LOL! So now we're talking about stealing medical records! All in a day's work for science.
You're imagining things again. "Data for Doses", Pfizer gets Israel's data.
Like a giant drug company has to steal records. Ha ha what a rube.
What are you trying to say? ... I don't even know what you're talking about at this point
"how can you determine harm in medicine given to everybody?"
Seriously how dumb are you? It's not a hard question to understand what's being asked. You really can't understand that question? That's embarrassing for you.
You're imagining things again. "Data for Doses", Pfizer gets Israel's data.
Like a giant drug company has to steal records. Ha ha what a rube.
What a surprise the Jews decided to give personal medical records to a megacorp. What about the other 200 countries in the world? Are we suspending HIPAA so Pfizer can conduct experiments on us?
"how can you determine harm in medicine given to everybody?"
Seriously how dumb are you? It's not a hard question to understand what's being asked. You really can't understand that question? That's embarrassing for you.
Lol you act like you're the only person in the room who understands what a placebo is. We know, idiot, but here's another really obvious thing that escaped you: there are some questions that are unanswerable not because of feasibility, but because of basic ethics. This falls into one of those categories.
What about the other 200 countries in the world? Are we suspending HIPAA so Pfizer can conduct experiments on us?
The text of the agreements are secret, so who knows. HIPAA doesn't cover anonymized data. Drug companies can pay researchers to do a study and trash it if the results aren't good. There's many ways to access info.
You have the imagination an ant if you think a hundred billion dollar company can't get access to information. What a dumb point for you to get hung up on.
Lol you act like you're the only person in the room who understands what a placebo is.
How do you tell if there's harm from a medication that all people get other than through placebo? Still can't answer the question.
there are some questions that are unanswerable not because of feasibility, but because of basic ethics.
In this case there are questions that are unanswerable because you are too dumb to understand what the question is or how it's relevant.
But here's a hint for you: It's also unethical to put an entire population at risk of harm. This is a trolley problem not black and white morality.
Obviously a megacorp can get access to anything they want, this is America. Thanks to dupes like you, the sky's the limit.
How do you tell if there's harm from a medication that all people get other than through placebo? Still can't answer the question.
In this case there are questions that are unanswerable because you are too dumb to understand what the question is or how it's relevant.
But here's a hint for you: It's also unethical to put an entire population at risk of harm. This is a trolley problem not black and white morality.
Keep blustering, you're obviously just a schmuck on the internet. If you have to conduct a single-blind study on the entire population of the world to figure out if your treatment is harmful over the long run, better just not to release it. Because, you know, that kind of puts the vast majority of the world at risk of harm?
That's kind of the "ethical norm." You know, the reason we have these things called "medical trials." You should look up that word "ethics" some time, but get someone to hit you in the head with the dictionary first.
If you have to conduct a single-blind study on the entire population of the world to figure out if your treatment is harmful over the long run, better just not to release it.
Wow you really can't understand the question then. Ha ha I thought you were just pretending to be dumb, but no!
You're imagining things again. "Data for Doses", Pfizer gets Israel's data.
Like a giant drug company has to steal records. Ha ha what a rube.
"how can you determine harm in medicine given to everybody?"
Seriously how dumb are you? It's not a hard question to understand what's being asked. You really can't understand that question? That's embarrassing for you.
What a surprise the Jews decided to give personal medical records to a megacorp. What about the other 200 countries in the world? Are we suspending HIPAA so Pfizer can conduct experiments on us?
Lol you act like you're the only person in the room who understands what a placebo is. We know, idiot, but here's another really obvious thing that escaped you: there are some questions that are unanswerable not because of feasibility, but because of basic ethics. This falls into one of those categories.
The text of the agreements are secret, so who knows. HIPAA doesn't cover anonymized data. Drug companies can pay researchers to do a study and trash it if the results aren't good. There's many ways to access info.
You have the imagination an ant if you think a hundred billion dollar company can't get access to information. What a dumb point for you to get hung up on.
How do you tell if there's harm from a medication that all people get other than through placebo? Still can't answer the question.
In this case there are questions that are unanswerable because you are too dumb to understand what the question is or how it's relevant.
But here's a hint for you: It's also unethical to put an entire population at risk of harm. This is a trolley problem not black and white morality.
Obviously a megacorp can get access to anything they want, this is America. Thanks to dupes like you, the sky's the limit.
Keep blustering, you're obviously just a schmuck on the internet. If you have to conduct a single-blind study on the entire population of the world to figure out if your treatment is harmful over the long run, better just not to release it. Because, you know, that kind of puts the vast majority of the world at risk of harm?
That's kind of the "ethical norm." You know, the reason we have these things called "medical trials." You should look up that word "ethics" some time, but get someone to hit you in the head with the dictionary first.
Wow you really can't understand the question then. Ha ha I thought you were just pretending to be dumb, but no!