They have been on this kick recently where they say that any short woman is a loli or pedo bait even when their proportions are entirely that of an adult woman (they are just short).
But you can also tell they have no idea what is actually a realistic standard for what a woman would be, because I have seen some of these dumbasses declare that being shorter than 5'6" is loli territory. 5'6" is 2 inches taller than the average of American women, and 4 inches taller than the average Japanese woman.
It is very obvious that a lot of the Twitter Freaks dont actually know what real people are like.
They despise shortstacks, a lot of the left look like big bean bags so are jealous that a short but curvy woman in healthy way get a lot of male attention
Ignoring short or tall, men just prefer healthy women, something their own self entitlement refuses to acknowledge.
I think at least one province or state (Ontario?) made the child seat law so that anyone under a certain height had to sit in one. Not to mention all the dingleberries running around wanting to call anything under 30 a "child", so there you go.
It's basically a deliberate infantilization of society, like (behavioural) neoteny gone wild.
It's uzaki chan mark 2, heard about from this ,the Japanese side nothing negative, English post got a big reaction claiming 'Pedo bait' when:
1.Shes stacked more than a bakery
2. Is just short and wearing office clothes
It's stupid, fun to laugh at and a reminder they have no standing to dictate entertainment, anything with children and laws on sexuality if a 4'8 ft woman with DDs makes them think of children.
Its even worse than Uzaki to them, because unlike Uzaki (who is annoying and tries to be a bully) this character is almost angelically wholesome and unconditionally affectionate.
Its pure bait for giving men "unreasonable expectations" of things like kindness and goodness from women, and the Twitter types hate that most of all.
I have single coworkers who refuse to flaunt the fact that they’re over 6 feet tall and make more than 100k/year. I try to tell them but they don’t listen.
Pretty much, so long as It's drawn,I don't give a shit, I like characters from Pawoo from sabikui bisco, Marin Kitagawa from My dress up darling to Rory from GATE, all different fictional body types, ages and personalities.
Should stop even considering applying the real world to it as the left are already an example of what happens when you can't seperate fiction from reality.
I still remember the Australian PM I think at one point was trying to claim that women with no breasts aren't fully developed women and I was all WTF lol.
I don't know if this is true, but apparently, an Australian court ruling ordered that all porn actresses be at least a C cup--because any smaller would make them APPEAR to be underage, thus fuel for pedophiles, regardless of how old the actress actually was.
Seeing what the Land Down Under has become since lockdowns started, I believe it.
It's thought control from both sides by making every issue so braindead people can't think for themselves.
If everything on the left is 'love is love and people can't be held responsible due to victimhood' and the right is 'no tits, not a woman and you're a pedo for viewing them sexually' you're ignoring the nuance of context since you can have a petite 4'8 26 year old woman who can easily think for herself but both sides will claim some kind of can't like this person sexually because of their size
I don't know if intentional or not but seems to target Asians the most since they are smaller by comparison to other races and can maintain a youthful appearance for a lot longer.
If someone was nieve enough to believe this they wouldn't last in politics.
The older generation is much more aware of how everything the women are pushing is just an excuse for getting something else, so they do the same thing back.
Truly insane to look at a cartoon character who works in an office and has huge tits and conclude that anybody who likes her must be attracted to children.
They have been on this kick recently where they say that any short woman is a loli or pedo bait even when their proportions are entirely that of an adult woman (they are just short).
But you can also tell they have no idea what is actually a realistic standard for what a woman would be, because I have seen some of these dumbasses declare that being shorter than 5'6" is loli territory. 5'6" is 2 inches taller than the average of American women, and 4 inches taller than the average Japanese woman.
It is very obvious that a lot of the Twitter Freaks dont actually know what real people are like.
Woman: I prefer tall men because I like to feel protected.
Man: fair enough. I prefer short women because I like to feel protective.
Woman: you’re a pedophile.
And a misogynist! Women want to be protected, but if men want to protect that's bad and sexist and masculine and patriarchal, or whatever.
Yet if they don't do it, it's the same.
There's power in being the one who decides what's problematic, which means everything is a problem.
Meaning taking offense is about power and always has been nothing but a shit test.
