Pfizer Vaccine Batches in the EU Were Placebos, Say Scientists – The Daily Sceptic
Scientists have uncovered startling evidence that many of the batches of the Pfizer vaccine deployed in the EU may have been placebos – and the regulator knew this and did not subject them to quality-control testing.
If this is confirmed it makes the whole covid vaccine thing go from "incompetence and corruption" to "systematic evil".
Indeed - the wildest conspiracy theories were that the political class were getting saline shots.
There’s ZERO reason for a mass inoculation campaign to include placebo lots. At best it means they were beta testing with human lives and at worst it’s a planned mass poisoning.
Same reason these "totally random and completely unavoidable" chemical transportation spills are happening in areas with higher than pozzed percentage of white people.
Peak Prosperity had a video ( https://rumble.com/v230jdk-australian-covid-released.html ) a while back that went over some Australian data obtained in FOIA requests that basically showed that there were some "bad" batches that had a huge number of reported injuries associated with them, and that they were clearly contaminated.
The bad batches all just happened to be sent to retirement homes and hospice-type-care facilities. Bonus: there was no data for the batches reserved for Pfizer employees.
5 years ago I'd have probably just assumed it was coincidence. Now I'm 50/50 on yes, they really are that evil.
*edit: Here's the jikkileaks thread that the Peak Prosperity video was based on: https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1607609256521633798
I have another "conspiracy theory": The entire Pentagon program of "information warfare" used the coof fiasco as both a real-time training opportunity and a pretext for developing a ministry of information.
The coof was planned from the beginning as a way to implement "disinformation control."
Given the numbers of powerful dupes willing to play ball, they got good results.
Actually it makes sense for ANY medicine given to everybody have some amount of placebos.
You can't run a trial for a whole lifetime to find some weird interaction because people need medicine now not in 100 years. You have to run it live in the herd and people can't know if they got placebo as that may affect their results.
You especially want placebos in an experimental new technology with no long-term data.
If some of mRNA vaccines were secretly placebos that would be maybe the most responsible thing drug companies did in the whole affair. The actual problem is if they aren't doing this with measles vaccines and everything else given to everybody.
edit: notice below how there's no answer to the question of how you determine harm in medicine given to everybody other than with placebo.
No - it doesn’t.
That’s like saying it’s perfectly fine to give 10% of nornal flu-vaccine patients saline to make sure the flu-vaccine “works” this year.
It’s either a life saving medicine or it’s not. It’d be one thing if it was voluntary and still marked as “experimental” - but that’s not what they did. They mandated it for everybody under threat of loss of livelihood to “stop the pandemic” and knew the vaccine didn’t work by giving out placebos to judge the reactions or did so because they knew it was harmful and routed the placebos to the political elite.
It doesn’t matter for which - in all cases it’s an outright violation of medical ethics, let alone a criminal act.
Also it’s NOT SCIENCE if they don’t know which people got the placebo!
If measles vaccine has some serious problem that develops over say 50 years or generationally, how do you find out about it if everybody is given measles vaccine?
You give some people placebos. Can you think of any other way? No, you can't.
You're presuming the drug companies don't know who got placebo. Even if that's the case, which it could be to avoid smoking-gun liability, that doesn't mean it's not science.
Everybody that got the vaccine was tracked with what batch number they got so any differential effect can be seen at the batch level without knowing which batches were placebo and which were not. This is how double-blind trials are done in fact; even the experimenters don't know which are real vs placebo.
If the flu vaccine was given to everybody then yes, some placebos should be in there. It's not however, lots of people don't get a normal flu vaccine.
It would be criminal only because the masses are too dumb to understand why a control group is necessary in science.
Again if you so stupidly believe that placebos are intentionally given out - HOW DO THEY TRACK IT?!
They kinda need that for their studies, dontcha think?
"Everybody that got the vaccine was tracked with what batch number they got"
Do you not read? Statistical differences between batches are unexplained, the closer to how many got placebo indicates likelihood placebo explains the difference.
For instance if 30% of batches were placebo and 30% of batches had significantly higher deaths from covid, likely explanation is the vaccine works and those 30% anomalies got placebo.
It's stronger to know which batches are placebo, but not necessary. You don't seem to have any clue how science works. You can't answer the question of how to determine harm in medicine given to everybody because the answer - placebo- is counter to your wrong beliefs.
