'll stick to their guns. The same guns they're more than happy to point at your head and pull the trigger. Compassionately.
I did the same although I live in the states. Fuck em.
I might consider that too, and it's not even that bad (yet) in USA. Hell, maybe the only reason it's not that bad yet is because they are intentionally using your countries as guinea pigs to see how they handle such a situation.
Amen brother
How many lung transplants go to those who actively destroyed their own with smoking, out of curiosity?
Here in the U.S., transplants are now prioritized by "equity" rules in a lot of hospitals. This has led to a couple of cases where a poor, deserving "youth" got a heart/lung/kidney and then got shot by an.. opposing group of youths or the police.
In a better society, these psychopaths would get home visits.
In a better society we'd have a Truth And Reconciliation Commission at least.
Thought a Nuremburg Trial would be better.
I really resent the fact that I’ve been driven to hate doctors by all this.
You haven’t been driven to hate, you’ve just had your eyes opened is all.
Doctors have always been evil.
In ancient Egypt and Greece they drilled holes into people’s heads to supposedly treat all sorts of ailments. In the Middle Ages they promoted blood letting and the use of leeches, maggots and all sorts of other wonderful things (wonder what caused all those plagues). In Victorian London the poor and destitute often ended up on operating tables, restrained with belts while some “doctor” prodded and sliced away with his contemporaries watching and taking notes from the theatre seats above. In the latter half of the 19th century they sold cocaine and arsenic as miracle cures. In WW1 they giddily roamed the battlefields with bone saws, and in WW2 the quickest profession to join the Nazi party were doctors.
I will never understand our society’s inexplicable love and reverence for these assholes, ESPECIALLY after 2020 and the jabs. At best they’re gullible fools, and at worst they’re the most evil profession in recorded human history, with more blood on their hands than even the worst dictators.
Even the “good” ones who start out with the noblest of intentions end up becoming blunt, uncaring narcissistic assholes. Guess that’s what playing God all day with other people’s lives does to you 🤷🏼‍♂️
This kind of behaviour is totally in character as far as I’m concerned. I can totally see them letting an innocent child die without a transplant just to prove their point. The medical industry is vile.
People thought highly of them because for about half your examples, that was them trying to do something with shit that worked for reasons they didn't understand but it vaguely did something positive.
Maggots and leeches are still used today because, while disgusting to look at, it does work for its intended purpose.
I agree with a lot of what you are getting at, but I can't begrudge people centuries ago for simply being ignorant of shit they couldn't possibly understand like germs and illnesses but still trying to do something. Because the alternative usually was just to sit down and die anyway.
I don’t fault them for not knowing any better, that’s a good point actually.
It’s the fucking God complex they all have, the fact that they did all of those terrible things NOT knowing whether any of it actually worked but believing so because that’s what the scientific consensus of the day told them. It mirrors what’s happening today with the jabs. It’s one thing to be ignorant, but to also wield that ignorance like some god given authority and actually put people’s lives in jeopardy (like this poor child’s) is abhorrent.
I guess I shouldn’t paint everyone with the same brush because there are CERTAINLY good people like Malone, McCullough and others who put their necks on the chopping block.
I just have an unshakable distrust of the entire Industry now that I don’t think is ever gonna go away
I don't fault you for that, I feel much the same for many of them both today and in the past century.
I just also know that much of the stuff that looks primitive, evil, and horrifying to us now was basically the only way we could progress at all at the time and for many people the only "cure" they could manage even if it was just placebo doing its thing.
Though personally, I've had mostly on the level interactions with most actual medical doctors (instead of just doctorate doctors) and the God Complexes are all the nurses that surround them acting like they are personally saving the world each day as they wipe shit out of an old man's leg hairs.
GUYYZZZ WE DIDN'T FORCE YOU TO TAKE THE SHOT
I am informed that in Australia, unvaccinated people only recently regained the right to visit loved ones in nursing homes. Technically, they were apparently allowed to visit but had to do so outdoors or at windows.
Sadly, many of these policies are held over not because of active discrimination, but because of the unrelenting evil of an incompetent bureaucracy that thinks itself infallible.
This policy will change in time, but probably too late to save this young girl from either dying or having to inject herself with poison. In the meantime, nobody unvaccinated in Australia (or anywhere else with this disgusting policy) should even consider donating organs except to loved ones. Why would you give to a system that deems you unworthy of receiving?
If u have a brain you don't put your old family in nursing homes to be abused and neglected. Just like you don't put your kids in public schools to be attacked by niggers and taught by leftists to mutilate themselves.
They are literally making us stronger by forcing us out of these institutions.
It's not always that simple, but even if it was, I have an immense amount of sympathy for people who were denied visitation to loved ones as a result of covid tyranny. Especially dying loved ones.
Apparently the policy, before it was dropped (again, very recently) said 'End of life visits may be allowed'.
May be allowed.
It's utterly evil.
It is that simple. Nursing homes are not good places. If you love your parents you take care of them. If they are too proud to accept your care than that's their problem. If you leave them in a nursing home they will be neglected 90% of the time.
It really isn't that simple, especially when dementia is involved. Sometimes care at home just isn't sufficient. Sometimes it's too much to handle, no matter how much you love someone. Sometimes there are other reasons it's not feasible.
Nursing homes aren't bad everywhere. But if you do have a loved one in a nursing home you have to make absolutely sure they're getting decent care.
And the father isn't going full John Q why?
Possibly he's going to raise money to have it done in the US. That's what Canadians do when our health care system fails them.
Truth. I had a Canadian co-worker stay in my spare bedroom for a couple weeks while she was down here getting knee ACL reconstruction surgery. At the time ( ~5 years ago) O Canada wanted her to hobble around on crutches for 18 months.
Shouldve pulled the race card. Also... this is how you get a crazed pissed off dad to pay you a visit lol.
Medical tourism is going to be even more of a growth sector if they keep up with this nonsense. Buy a few second tier cruise ships, retrofit and staff.
Don't worry they will happily take her organs
No hospital administrator should feel that safe, anywhere in the world.
Apologies if I've posted this before:
From Reason and Violence, R.D. Laing & D.G. Cooper, 1964:
"Vaccination as biopolitics and social practice from the German Empire to the Federal Republic"
There are no doctors, just politicians with lab coats