In most countries there's a national database of health records.
Pfizer can no doubt find a way to access these records, but they may not even care. The usefulness of having this evidence is when there are major problems that people will notice, but all Pfizer may care about is if they can use mRNA in future treatments without enough problem that people notice.
How is anything I've written "hiding" behind science? Can YOU answer the question of how to determine harm in medicine given to everybody? No, you can't.
And you can't because you're too cowardly to admit it'd have to be with a placebo.
Pfizer can no doubt find a way to access these records, but they may not even care.
LOL! So now we're talking about stealing medical records! All in a day's work for science.
The usefulness of having this evidence is when there are major problems that people will notice, but all Pfizer may care about is if they can use mRNA in future treatments without enough problem that people notice.
?????
What are you trying to say? Do you see some usefulness to humanity in this little scheme or is this just a more tortured way of saying Pfizer is evil?
How is anything I've written "hiding" behind science? Can YOU answer the question of how to determine harm in medicine given to everybody? No, you can't.
And you can't because you're too cowardly to admit it'd have to be with a placebo.
I don't even know what you're talking about at this point, so I couldn't say
LOL! So now we're talking about stealing medical records! All in a day's work for science.
You're imagining things again. "Data for Doses", Pfizer gets Israel's data.
Like a giant drug company has to steal records. Ha ha what a rube.
What are you trying to say? ... I don't even know what you're talking about at this point
"how can you determine harm in medicine given to everybody?"
Seriously how dumb are you? It's not a hard question to understand what's being asked. You really can't understand that question? That's embarrassing for you.
You're imagining things again. "Data for Doses", Pfizer gets Israel's data.
Like a giant drug company has to steal records. Ha ha what a rube.
What a surprise the Jews decided to give personal medical records to a megacorp. What about the other 200 countries in the world? Are we suspending HIPAA so Pfizer can conduct experiments on us?
"how can you determine harm in medicine given to everybody?"
Seriously how dumb are you? It's not a hard question to understand what's being asked. You really can't understand that question? That's embarrassing for you.
Lol you act like you're the only person in the room who understands what a placebo is. We know, idiot, but here's another really obvious thing that escaped you: there are some questions that are unanswerable not because of feasibility, but because of basic ethics. This falls into one of those categories.
What about the other 200 countries in the world? Are we suspending HIPAA so Pfizer can conduct experiments on us?
The text of the agreements are secret, so who knows. HIPAA doesn't cover anonymized data. Drug companies can pay researchers to do a study and trash it if the results aren't good. There's many ways to access info.
You have the imagination an ant if you think a hundred billion dollar company can't get access to information. What a dumb point for you to get hung up on.
Lol you act like you're the only person in the room who understands what a placebo is.
How do you tell if there's harm from a medication that all people get other than through placebo? Still can't answer the question.
there are some questions that are unanswerable not because of feasibility, but because of basic ethics.
In this case there are questions that are unanswerable because you are too dumb to understand what the question is or how it's relevant.
But here's a hint for you: It's also unethical to put an entire population at risk of harm. This is a trolley problem not black and white morality.
In most countries there's a national database of health records.
Pfizer can no doubt find a way to access these records, but they may not even care. The usefulness of having this evidence is when there are major problems that people will notice, but all Pfizer may care about is if they can use mRNA in future treatments without enough problem that people notice.
How is anything I've written "hiding" behind science? Can YOU answer the question of how to determine harm in medicine given to everybody? No, you can't.
And you can't because you're too cowardly to admit it'd have to be with a placebo.
LOL! So now we're talking about stealing medical records! All in a day's work for science.
?????
What are you trying to say? Do you see some usefulness to humanity in this little scheme or is this just a more tortured way of saying Pfizer is evil?
I don't even know what you're talking about at this point, so I couldn't say
You're imagining things again. "Data for Doses", Pfizer gets Israel's data.
Like a giant drug company has to steal records. Ha ha what a rube.
"how can you determine harm in medicine given to everybody?"
Seriously how dumb are you? It's not a hard question to understand what's being asked. You really can't understand that question? That's embarrassing for you.
What a surprise the Jews decided to give personal medical records to a megacorp. What about the other 200 countries in the world? Are we suspending HIPAA so Pfizer can conduct experiments on us?
Lol you act like you're the only person in the room who understands what a placebo is. We know, idiot, but here's another really obvious thing that escaped you: there are some questions that are unanswerable not because of feasibility, but because of basic ethics. This falls into one of those categories.
The text of the agreements are secret, so who knows. HIPAA doesn't cover anonymized data. Drug companies can pay researchers to do a study and trash it if the results aren't good. There's many ways to access info.
You have the imagination an ant if you think a hundred billion dollar company can't get access to information. What a dumb point for you to get hung up on.
How do you tell if there's harm from a medication that all people get other than through placebo? Still can't answer the question.
In this case there are questions that are unanswerable because you are too dumb to understand what the question is or how it's relevant.
But here's a hint for you: It's also unethical to put an entire population at risk of harm. This is a trolley problem not black and white morality.