"woman":
What is that?
Implying they're troons because
It's ironic since MtF's decry anime characters with mature, feminine qualities while embodying the shallowest caricature of womanhood.
That AND they are shit at maths
Don't trust them with firing trajectories, they will end up blowing up YOUR base..
I don't want these cretins serving me fries, much less serving in the military.
...Actually, I take it back. Watching these fucks friendly-fire themselves would be endlessly entertaining.
I am exactly on the edge between loli or not? The actual fuck? I don't look like a child, I am definitely not behaving like a child.
They despise shortstacks, a lot of the left look like big bean bags so are jealous that a short but curvy woman in healthy way get a lot of male attention
Ignoring short or tall, men just prefer healthy women, something their own self entitlement refuses to acknowledge.
I think at least one province or state (Ontario?) made the child seat law so that anyone under a certain height had to sit in one. Not to mention all the dingleberries running around wanting to call anything under 30 a "child", so there you go.
It's basically a deliberate infantilization of society, like (behavioural) neoteny gone wild.
It's a reflection of the age of the people really running politics.
It is not only size. It's also age. If you're 18 you are still a child to them until you turn 21, seems that age to "updated" to 25 now, lmao.
It's uzaki chan mark 2, heard about from this ,the Japanese side nothing negative, English post got a big reaction claiming 'Pedo bait' when:
1.Shes stacked more than a bakery 2. Is just short and wearing office clothes
It's stupid, fun to laugh at and a reminder they have no standing to dictate entertainment, anything with children and laws on sexuality if a 4'8 ft woman with DDs makes them think of children.
Its even worse than Uzaki to them, because unlike Uzaki (who is annoying and tries to be a bully) this character is almost angelically wholesome and unconditionally affectionate.
Its pure bait for giving men "unreasonable expectations" of things like kindness and goodness from women, and the Twitter types hate that most of all.
Women: "I want a man with a six-figure salary, six feet tall, and six-pack abs."
Men: "I want a woman who's not fat and not a bitch."
Women: "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!"
I have single coworkers who refuse to flaunt the fact that they’re over 6 feet tall and make more than 100k/year. I try to tell them but they don’t listen.
And anime has shown that both the fat and bitch are negotiable to a lot of guys.
The only consistent is "giving it only to me."
Imagine thinking women not being harpies is unreasonable, gotta love Twatter idiots.
Pretty much, so long as It's drawn,I don't give a shit, I like characters from Pawoo from sabikui bisco, Marin Kitagawa from My dress up darling to Rory from GATE, all different fictional body types, ages and personalities.
Should stop even considering applying the real world to it as the left are already an example of what happens when you can't seperate fiction from reality.
There is a pro wrestler named Shoko Nakajima.
Her nickname is "The 147cm Kaiju."
147 centimeters is 4'10".
I bet they say the same about her.
I don't know if this is true, but apparently, an Australian court ruling ordered that all porn actresses be at least a C cup--because any smaller would make them APPEAR to be underage, thus fuel for pedophiles, regardless of how old the actress actually was.
Seeing what the Land Down Under has become since lockdowns started, I believe it.
It's thought control from both sides by making every issue so braindead people can't think for themselves.
If everything on the left is 'love is love and people can't be held responsible due to victimhood' and the right is 'no tits, not a woman and you're a pedo for viewing them sexually' you're ignoring the nuance of context since you can have a petite 4'8 26 year old woman who can easily think for herself but both sides will claim some kind of can't like this person sexually because of their size
I don't know if intentional or not but seems to target Asians the most since they are smaller by comparison to other races and can maintain a youthful appearance for a lot longer.
If someone was nieve enough to believe this they wouldn't last in politics.
The older generation is much more aware of how everything the women are pushing is just an excuse for getting something else, so they do the same thing back.
Checks for her bio and images
Yeah I just see a cute muscular woman in what appears to me mock Indian gear, they probably see a kid because she's short..
Truly insane to look at a cartoon character who works in an office and has huge tits and conclude that anybody who likes her must be attracted to children.
Short people dont exist to twitter users.
Looks like a ripoff of Senpai ga Uzai Kouhai no Hanashi with less charm