"Everybody that got the vaccine was tracked with what batch number they got"
Do you not read? Statistical differences between batches are unexplained, the closer to how many got placebo indicates likelihood placebo explains the difference.
For instance if 30% of batches were placebo and 30% of batches had significantly higher deaths from covid, likely explanation is the vaccine works and those 30% anomalies got placebo.
It's stronger to know which batches are placebo, but not necessary. You don't seem to have any clue how science works. You can't answer the question of how to determine harm in medicine given to everybody because the answer - placebo- is counter to your wrong beliefs.
So what?! Unless the doctor's office returns the health status of EVERY PERSON IN COORDINATION WITH EVERY BATCH NUMBER that got a vaccine. Continually. It doesn't matter if they're "tracking batch numbers" because... they're not actually tracking batch numbers.
Batch numbers are just one point of data. For proper measurement there must be end recipient tracking.
You don't think all those CVS innoculations were tracked... do you?
"Everybody that got the vaccine was tracked with what batch number they got"
You're still missing the other part of the equation: how does Pfizer gain access to the medical records of the people receiving the vaccine/placebos if they never agreed to take part in a medical trial? Without the outcomes there is no data.
I like that you're hiding behind "science" though, as if invoking that word is sufficient justification for falsifying medical labels and committing fraud.
Do you have any evidence of mass placebo distribution outside of medical trials or is this just your schizo internet fantasy?
In most countries there's a national database of health records.
Pfizer can no doubt find a way to access these records, but they may not even care. The usefulness of having this evidence is when there are major problems that people will notice, but all Pfizer may care about is if they can use mRNA in future treatments without enough problem that people notice.
How is anything I've written "hiding" behind science? Can YOU answer the question of how to determine harm in medicine given to everybody? No, you can't.
And you can't because you're too cowardly to admit it'd have to be with a placebo.
Pfizer can no doubt find a way to access these records, but they may not even care.
LOL! So now we're talking about stealing medical records! All in a day's work for science.
The usefulness of having this evidence is when there are major problems that people will notice, but all Pfizer may care about is if they can use mRNA in future treatments without enough problem that people notice.
?????
What are you trying to say? Do you see some usefulness to humanity in this little scheme or is this just a more tortured way of saying Pfizer is evil?
How is anything I've written "hiding" behind science? Can YOU answer the question of how to determine harm in medicine given to everybody? No, you can't.
And you can't because you're too cowardly to admit it'd have to be with a placebo.
I don't even know what you're talking about at this point, so I couldn't say
LOL! So now we're talking about stealing medical records! All in a day's work for science.
You're imagining things again. "Data for Doses", Pfizer gets Israel's data.
Like a giant drug company has to steal records. Ha ha what a rube.
What are you trying to say? ... I don't even know what you're talking about at this point
"how can you determine harm in medicine given to everybody?"
Seriously how dumb are you? It's not a hard question to understand what's being asked. You really can't understand that question? That's embarrassing for you.
"Everybody that got the vaccine was tracked with what batch number they got"
Do you not read? Statistical differences between batches are unexplained, the closer to how many got placebo indicates likelihood placebo explains the difference.
For instance if 30% of batches were placebo and 30% of batches had significantly higher deaths from covid, likely explanation is the vaccine works and those 30% anomalies got placebo.
It's stronger to know which batches are placebo, but not necessary. You don't seem to have any clue how science works. You can't answer the question of how to determine harm in medicine given to everybody because the answer - placebo- is counter to your wrong beliefs.
So what?! Unless the doctor's office returns the health status of EVERY PERSON IN COORDINATION WITH EVERY BATCH NUMBER that got a vaccine. Continually. It doesn't matter if they're "tracking batch numbers" because... they're not actually tracking batch numbers.
Batch numbers are just one point of data. For proper measurement there must be end recipient tracking.
You don't think all those CVS innoculations were tracked... do you?
Veteran's Affairs, National Health Service, etc. There's TONS of data including batch numbers and outcomes.
You also didn't answer the big question. You have some great idea about how to determine harm in medicine given to everybody? Speak up, son.
You're still missing the other part of the equation: how does Pfizer gain access to the medical records of the people receiving the vaccine/placebos if they never agreed to take part in a medical trial? Without the outcomes there is no data.
I like that you're hiding behind "science" though, as if invoking that word is sufficient justification for falsifying medical labels and committing fraud.
Do you have any evidence of mass placebo distribution outside of medical trials or is this just your schizo internet fantasy?
In most countries there's a national database of health records.
Pfizer can no doubt find a way to access these records, but they may not even care. The usefulness of having this evidence is when there are major problems that people will notice, but all Pfizer may care about is if they can use mRNA in future treatments without enough problem that people notice.
How is anything I've written "hiding" behind science? Can YOU answer the question of how to determine harm in medicine given to everybody? No, you can't.
And you can't because you're too cowardly to admit it'd have to be with a placebo.
LOL! So now we're talking about stealing medical records! All in a day's work for science.
?????
What are you trying to say? Do you see some usefulness to humanity in this little scheme or is this just a more tortured way of saying Pfizer is evil?
I don't even know what you're talking about at this point, so I couldn't say
You're imagining things again. "Data for Doses", Pfizer gets Israel's data.
Like a giant drug company has to steal records. Ha ha what a rube.
"how can you determine harm in medicine given to everybody?"
Seriously how dumb are you? It's not a hard question to understand what's being asked. You really can't understand that question? That's embarrassing for you.