How can someone be an asylum seeker 15 countries away from theirs? Make no mistake there is an initiative to fill up white countries with immigrants. Why not give them asylum in UAE? In Turkey? Already Muslim countries so little to no assimilation to do, they're war free, but no, let's group them and organize them safe travel to UK, France, Sweden, Germany. Besides, they would have to, God forbid, work in Turkey, as I highly doubt Erdogan would give them free gibbs and tolerate their bullshit.
Everyone knows they’re not “asylum seekers”. They use the buzzword out of political correctness to describe millions of military aged males walking in with their hands out.
Make no mistake there is an initiative to fill up white countries with immigrants.
You say that like it's some kind of secret. It's plainly stated for anyone willing to look. Although they list a few Asian countries as well, communist China is notably absent from this list in spite of their single child policy and its consequences.
Easy they are more leftists. British tories are closer to dems than gop. France called a fucking socialsit (Le Pen) muh far right. Germany is controlled by leftists and once again smesrs centrists (afd) as muh far right muh nazi. Their so called right wing parties are leftists.
Meanwhile japan got threatened by bidens communists
The more neutral you can pretend to be the less you will trigger the NPC cognitive dissonance defense mechanisms of refusing to process any facts that come from a "bad" person.
“Asylum seeker” is typical newspeak like “gender affirming care” or “peaceful protests”. I understand wanting a better life/opportunity but asylum has a very strict definition. These people are economic opportunists or economic migrants if you want to be nice but illegal alien has been the preferred term until the media got offended.
Not surprised about the crime rates at all. And I take it the EU just ignores all this
Anyone who isn't native to a location will have far less intrinsic interest about their surrounding because it isn't theirs, so they don't give a shit about what state they might leave a place in, nor any local laws and how it affects the locals.
This is what happens when the government refuses to consider relevant questions like "Is the asylum seeker a military-aged male who believes in the moral perfection of child rape, slavery and ethnic cleansing?"
How can someone be an asylum "seeker" when they are already in a safe country? He is no longer seeking "asylum" he is seeking legal status.
The term is emotionally loaded newspeak, mostly meant to employ women's pathological empathy for the purpose of forward the globalist agenda.
Invader is most correct but not palatable to normies and shows your power level.
Immigrant is technically correct and mainstream neutral.
How can someone be an asylum seeker 15 countries away from theirs? Make no mistake there is an initiative to fill up white countries with immigrants. Why not give them asylum in UAE? In Turkey? Already Muslim countries so little to no assimilation to do, they're war free, but no, let's group them and organize them safe travel to UK, France, Sweden, Germany. Besides, they would have to, God forbid, work in Turkey, as I highly doubt Erdogan would give them free gibbs and tolerate their bullshit.
Everyone knows they’re not “asylum seekers”. They use the buzzword out of political correctness to describe millions of military aged males walking in with their hands out.
You say that like it's some kind of secret. It's plainly stated for anyone willing to look. Although they list a few Asian countries as well, communist China is notably absent from this list in spite of their single child policy and its consequences.
https://archive.is/https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.asp
Leftists want to genocide Whites and do so by replacing them (1965 immigration act, bidens open borders as an example)
Its leftist. Lbj, fdr, biden, aoc all have something in common. Theyre all far left
Now explain Britain, Australia, France, Germany and now Japan. This is more than your American Right versus Left, Conservative versus Democrat.
Easy they are more leftists. British tories are closer to dems than gop. France called a fucking socialsit (Le Pen) muh far right. Germany is controlled by leftists and once again smesrs centrists (afd) as muh far right muh nazi. Their so called right wing parties are leftists. Meanwhile japan got threatened by bidens communists
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
If you look at US asylum it just lets anyone into the country.
I honestly can't tell if you mean this as a good thing or a bad thing.
The more neutral you can pretend to be the less you will trigger the NPC cognitive dissonance defense mechanisms of refusing to process any facts that come from a "bad" person.
So what does that make "illegal alien"?
Softer than invader.
“Asylum seeker” is typical newspeak like “gender affirming care” or “peaceful protests”. I understand wanting a better life/opportunity but asylum has a very strict definition. These people are economic opportunists or economic migrants if you want to be nice but illegal alien has been the preferred term until the media got offended.
Not surprised about the crime rates at all. And I take it the EU just ignores all this
The same with the horde of Hispanics crossing the US's border. The only thing they're seeking asylum from is being poor.
Now do the other crimes.
Anyone who isn't native to a location will have far less intrinsic interest about their surrounding because it isn't theirs, so they don't give a shit about what state they might leave a place in, nor any local laws and how it affects the locals.
Breaking news: criminal murderers more likely to be murderer. Heres a solution: physically remove all illegal alien vermin
Things that make you go "Hmm 🤔"
People whom are already blatantly primed to ignore rules and normal civilized behavior are willing to commit illegal and violent acts?
Say it ain't so.
This is what happens when the government refuses to consider relevant questions like "Is the asylum seeker a military-aged male who believes in the moral perfection of child rape, slavery and ethnic cleansing?"
Fuck off simp, men can be suffering too.
Based on the ethnicity of most of the migrant men and their religion, you would think that they would all be about the women and children first?
Why are the Ukrainian the only one following the trad roles?
Because the Ukrainians were forced to by a corrupt EU backed government.
Most of those regions have collapsed governments, so nobody can enforce "women are your superiors" trash.
I do not believe your numbers, OP. They have to be a lie. There's no proof or data to show what you're saying.
It has to be closer to 20x more likely, not 5x.
the only "asylum seekers" are those chased to the embassy by the state
It's Ok to be white?
That must be why the ONS still refuses to tell anyone the amount of non-gang affiliated murders by gender.
I'm cutting out a group that doesn't affect others. If you're not in a gang, you don't care about them killing each other.
It's like including suicides in gun deaths. Completely irrational.
Why don't women want us to know who is most likely to commit a random killing in the UK?
The only reason I even bothered clicking on this thread was just to see how you fit a women angle here, and of course, you delivered.
That's why it's interesting.
That's why I click on half the stuff here. It's always fun to see how he makes everything about wamman
So you'd rather the "asylum seekers" be men?
That makes more sense. Women can just shack up with the invaders as they always do.