So what?! Unless the doctor's office returns the health status of EVERY PERSON IN COORDINATION WITH EVERY BATCH NUMBER that got a vaccine. Continually. It doesn't matter if they're "tracking batch numbers" because... they're not actually tracking batch numbers.
Batch numbers are just one point of data. For proper measurement there must be end recipient tracking.
You don't think all those CVS innoculations were tracked... do you?
You're still missing the other part of the equation: how does Pfizer gain access to the medical records of the people receiving the vaccine/placebos if they never agreed to take part in a medical trial? Without the outcomes there is no data.
I like that you're hiding behind "science" though, as if invoking that word is sufficient justification for falsifying medical labels and committing fraud.
Do you have any evidence of mass placebo distribution outside of medical trials or is this just your schizo internet fantasy?
The entire COVID thing was systematic evil from its inception
It was systematic evil from the start, this is just confirmation of what we've known the whole time. Anyone with a brain and access to enough information figured out that this whole thing was malicious.
We already knew this based on the 'damage' from batches. It was clear they were experimenting with the released drug, which is both illegal and unethical, so most people got saline.
The ones who got the actual mRNA were the test groups and they all had massive problems, which means the actual damage is does is way, way higher then we realize because the control group is INCLUDED IN THE RESULTS.
I almost feel better about the saline batches. Imagine what could have happened if they gave people the real thing.
Not really, they used cheap saline and solid it for $20 a pop to Governments without informing them.
That's literally mass murder if the disease was actually damaging.
That's kinda my point. Was it even that damaging? We already know that it took most governments at least 2 years to distinguish between "with Covid" and "from Covid". Not to mention that apparently no one died of Flu in all of 2020.
This data will not be available in the US. Either "we don't track it", "it was accidentally destroyed" or "you are a neo nazi misogynist white supremacist anti vaxer" if you request it.
Considering that the "vaccine" has never been proven to have any benefits, getting the saline shot seems like the good outcome. At least saline shots aren't known for having all the side effects that they refuse to acknowledge from the shots.
It's not paranoia, it's pattern recognition. Anyone who trusted these shots, when these companies were working on such a short timeframe and with legal immunity, is a damned fool. Pfizer didn't get the world record for the largest criminal fine in history for no reason.
New Nuremberg trials are starting when?
You're getting ahead of yourself. Let's start with gas vans and see how it goes.
You have to take power first and that would require overthrowing several governments at this point.
Makes me wonder if the vaccines weren't really placebos and this is being used to dispell talk of the vaccines causing health problems
This makes sense given the huge disparity in side effects. Every single person I know that got the pfizer variety had zero side effects other than a probably placebo induced "rough night" right after. Meanwhile you can head to r/vaccinelonghaulers and find thousands of threads from all over the world of debilitating illness.
If they're already conducting hidden experiments on whole populations to this degree, there's no guarantee that there's a simple division of 'real jab' vs 'saline' either. There could be different degrees of 'placebo', eg. saline vs empty LNP, different formulations of the mRNA just to see what happens (as in the blue batches which were mysteriously administered in lower numbers), anything. Everything is out the window - except for the certainty that the mRNA tech is much more dangerous than they admit, because they mixed a control group in with the real group which diluted the prevalence of adverse effects.
EDIT: This is actually huge for me because throughout all the 'bad batch' speculation I never got too interested, assuming that the 'bad' batches with most AEs were simply the biggest ones or that it might be a kind of #NotAllJabs damage control narrative (context: there are, I suspect, a lot of shills around these days trying to offer this or that reason why the jabs are not bad by definition, but that they were just bad due to mistakes this time). Now I realise they were actually the smallest batches, and that the largest batches were also pretty bad, and both were distributed along with tons of control jabs to dilute the danger signal, making it much more evil and calculated than I had imagined.
Unethical if not flat-out illegal
Makes absolutely all data on "vaccine effectiveness" irrelevant
Quite possibly good news in the end for lots of EU people, though, as risk of vax-related injuries is lower for a lot of them.
Danish study says that 32%-ish of total doses, across 35%-ish of total batches, would fall in the bracket of strongly suspected placebo. If that held true for other countries then it's some comfort to anyone jabbed and worrying, though not much.
https://archive.is/VtQfT